Should parents be licensed?

[USFREEDOM911]

Is it time that parents be required to be licensed?

There are sites that give estimates that around 5 children die from abuse, EVERY SINGLE DAY in the US.

Is it time for COMPREHENSIVE PARENT CONTROL?

Should people who want to be parents be expected to pass a background check, have to apply for a permit, be required to attend parenting classes, have to pass a proficiency test, etc; for every child they want to have, before they're allowed to have them?

If YES, why?
If NO, why?

 

[PostmodernProphet]

this is serious......a recent study revealed that 100% of those who committed murder in terrorist attacks HAD PARENTS!.......

 

[Irish Exit]

Is it time that parents be required to be licensed?

There are sites that give estimates that around 5 children die from abuse, EVERY SINGLE DAY in the US.

Is it time for COMPREHENSIVE PARENT CONTROL?

Should people who want to be parents be expected to pass a background check, have to apply for a permit, be required to attend parenting classes, have to pass a proficiency test, etc; for every child they want to have, before they're allowed to have them?

If YES, why?
If NO, why?

Only if your house had, at any point in time, axles and a tongue.

 

[domer76]

Is it time that parents be required to be licensed?

There are sites that give estimates that around 5 children die from abuse, EVERY SINGLE DAY in the US.

Is it time for COMPREHENSIVE PARENT CONTROL?

Should people who want to be parents be expected to pass a background check, have to apply for a permit, be required to attend parenting classes, have to pass a proficiency test, etc; for every child they want to have, before they're allowed to have them?

If YES, why?
If NO, why?

OK, folks. The saying goes that there is no such thing as a stupid question, but the RW fucktards on this forum prove that old saw is false. This is another classic example.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Only if your house had, at any point in time, axles and a tongue.

Your reply was a non sequitur.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

OK, folks. The saying goes that there is no such thing as a stupid question, but the RW fucktards on this forum prove that old saw is false. This is another classic example.

Your reply was a non sequitur.

 

[countryboy]

Is it time that parents be required to be licensed?

There are sites that give estimates that around 5 children die from abuse, EVERY SINGLE DAY in the US.

Is it time for COMPREHENSIVE PARENT CONTROL?

Should people who want to be parents be expected to pass a background check, have to apply for a permit, be required to attend parenting classes, have to pass a proficiency test, etc; for every child they want to have, before they're allowed to have them?

If YES, why?
If NO, why?

Of course not. Why should we punish good parents for the actions of the irresponsible? That would be akin to "common sense gun control". The punishing of the law abiding for the actions of the criminal.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Of course not. Why should we punish good parents for the actions of the irresponsible? That would be akin to "common sense gun control". The punishing of the law abiding for the actions of the criminal.

But if it saves the life of one child, where's the harm and how is it a punishment?

 

[countryboy]

But if it saves the life of one child, where's the harm and how is it a punishment?

Can't tell if you're serious, I'm thinking you are using hyperbole in an attempt to make some sort of point. Why not just make your point?

Since when are free nations in the business of "allowing" their citizens to procreate?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Can't tell if you're serious, I'm thinking you are using hyperbole in an attempt to make some sort of point. Why not just make your point?

Since when are free nations in the business of "allowing" their citizens to procreate?

I am interested if any of our JPP liberals feel that this would stop child abuse.

 

[Irish Exit]

Your reply was a non sequitur.

No it was not. I believe in selective regulation. Screw equal protection.

 

[Irish Exit]

Your reply was a non sequitur.

No it was not. I believe in selective regulation. Screw equal protection.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Can't tell if you're serious, I'm thinking you are using hyperbole in an attempt to make some sort of point. Why not just make your point?

Since when are free nations in the business of "allowing" their citizens to procreate?

we've told you a million times, USF does not use hyperbole........

 

[countryboy]

we've told you a million times, USF does not use hyperbole........

Lol. Who knew "real conservatives" advocated tyrannical state tactics.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

No it was not. I believe in selective regulation. Screw equal protection.

Your reply was a non sequitur.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

No it was not. I believe in selective regulation. Screw equal protection.

You've become little miss echo and your reply was a non sequitur.

 

[Irish Exit]

You've become little miss echo and your reply was a non sequitur.

The question was should parents be licensed. I answered. That it wasn't the answer you wanted or agree with does not make it a non sequitur.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

The question was should parents be licensed. I answered. That it wasn't the answer you wanted or agree with does not make it a non sequitur.

it was unless your answer had axles and a tongue.....

 

[Irish Exit]

it was unless your answer had axles and a tongue.....

Sorry you want to avoid the reality that people who live in trailer parks shouldn't be allowed to have children.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

OK, folks. The saying goes that there is no such thing as a stupid question, but the RW fucktards on this forum prove that old saw is false. This is another classic example.

Okay Howey. Your trolling does not answer the question though....