Shouldn't we be at full employment by now?

Never did go short today. Looks like I would have gotten stopped out at 1840 anyway.

1850 is the next level I am watching. To go long.

Did you buy PSQ? If not totally understand. But keep an eye on it

One thing is for sure and that is we are headed for lots of
Volatility.
 
I Love America said:
So the demalquedacrats say that extending long term unemployment benefits creates jobs.

Well we have been doing it since 2008. Can anyone explain why we aren't at full employment yet?

And please spare me the "Its Bush's fault"
Click to expand...

Obviously you haven't been paying attention to what's been going on in this country since Obama took office.....like the House Republicans BLOCKING or DELAYING or DILUTING any and every piece of legislation from this administration when it comes to jobs. Or how corporations have been "reluctant" to start hiring, claiming that they await positive signs from Wall St. or Washington (but they sure as hell kept outsourcing, and lobby to protect those tax credits for such). Or maybe you bought into the BS by the GOP with regards to their plan for job creation. Here, for your education:

Fact Checking The Republican Lies About Job Creation


 
Taichiliberal said:
Obviously you haven't been paying attention to what's been going on in this country since Obama took office.....like the House Republicans BLOCKING or DELAYING or DILUTING any and every piece of legislation from this administration when it comes to jobs. Or how corporations have been "reluctant" to start hiring, claiming that they await positive signs from Wall St. or Washington (but they sure as hell kept outsourcing, and lobby to protect those tax credits for such). Or maybe you bought into the BS by the GOP with regards to their plan for job creation. Here, for your education:

Fact Checking The Republican Lies About Job Creation


Click to expand...

Yeah yeah we know. Nothing is ever Obamas fault.
 
The Dude said:
No moves for me today, I'm in the red on all my stocks. To much trading.
Click to expand...

Yeah. I did that early on too. I felt I had to be actively trading in order to do well. Bottom line is that guys like us will never keep up with Goldman Sachs and their super computers that make a gazillion trades a minute. I am just happy to get my little slice.

In a sideways market like this, covered calls are a good option so you can generate income. There are covered call ETFs but I don't recall them off the top of my head.

I am content to stay on the sidelines while this sorts itself out
 
I Love America said:
So the demalquedacrats say that extending long term unemployment benefits creates jobs.

Well we have been doing it since 2008. Can anyone explain why we aren't at full employment yet?

And please spare me the "Its Bush's fault"
Click to expand...

GOPNo.png


youve-had-your-tax-breaks-where-are-the-jobs.jpeg


128Bce.SlMa_.91.jpg
 
I Love America said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Obviously you haven't been paying attention to what's been going on in this country since Obama took office.....like the House Republicans BLOCKING or DELAYING or DILUTING any and every piece of legislation from this administration when it comes to jobs. Or how corporations have been "reluctant" to start hiring, claiming that they await positive signs from Wall St. or Washington (but they sure as hell kept outsourcing, and lobby to protect those tax credits for such). Or maybe you bought into the BS by the GOP with regards to their plan for job creation. Here, for your education:

Fact Checking The Republican Lies About Job Creation


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KfzdKZ7Ya6w



Yeah yeah we know. Nothing is ever Obamas fault.
Click to expand...

See folks, when these neocon/teabagger blowhards are faced with FACTS that they cannot deny, they just IGNORE what they don't like and continue to parrot slogans and right wing rhetoric.
 
Taichiliberal said:
See folks, when these neocon/teabagger blowhards are faced with FACTS that they cannot deny, they just IGNORE what they don't like and continue to parrot slogans and right wing rhetoric.
Click to expand...


Unemployment in 2006 before democrat party took over Congress was 4.5%

That's a fact jack.

I knew a Taichiliberal on AOL a long time ago. He was a dumb fuck too
 
I Love America said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
See folks, when these neocon/teabagger blowhards are faced with FACTS that they cannot deny, they just IGNORE what they don't like and continue to parrot slogans and right wing rhetoric.
Click to expand...

Unemployment in 2006 before democrat party took over Congress was 4.5%

That's a fact jack.

