Settling the Biological Virus Debate

Scott said:
Ah ok. Alright, for you I'll make an exception and not move things over to APP. I just want to avoid the regular insults as much as possible which is why I made the thread over there.
Click to expand...
iu
 
Nordberg said:
Rightys do think like RFK. It is scary that he is in charge and they approve. https://www.facebook.com/reel/639060105340043 He makes millions off vaccine lies.
Click to expand...

As you probably know, I consider RFK to be pretty good, but this thread is about the existence of biological viruses, not RFK or even vaccines. I actually made a thread on RFK where your post would be more appropriate:
Scott

Thread 'A Crisis of Credibility [Controversy over RFK Jr.'s work]'

I know there are a -few- people here who question the Covid 19 vaccines, at least for children. John Leake, the author of this article I link to below is much more than simply -skeptical- of the Covid 19 vaccines, and it looks like he understands the feelings of people like me who think they should be banned as soon as possible. But he points out that many people still believe in these vaccines and thus RFK Jr's first focusing on chemicals in junk food. He also thinks that it would be better to first work on banning the Covid 19 vaccines for kids, as that is the weakest link of this...
  • Like
 
Matt Dillon said:
I just got a virus a couple days ago, so..
It was bad. I had a cup of coffee and headed to the store to get something, and it hit me halfway there.
I got my stuff, came home, threw it in the fridge, then was down for a day and a half.
It was pretty bad, and I'm pretty immune to a lot of things.
Click to expand...

How do you know what caused your being down for a day and a half was caused by a biological virus?
 
Matt Dillon said:
iu
Click to expand...

This right here makes me think your posts on this subject may not be worth responding to and part of the reason I decided to create a thread in Above Plain Politics to avoid this type of noise. For those who'd like to discuss this subject without these types of base insults, I made a thread on the same subject here:
Scott

APP - Thread 'Do biological viruses actually exist?'

I made a thread that basically had the same premise as this one back in 2022. It had a good run, but then petered off for a long time. It's recently gotten a bit of a renewal, but I've come to believe that this is a subject that will get a lot of people to engage in personal attacks. I was hoping to avoid that this time around and this is the reason that I'm remaking this thread here. Note that I am not saying that the electron microscope photographs that virologists present aren't real microbes, just that they don't actually have the properties that would fit the definition of biological...
 
Scott said:
This right here makes me think your posts on this subject may not be worth responding to and part of the reason I decided to create a thread in Above Plain Politics to avoid this type of noise. For those who'd like to discuss this subject without these types of base insults, I made a thread on the same subject here:
Scott

APP - Thread 'Do biological viruses actually exist?'

I made a thread that basically had the same premise as this one back in 2022. It had a good run, but then petered off for a long time. It's recently gotten a bit of a renewal, but I've come to believe that this is a subject that will get a lot of people to engage in personal attacks. I was hoping to avoid that this time around and this is the reason that I'm remaking this thread here. Note that I am not saying that the electron microscope photographs that virologists present aren't real microbes, just that they don't actually have the properties that would fit the definition of biological...
Click to expand...
iu
 
IBDaMann said:
Scott said:
At one point, he even suggested that my belief that biological viruses might not be real might be correct.
Click to expand...
Yes. When we speak about "viruses", we are assuming a particular model that might be discarded tomorrow for some new model, and there is nothing preventing you from being the person who develops that new model.
Click to expand...

The notion that biological viruses aren't causing the deaths attributed to them certainly isn't mine. It looks like there has been controversy about whether biological viruses actually exist since the concept of biological viruses were introduced. Mike Stone, one of the signatories of the "Settling the Virus Debate" 2 page statement that I reference in the opening post of this thread, has a lot of articles that I think are quite good at pointing out the flaws in virology. Here's one written about a year ago that you may find interesting:
viroliegy.com

ViroLIEgy 101: Logical Fallacies

The flawed reasoning ingrained within the foundations of virology has infected the minds of those who consider themselves rational thinkers. ViroLIEgy 101 is a series of articles meant to provide relatively short (by my standards) and concise explanations of key concepts regarding both germ...
viroliegy.com viroliegy.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top