Simple solutions to school shootings

Not to be callus, an AR-15 style rifle (Smith & Wesson M&P 15 .223) that Cruz had and a straight out AR-15 ARE STILL ASSAULT RIFLES THAT WOULD HAVE NOT BEEN AVAILABLE HAD THE AWB BEEN IN EFFECT. Remember, the AR-15 was designed for military training...an ASSAULT RIFLE CLASSIFICATION GIVEN BY MANUFACTURER AND MILITARY. And quite frankly, the small difference in classification is of little comfort to the families of the 17 victims in Florida.

I agree with you regarding the FBI and local cops, BUT if the AWB was in place, their competence would never had to be tested.

Do you think people didn't own ARs from 1994-2004? Do you think people didn't buy new ones during that time?
 
It is done by a buy back. That will clean up a lot of them. Some gun molesters will never give them up. they will break the law and convince themselves they are doing a patriotic duty.

not some, but hundreds of thousands. it IS a patriotic duty, despite your willingness to be a slave to the state. I ask, how many lives are worth killing/dying for you to obtain your objective?
 
Don’t stop there. Monitor EVERY purchase of ammunition just like the purchase of a weapon. Set a limit.

Product liability is next.

First things first.....license an register all weapons like cars....this means taking CLASSES and passing TESTS before you get that license.
 

What you live in a fantasy world IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN. You find the mental nut cases, that's the problem wimpy

Stop and think: if there are no assault weapons to be had, then the mental nut cases can't get one. If there is proper background checks, classes and tests given before issuing that gun, you have a better chance of vetting out the nut jobs. Mind you, nothing is perfect, but my proposal sure as hell would do better than the current status quo.
 
you basically keep most of these kind of thoughts to yourself, right?
A simple mind needs to keep things simple, I understand that, but don't putt them out in public

Translation: this joker doesn't have a logical or rational or even factual means of refuting what I propose...so he just throws out childish insults. Typical.
 
Stop and think: if there are no assault weapons to be had, then the mental nut cases can't get one. If there is proper background checks, classes and tests given before issuing that gun, you have a better chance of vetting out the nut jobs. Mind you, nothing is perfect, but my proposal sure as hell would do better than the current status quo.

You act like you believe that if there are no guns available, then there will be no murders by the "mental cases"; but haven't there been mass murders committed by objects other then a firearm?
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Okay, listen up NRA flunkies and republican/conservative wonks. To prevent shootings like what recently happened in Florida, you do the following:

1. Reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban. Had this been in place, Cruz would NOT have had an AR-15 in his possession.

The assault weapons ban did not effect the number of mass shootings in any way, shape, or form and the majority of gun homicides are committed with handguns.

Of course it didn't, stupid. That's because I am referring to the MASS SHOOTINGS THAT DID OCCUR USING ASSAULT STYLE WEAPONS. A simple google of mass shootings in the last twenty years will attest to that.

2. Treat ALL weapons like an automobile.

Driving is a privlege not a right. If you want to have a homicide rate on par with western Europe then you must support the immediate deportation of all niggers and spics who are responsible for the majority of gun homicides in this country.

The "privilege" requires license and registration, you dolt. You also have to take courses and pass a competency test. That's just to operate a machine designed for transportation....NOT killing like guns do.

And of course in your racist delirium, you ignore the FACT that the VAST majority of mass shootings in the USA have been done by WHITE MEN. And the victims families don't give a damn about the numbers game you're about to play.

Obviously, you're too damn dumb and bigoted to have any type of honest, fact based discussion. Once exposed, I toss POS like you into the IA bin. Adios.
 
LOL! You think increased regulation will cut down on illegal sales? You must be new to how laws and black markets work. If you have a ban, the blackmarket will be there to pick up the slack.

So the idea that it would lower illegal sales is beyond silly.

I do support brining back AWB.

