Should Trump supporters be removed from society?

Damocles said:
Do these people actually read what they are posting? In what part of America do we "remove" folks with a different opinion?

I mean.. dayum...
Click to expand...

I was suggesting voluntary free night school classes for critical thinking...this is something else..
Whatever it is, it's the opposite of liberal.
 
Last edited:
Into the Night said:
Fascism is a form of socialism. Socialism is theft of wealth. There are three basic forms:

Communism is government ownership of markets (and companies).
Fascism is government manipulation of markets (companies are left in private ownership, but told when and what to buy, sell, and who they must hire and fire).
Slavery is theft of wealth directly, via 'ownership' of people.

You are correct that fascism is on the road to communism. It is socialism, nevertheless. It is still theft of wealth.

Only capitalism creates wealth. Socialism cannot exist without capitalism, since it must have someone to steal from.

Since socialism is theft of wealth, it can only be implemented by dictatorships and oligarchies (a slave master is a dictator).
Click to expand...

Nope.
Fascism achieved better economic results than Capitalism if anything.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
A purge of 74,000,000 trumpanzees would be, by a huge margin, the most massive purge in the history of humanity.

I'm not opposed to it--in fact the thought of it is quite comforting to imagine--but I've no idea how it could be accomplished.

That's why partition has been my proposes solution.

Other nations have managed that.

If you think reconciliation is the answer, find a safer drug dealer--you've got some bad stuff there.
Click to expand...

You got the ass to make it happen, pussy?
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Nope.
Fascism achieved better economic results than Capitalism if anything.
Click to expand...

Until capitalists killed them all for "achieving better economic results" by murdering their own people and stealing what they had. (and then attacking the capitalists)

That's not a exactly a peaceful or sustainable government plan. And it didn't last even 1 decade.
Fascism is not a recipe for success.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Until capitalists killed them all for "achieving better economic results" by murdering people and stealing what they had.

That's not a exactly a peaceful or sustainable government plan.
Click to expand...

Soviets are most responsible for taking out Nazi Germany.
Ironically after Soviet resources made the early Nazi War effort proficient.

Besides, British Empire Capitalsts killed on every continent.
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Soviets are most responsible for taking out Nazi Germany.
Ironically after Soviet resources made the early Nazi War effort proficient.

Besides, British Empire Capitalsts killed on every continent.
Click to expand...

That don't befront me.
Russians don't have a good standard of living to this day.
Hitler and Mussolini are long dead, as is their ways of government.
So did Russians storm Normandy? No? Oh! How 'bout that!
They came in from the other side after a lot of war-deciding battles had already happened.
They also did real evil to German civilians. Real personal evil vs. carpetbombing with fire.
Do note: British Empire Capitalists were stopped and kicked off of the American continent. (Except Canada)
 
Matt Dillon said:
That don't befront me.
Russians don't have a good standard of living to this day.
Hitler and Mussolini are long dead, as is their ways of government.
So did Russians storm Normandy? No? Oh! How 'bout that!
They came in from the other side after a lot of war-deciding battles had already happened.
They also did real evil to German civilians. Real personal evil vs. carpetbombing with fire.
Click to expand...

About 80% of Nazi deaths came from the Eastern front.

Soviets liberated most of the concentration camps. Including Auschwitz.

Soviets captured Berlin first.
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Soviets are most responsible for taking out Nazi Germany.
Click to expand...
WRONG. The Allied forces are responsible for taking out Nazi Germany. Under General Patton, Eisenhower, and even to a certain extent Montgomery, destroyed the bulk of the German forces in France and Holland. Russian forces invaded Berlin, then took it for communism, another form of socialism (Remember the Wall?).
Jan Sobieski said:
Ironically after Soviet resources made the early Nazi War effort proficient.
Click to expand...
War is not socialism or capitalism. The Soviets never commanded Nazi anything.
Jan Sobieski said:
Besides, British Empire Capitalsts killed on every continent.
Click to expand...
Yes. To put down communism and fascism or to implement their own flavor of it.
 
Into the Night said:
WRONG. The Allied forces are responsible for taking out Nazi Germany. Under General Patton, Eisenhower, and even to a certain extent Montgomery, destroyed the bulk of the German forces in France and Holland. Russian forces invaded Berlin, then took it for communism, another form of socialism (Remember the Wall?).

War is not socialism or capitalism. The Soviets never commanded Nazi anything.

Yes. To put down communism and fascism or to implement their own flavor of it.
Click to expand...

Lmao.
Everyone with a proper education knows Soviets did the most to defeat Hitler & the British Empire killed an enormous amount in the name of greed.
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Lmao.
Everyone with a proper education knows Soviets did the most to defeat Hitler & the British Empire killed an enormous amount in the name of greed.
Click to expand...

So Russia stopped the U-boats from patrolling the seas, boy? :rolleyes:

I'm more inclined to believe that was the U.S. Navy and depth charges.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top