should you back your claims with facts?

[evince]

There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.
The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.
"Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood," he said.


https://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

 

[Русский агент]

wack go get one case of your example for proof

Link up to your proof of this claim, skank:

Nope there was a recent study done and republicans are far more racist than black people

 

[Русский агент]

There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy. The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience. "Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood," he said.

So you've been stupid all your life, rayciss.

Anyone who would say the things you do is obviously not intelligent.

I spit in the face of the black guy.

Obama was nothing more than another black failure in a government job and another black family in government housing. Stupid nigger.

If you're black and you vote democrat, then you're a "nigger". If you're white and you vote democrat, then you're "white trash". If you're Asian and you vote democrat, then you're a "zipper head". If you're Hispanic and you vote democrat, then you're a "wetback".

Why do you hate minorities, skank?

 

[Русский агент]

go get the post where I refused to give you a link to a fact I claimed. dont come back to this site until you have that post, its thread title and the post number goodbye for ever

You made this claim in a thread titled "Black Conservatives and the Zimmerman Case".

It is post # 173 in that thread.

Nope there was a recent study done and republicans are far more racist than black people

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

one idiot tells me to do my own research every time I ask him for a citation of facts to back his claims

I used to argue with 9/11 'truthers' on the Amazon Politics forum. They would make a claim such as: "The New World Order was behind it." I would ask for evidence, and the reply came back "Do your own research."

 

[Русский агент]

I used to argue with 9/11 'truthers' on the Amazon Politics forum. They would make a claim such as: "The New World Order was behind it." I would ask for evidence, and the reply came back "Do your own research."

Cool story.

Let's see your proof.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Cool story.

Let's see your proof.

Are you serious? Like I said, this was on the AMAZON Politics forum.

Judging by my experience there, most 'truthers' these days are RWNJs, way-out libertarians and such.

 

[Русский агент]

Are you serious? Like I said, this was on the AMAZON Politics forum. Judging by my experience there, most 'truthers' these days are RWNJs, way-out libertarians and such.

No proof? No truth.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

No proof? No truth.

Amazon Politics is down the memory hole, as I'm sure you know.

 

[Русский агент]

Amazon Politics is down the memory hole, as I'm sure you know.

How convenient. Perhaps you shouldn't make claims if you have no evidence. It's ironic that you chose this thread to do so.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

There was one extreme RWNJ called Happy who insisted that liberals were behind the 9/11 attacks, the Sandy Hook 'hoax', and every other conspiracy you can think of. He was convinced that Trump was going reveal the truth about all this. Happy was probably too much of a nutjob even for you.

 

[Русский агент]

There was one extreme RWNJ called Happy who insisted that liberals were behind the 9/11 attacks, the Sandy Hook 'hoax', and every other conspiracy you can think of. He was convinced that Trump was going reveal the truth about all this. Happy was probably too much of a nutjob even for you.

So you say, but cannot prove.

How do I know you weren't "Happy" posting under a alias?

How do I know you didn't make "Happy" up?

 

[Jade Dragon]

There was one extreme RWNJ called Happy who insisted that liberals were behind the 9/11 attacks, the Sandy Hook 'hoax', and every other conspiracy you can think of. He was convinced that Trump was going reveal the truth about all this. Happy was probably too much of a nutjob even for you.

Won't miss that rancid walnut. One of the few posters who could write off them masturbating, as an act of charity. Give him a medal, because the gene pool thanks him.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

How convenient. Perhaps you shouldn't make claims if you have no evidence.

When I say that Trump is a compulsive, transparent liar, I can point to a mountain of evidence ...

In 298 days, President Trump has made 1,628 false and misleading claims - the Fact Checker’s ongoing database of the false and misleading claims made by President Trump.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...ms-database/?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.f023024719e1

There is simply no precedent for an American president to spend so much time telling untruths. Every president has shaded the truth or told occasional whoppers. No other president — of either party — has behaved as Trump is behaving. He is trying to create an atmosphere in which reality is irrelevant.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html

Donald Trump brings to the equation an apparent disregard for fact so profound as to suggest that he may not see much practical distinction between lies, if he believes they serve him, and the truth. He targets the darkness, anger and insecurity that hide in each of us and harnesses them for his own purposes. If one of his lies doesn’t work — well, then he lies about that.
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-why-trump-lies/

In a war, terrorist attack or other crisis, it's vital for the president to have some credibility with the citizenry. Trump won't. If and when that moment arrives, most Americans will assume they are being misled. Trump will then find that his habit of lying has made him a loser.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...mp-pathetic-lies-perspec-20170804-column.html

 

[Nordberg]

I am sorry, but a rule like that would be unfair to the rightys. Can't have a rule like that. We would wind up with only liberal posting.

 

[Русский агент]

When I say that Trump is a compulsive, transparent liar, I can point to a mountain of evidence ...In 298 days, President Trump has made 1,628 false and misleading claims - the Fact Checker’s ongoing database of the false and misleading claims made by President Trump. There is simply no precedent for an American president to spend so much time telling untruths. Every president has shaded the truth or told occasional whoppers. No other president — of either party — has behaved as Trump is behaving. He is trying to create an atmosphere in which reality is irrelevant. Donald Trump brings to the equation an apparent disregard for fact so profound as to suggest that he may not see much practical distinction between lies, if he believes they serve him, and the truth. He targets the darkness, anger and insecurity that hide in each of us and harnesses them for his own purposes. If one of his lies doesn’t work — well, then he lies about that. In a war, terrorist attack or other crisis, it's vital for the president to have some credibility with the citizenry. Trump won't. If and when that moment arrives, most Americans will assume they are being misled. Trump will then find that his habit of lying has made him a loser.

Your word salad has nothing to do with your anecdotal claims.

I used to argue with 9/11 'truthers' on the Amazon Politics forum. They would make a claim such as: "The New World Order was behind it." I would ask for evidence, and the reply came back "Do your own research."

There was one extreme RWNJ called Happy who insisted that liberals were behind the 9/11 attacks, the Sandy Hook 'hoax', and every other conspiracy you can think of. He was convinced that Trump was going reveal the truth about all this. Happy was probably too much of a nutjob even for you.

 

[Русский агент]

I am sorry, but a rule like that would be unfair to the rightys. Can't have a rule like that. We would wind up with only liberal posting.

Ironic, since I have identified three unproven claims by liberal in this thread alone, and I have provided citations for each.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Your word salad has nothing to do with your anecdotal claims.

God bless, I don't care whether you believe or disbelieve that there was a RWNJ called Happy who posted on conspiracy threads at amazon.com Politics. Anyone who was there knows it.

More important is for people like you to recognize that Trump is a compulsive, transparent liar - for which there is a mountain of evidence. I notice you ignored it.

 

[Nordberg]

Proved my point.

 

[CFM]

or is that only for people on the left

People on the left consider that it came out of their mouth the same as proof.