Stop and think, chuckles.....illegal guns are not exactly a walk in the part to obtain and cost a hell of a lot more than legally bought weapons. Any cop worth his salt will tell you that. So the nut jobs that have been committing mass shootings over the years WOULD NOT have had those assault rifles had the AWB been in place....nor would folk be quick to sell their weapons if they were licensed and registered like cars (accountability, ya know). That's why crooks go into states with easy gun laws, buy the guns and then sell them on the black market to those in states with tougher laws.....do some research on the "pipe line" of guns used in crimes in NYC that came from other states with far lesser gun laws.
 
So your basic premise is that an individual who so blatantly disregarded the law that he murdered 17 people... wouldn't have bought the rifle he used to commit the crime because it would have been against the law?

Take another puff and meditate some more. Do you really believe "illegal" and "unavailable" mean the same thing?

That premise can be refuted immediately. There were laws that said the school was a gun free zone. He didn't pay attention to it yet the gun haters think a law about him having one will work.
 
Stop and think: if there are no assault weapons to be had, then the mental nut cases can't get one. If there is proper background checks, classes and tests given before issuing that gun, you have a better chance of vetting out the nut jobs. Mind you, nothing is perfect, but my proposal sure as hell would do better than the current status quo.

Stop and think: If we make laws that say schools are gun free zones, the mental nut cases won't take guns on school grounds. Wait, that was in place before he took guns onto the school campus.

Oh, another one that has already deemed what he believes as the way to do things. Can you get any more arrogant you gun hating bastard?

I own FOUR of the type firearm Cruz used. If you don't think I should own them, when can I expect you to try and take them from me?
 
Stop and think: if there are no assault weapons to be had, then the mental nut cases can't get one. If there is proper background checks, classes and tests given before issuing that gun, you have a better chance of vetting out the nut jobs. Mind you, nothing is perfect, but my proposal sure as hell would do better than the current status quo.

Gun owners will not agree to anything because it's just the beginning of constant abuse by the gun lobby. You people keep talking about assault weapons, thats a negative name attached by the gun lobby, given to a gun that isn't anything other than a semi-auto rifle period. Dishonesty never brings things forward. guns don't kill people people kill people.

The gun lobby is a dishonest broker that lies constantly to prove their point. Every analogy given by the gun owners is rejected by the gun lobby. gun haters hate guns and want them ALL BANNED FOREVER THAT'S THEIR GOAL period that's a fact.

The gun lobby doesn't want a discussion they want everyones guns period.
 
Okay, listen up NRA flunkies and republican/conservative wonks. To prevent shootings like what recently happened in Florida, you do the following:

1. Reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban. Had this been in place, Cruz would NOT have had an AR-15 in his possession.

2. Treat ALL weapons like an automobile. This means that they have to be licensed and registered, and the owner has to pass a written and physical competency test. This will severely cut down on the trafficking of illegal gun sales and greatly assist in the tracking of guns used in a crime.

Got that?

We have those restrictions in place for drivers but far more people are killed in this nation in auto accidents than by gun violence. Are you sure that your proposition would work?
 
We have those restrictions in place for drivers but far more people are killed in this nation in auto accidents than by gun violence. Are you sure that your proposition would work?

1. His suggestion that an assault weapons ban would have prevented Cruz from having one works off the faulty premise that "illegal" means "unavailable".

2. His claim that licensing and registering them will cut down on the illegal trafficking of them is also faulty. It will make it worse unless he's willing to claim that all those that currently own something aren't supposed to own for whatever reason will register them because the law says so. In other words, he's arguing under the premise that criminals follow the laws.
 
Stop and think, chuckles.....illegal guns are not exactly a walk in the part to obtain and cost a hell of a lot more than legally bought weapons. Any cop worth his salt will tell you that.

Do you have a credible source that shows illegally purchased guns are more expensive than ones bought legally from the store? I could see them being slightly more expensive if they are obtained through a straw buyer. However, many of the illegal gun sales involve stolen weapons, which cost the seller nothing. Therefore, any money they get is profit.
 
Back
Top