I knew a Taichiliberal on AOL a long time ago. He was a dumb fuck too
Click to expand...

I asked you to logically disprove one item in the source material I linked.

You couldn't, so you just blew smoke and are now moving the goalpost with your cherry picked fact.

Here, let me educate you (yet again) on the unemployment situation and how it got there.

CHART: Bush Vs. Obama On Private And Public Sector Job Creation

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/06/01/493849/obama-bush-jobs-record/
 
Taichiliberal said:
I asked you to logically disprove one item in the source material I linked.

You couldn't, so you just blew smoke and are now moving the goalpost with your cherry picked fact.

Here, let me educate you (yet again) on the unemployment situation and how it got there.

CHART: Bush Vs. Obama On Private And Public Sector Job Creation

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/06/01/493849/obama-bush-jobs-record/
Click to expand...


Sorry, I don't read left wing claptrap from left wing hacks. Fact unemployment in 2006 was 4.5%. Seems like tax cuts worked.

That's a fact jack.

If you don't like it tough titties. You don't get to define the terms on what I discuss.
 
I Love America said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I asked you to logically disprove one item in the source material I linked.

You couldn't, so you just blew smoke and are now moving the goalpost with your cherry picked fact.

Here, let me educate you (yet again) on the unemployment situation and how it got there.

CHART: Bush Vs. Obama On Private And Public Sector Job Creation

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...h-jobs-record/
Click to expand...


Sorry, I don't read left wing claptrap from left wing hacks. Fact unemployment in 2006 was 4.5%. Seems like tax cuts worked.

That's a fact jack.

If you don't like it tough titties. You don't get to define the terms on what I discuss.
Click to expand...

The only thing you should be sorry about is your proud ignorance! Willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger blowhards like yourself are only interested in headlines and talking points, NOT details. Fortunately, the majority of the country is not like you...which is why the GOP is feeling the heat for the upcoming elections.

Here's a hint for you, bunky: Which President inherited an economic mandate that resulted in a Wall St. meltdown, criminal activity by bankers, a stonewall Congress, non-hiring corporations and a bill for two wars?

Now with all that, did you really think the unemployment rate would remain low? If so, then there's nothing I can do with you, so you may continue to parrot your talking point oblivious to all else.
 
Teabaggers fall back on unemployment because all the other economic numbers are better.
They never said dick about unemployment as bush ran it up to 9 percent.
 
Taichiliberal said:
The only thing you should be sorry about is your proud ignorance! Willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger blowhards like yourself are only interested in headlines and talking points, NOT details. Fortunately, the majority of the country is not like you...which is why the GOP is feeling the heat for the upcoming elections.

Here's a hint for you, bunky: Which President inherited an economic mandate that resulted in a Wall St. meltdown, criminal activity by bankers, a stonewall Congress, non-hiring corporations and a bill for two wars?

Now with all that, did you really think the unemployment rate would remain low? If so, then there's nothing I can do with you, so you may continue to parrot your talking point oblivious to all else.
Click to expand...

Oh right. All he inherited. That story again. I guess he didn't know what he was getting into. How many more terms do you think he needs to get things fixed?

Hey wipe off your chin you got a little Obama jizz on it
 
I Love America said:
So the demalquedacrats say that extending long term unemployment benefits creates jobs.

Well we have been doing it since 2008. Can anyone explain why we aren't at full employment yet?

And please spare me the "Its Bush's fault"
Click to expand...

Silly ILA; haven't you heard that the new leftist meme being dished out to willful fools is that there never will be a thing like "full employment", and yes, it's all the evil Republicans fault.
 
The Dude said:
Obama has attacked every industry but uneconomic alt energy!
So no we shouldn't be hitting on all cylinders with a bloated outdated gov doing all it can to stop industry!
Click to expand...

Sometimes, through the haze of your glaring ignorance, you sometimes utter coherent honest sentences.

It's quite amazing.
 
Facts don't lie
Dem presidents yield a market better by 1 percent
I don't expect poor people to understand how big that is.
Also GDP is much higher under dems.
The richest investors are dems as are the most educated.
Weasel on teabaggers, your bachelors degree isn't shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top