she stood in front of 15 kids and took the bullets

she bought a completely unfunctional manchild the weapons which he then killed the neighbors children with.

that is just fine with you gun nutters
 
Inbstead you blame everyone else for not supplying the school with an even MORE massive arsenal.

why ?

because the gun industry tells you to think that

I wonder why that is THEIR plan?
 
If a story involves a black person who did something wrong and someone asks who you think this person voted for Desh goes apoplectic. But if it's a white person that commits a crime and Desh thinks she can score a point by asking who they voted for then she has no problem with it.

Good to see your transparency once again Desh.

So the bolded is untrue Desh?
 
money money money money money money.

people mean nothing to you guys and money is the only thing that matters
 
so we cant stop crazy people from buying guns but schools have to become war zones to please the crazy people who want guns.


what happens when guns are present ?

people get shot.

what you guys want is the gun already in the school so the nutter doesn't even have to bring his own

It's the libertarian way with everything, except abortion, then we must pass a fetal rights amendment. But everything else is allowed, more guns, more money because it is speech, more drugs, more alcohol in fact just more of everything and see what happens. Look how hard it is to get them to bring even the barest bit of moderation to this place. Except of course in those rare instances when 5-6 posts from the past get brought forward by one or two posters on a Sunday afternoon. Then alarms go off and something has to be done.
 
And if they were carrying guns, they'd turn you into swiss cheese. With many other innocent people killed in the cross fire.

For some reason this possibility never seems to enter the minds of the nutters; in their world a person always pulls a gun and instantly ends the confrontation with a single bullet like the "Lone Ranger" or some other mid 50s Western where it only took a quick draw and one shot to kill the bad guy. Of course, the Lone Ranger never has a shoot out in a crowded movie theater in the dark either, but who cares. The fantasy is always so much cleaner than the reality is ever going to be and nutters live in a fantasy world where they are always the hero and always the get the "bad guy"!
 
you guys do know that personal insults you pull out of the depths of your colon are not facts right?

and wash your elbows that last dig was deep
 
and your a fucking seer huh?

Your just a gun nut not a prophet
unlike your dumbass, i've studied gun laws and gun law results for years. if you want to consider me a seer, so be it, but what i'm not going to do is let you be a brady campaign fucktard and 'lets pass the law and find out'.
 
you guys do know that personal insults you pull out of the depths of your colon are not facts right?

and wash your elbows that last dig was deep

Says the Queen of personal insults. Nothing worse than one who can dish it but can't take it in return.
 
hey cowack did you find your evidence of the claim you made yet?

you find any evidence that I hate teachers? Didn't think so.

So funny how you forget everything you say after you say it. Maybe that's why you have to post the same things over and over and over.
 
I cant take what I really said.

I will never allow you to just lie with impunity asshole.

GO GET THE PROOF I SAID WHAT YOU CLAIMED asshole
 
That's a total crock of bullshit. Guns aren't the problem. Crazy fucks having access to them are! Try focusing on the real issue here Damo.

You didn't read the post, Mott. The reality is he didn't have access to those guns, he stole them after killing their owner. What new law you propose would have stopped him from shooting the owner of the guns and stealing them? And once again, which portion of the "no guns zone" fixed this problem? What part of denying this portion of the population their rights helped them?
 
Back
Top