should you back your claims with facts?

Why? Rightys would not be able to post if that was a requirement. Insults and name calling, with cross talking is not information or fact. But they will not stop doing it. It is all they have. Ironically , they often demand proof from lefties but don't offer any of their own.
 
Why? Rightys would not be able to post if that was a requirement. Insults and name calling, with cross talking is not information or fact. But they will not stop doing it. It is all they have. Ironically , they often demand proof from lefties but don't offer any of their own.


Bingo that
 
Why? Rightys would not be able to post if that was a requirement. Insults and name calling, with cross talking is not information or fact. But they will not stop doing it. It is all they have. Ironically , they often demand proof from lefties but don't offer any of their own.

Cross talking? Says the poster who doesn't know how to use the Reply With Quote button?
 
one idiot tells me to do my own research every time I ask him for a citiation of facts to back his claims
 
Russiagate Is More Fiction Than Fact
Thread Tools
Search Thread

Rate This Thread
Display
Today,*08:54 AM
#46 | Top
noise
Verified User

Join Date
Jul 2017
Posts
4,328
Thanks
1,226
Thanked 1,671 Times in 1,278 Posts
Groans
26
Groaned 235 Times in 224 Posts



Originally Posted by evince
link????
do your own research for once, I'm sure wiki has some thing for you.
Comey described it as “salacious and unverified” in testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee
 
It depends what you are posting. If you give your opinion, it is just that. If you proclaim some facts, back them up.

As you can probably tell the term facts, as being used by the OP, means data or information that supports a position or belief she already holds.

If you agree with her you like facts if you don't agree with her you don't like facts.
 
Back
Top