cawacko
Well-known member
Speculation! Your assumptions here are implausible; that is, highly unlikely at best absurd at worst.
Really? Never happens? Never happens in the workplace?
Speculation! Your assumptions here are implausible; that is, highly unlikely at best absurd at worst.
Maybe this is where your white male privilege comes in and you can't put yourself in a young woman's shoes.
A (male) CEO hits on a young woman. She doesn't want to do it but is afraid of losing her job so she goes along. As an intern she is afraid to go to HR and report it because she's intimated by the CEO and afraid no one will believe her or take her side. So she keeps her mouth shut. Her fault?
I think it's a good strategy, tying the presumptive Democrat front-runner to that predator. We don't want him anywhere near the white house again...
they just cant see women as equals.
they pretend Monica is not on record saying she wanted him Before they interacted
All the evidence shows it was ML who perused BC.
It is so funny watching liberals portray Monica as the predator and Billy as the victim. These lefties are shameless
She perused him, Counselor?
Bill Clinton is not the victim, as I have already said, there is no victim here except possibly Hillary Clinton.
Really? Never happens? Never happens in the workplace?
Look you defend him all you want. You do people like me a favor because you take issues like sexual harassment off the table. It is no longer an issue.
I get it. A 21 year old came on to a 50 year old and he just couldn't control himself. He couldn't honor the vows he took.
Funny you only think Hillary is a victim. Monica's life was ruined.
But what about Chelsea? She wasn't a victim watching her dad's affair played out? Or do you think she is in on the sham that is the Clinton marriage?
Go back and read your original statement a few times caeacko until you get clear in your mind what you are saying in the original statement and then see if that contradicts what you are saying in this post. Go ahead prove to me that you can read after all these years by reading what you just wrote. And then we'll talk! But you have to read your original statement first. The hypothetical, it was a hypothetical wasn't it cawacko. Do agree with that? Do you agree that you posed a hypothetical situation yes or no!? Do you think that "let's say" is the same as saying "if" yes or no? Simple question. Just yesterday you said if I had a question be man enough to ask it. Well here it is cawacko, simple question. Do you agree that you are posing a hypothetical situation?
According to her testimony.
Caw, the thing is, it clearly happens... I believe, but to me its not sexual harassment unless the victim expressesses some indication she does not accept the advances.
So women who don't object to sexual advances from male bosses have no grounds for complaint, Counselor?
Even if they may not have complained because of fear of reprisal?