Should Iran Be Sanctioned?

Should Iran Be Sanctioned

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 41.7%
  • No

    Votes: 4 33.3%
  • I am unsure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Depends on the type of sanctions

    Votes: 3 25.0%

  • Total voters
    12
This is an irrational fear issue. They are many many years from developing even enough technology to use uranium as fuel, dispite what they claim.

.

I feel so much better now that I know Jarod has been there and inspected their facilities.....
 
Screw Israel. That nation was build by Zionists who were acting to fulfill biblical prophecy, By taking away the land of the nation of Palestine who were there long before they were.

hmmm.....would it be better for the US to protect Israel or protect wanderingbear.....sorry dude, you don't even warrant a coin toss.....
 
That's exactly what teabaggers said about me in the run up to your Iraq war. In retrospect, who's judgement was far more accurate...yours, or mine?
theirs.....you STILL don't get it.....

Until then, I'm for continuing to keep the IAEA inspectors in the country

yeah, cause they're right on top of things...

Perhaps most striking about it all is how fast it all occurred: between the time that Iran notified the IAEA in writing of its plans (Feb. 8, Monday) and began to move LEU to higher enrich (Feb 9, Tuesday) was 24 hours. Iran did wait for IAEA inspectors to arrive at the Natanz fuel enrichment plant Tuesday before moving 10 KG of low enriched uranium from the Natanz fuel enrichment plant to the pilot enrichment facility.

But note that when Agency inspectors arrived at the pilot facility the next morning (yesterday, February 10th), Iran informed them that they had begun work there the previous evening on a process called passivation (Lewis explains what that is). The IAEA inspectors "were also that told that it was expected that the facility would begin to produce up to 20% enriched Uf6 within a few days.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/0210/IAEA_report_on_Iran.html?showall

I see no evidence of this impending, or future nuclear attack from Iran on Kansas City, that teabagging fearmongers want me to see.
cuz' lord knows....if it doesn't involve Kansas City, it doesn't matter to the US....
 
I disagree....I believe the spending spree that the government has been on the last year will have a negative impact on the US economy for the next thirty years.....

the debt will last longer than 30 years

it will last until other nations decide to use the yuan instead of the dollar, then the u s of a will go belly up

then there will be another depression

but maybe china will go belly up first - they have too many young adult males without a chance of finding a bride...some 25 million of them, this usually means war or revoultion
 
the debt will last longer than 30 years

it will last until other nations decide to use the yuan instead of the dollar, then the u s of a will go belly up

then there will be another depression

but maybe china will go belly up first - they have too many young adult males without a chance of finding a bride...some 25 million of them, this usually means war or revoultion

Or a big infusion of gay bars. :cof1:
 
Back
Top