Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
What is it with you neocon/teabagger types and gay sex? Seems every time you're shown to be the mental midgets that you are, you start sputtering all types of gay sex accusations. Look, see that psychiatrist and get your libido problems in order. Until then, I'll wait for you to muster the cojones to actually debate the points I put forth. If you can't, I won't waste time responding again.
What is it with you mental midgets on the left who want to pretend that Obama didn't know what he was getting into when he chose to run for office, pretend that Obama didn't VOTE for all the spending and bailout bills he signed into law taking over from Bush and after five fucking years, still pretend that the malaise and failed economic policies are all Bush's fault?
Seems when your idiot compadre is made a fool of, YOU come trotting to his rescue...unfortunately your "rescue" is just a rehash of the neocon/teabagger mantras that were long ago addressed and disproved.
You wouldn't comprehend a fact if it ran into you.
Let's review your moronic claims:
Which President inherited an economic mandate that resulted in a Wall St. meltdown
What economic mandate are you referring to shit--for-brains? Obviously you haven't even the remotest clue or you wouldn't type such moronic stupidity.
You're repeating yourself...and since I already provided a fact based source that addresses your question, all you're doing is demonstrating your stubborn willful ignorance.
Debate what? A fabricated strawman claim not based on anything reality? Dunce.
Indeed, YOU are NOT debating...merely avoiding the facts I source to back up what I state, and then blather on with your tired, disproved Limbaugh inspired drivel and lame attempts at insults.
criminal activity by bankers
I am not sure what bankers were jailed for any criminal activity; but what the fuck does this have to do with Bush? NOTHING you simple minded fool.
So you admit your lack of knowledge, but proudly continue to spout your ignorant opinions...oblivious to the relevance of the discussion. But hope springs eternal....here's something to bring you up to speed:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/20/b...iht-prexy.4.16321064.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/26987291/.../t/bush-signs-billion-financial-bailout-bill/
a stonewall Congress
This is my favorite stupid and repugnant claim; for Obama's first two years he had a majority and passed just about every Liberal wet dream he could sign.
Once again, you buy into the lies of Limbaugh (or whatever right wingnut punditry you adhere to). If you READ HISTORY CAREFULLY, you'll note that the democrats NEVER HAD THE SENATE MAJORITY. President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support hisagenda. He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Franken's election in Minnesota and he didn't get seated for seven months. The President's cause was helped in April when Pennsylvania's Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties. That gave the President 59 votes - still a vote shy of the super majority.
But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission. So while the President's number on paper was 59 Senators - he was really working with just 58 Senators. Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 - but only in theory because, Senator Byrd was still out. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-m-granholm/debunking-the-myth-obamas_b_1929869.html
And let's not forget that little DINO cretin Sen. Lieberman. (look that one up yourself, as I tire of doing homework for the willfully ignorant)
In August, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts died and the number went back down to 59 again until Paul Kirk temporarily filled Kennedy's seat in September. Any pretense of a super-majority ended on February 4, 2010 when Republican Scott Brown was sworn into the seat Senator Kennedy once held.
But the real utter stupidity is this claim that he is being stonewalled; no he is not you dunce. Just because the Republicans don't bend over and take it in the ass by your Messiah doesn't make it stonewalling you epic dunce.
See the above response, which makes your childish rant all the more pathetic.
But I am amused by the equally stupid Liberal argument that the Republicans should pass another pork laden unfunded $450 billion boondoggle euphemistically called a "jobs bill" because idiots like you and Obama think that $450 billion will now do what the previous $850 could not. That isn't merely stupid you repugnant dunce, it is mentally retarded.
It's interesting how you continually use the words "dunce" and "retarded" while YOUR writings a brilliant demonstrations of those words. Once again, facts put your silly Limbaugh lamentations to rest: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...eir-jobs-bill/2011/10/19/gIQAgX4GzL_blog.html
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/gops-claim-house-passed-30-jobs-bills-bogus
non-hiring corporations
This one is funny; yeah you incredibly ill-informed dimwit, corporations are deliberately trying to go out of business just because they don't like Obama.
Like I said, dunces like you wouldn't know a fact if it ran your sorry uninformed ass over.
So all YOU have is your personal BELIEF...while I have FACTS (that you will either ignore or just squawk your Limbaugh lies louder at).
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/05/07/479130/record-corporate-profits/
a bill for two wars
Another of my favorite moronic leftist meme's; the suggestion that one gets a bill for two wars and pay as they go; two wars that Democratic leaders were all in for and whom the American people supported. But now you want to pretend that the ONLY person on planet earth who was for it was Bush. You're a retard of epic proportions.
But it is equal to the incredible stupidity by uninformed ignoramuses like you who think that wars are fought with surpluses. Please show me one dumbass.
If you want to see one dumbass, go look in the mirror. Your painful lack of knowledge as to how Congress funds military actions (i.e., wars) is only surpassed by your proud ignorance. Here stupid, for your education: http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/do...a-paying-for-iraq-war-on-credit-was-a-mistake
Now please crawl back into that dark hole you came out of and where the DNC spoon feeds you these moronic talking points you like to parrot like a trained circus monkey asshole; spare us more of your glaring ignorance and special brand of stupid.
