Easy to compare. They are both food...Social Security isn't an investment program. It's a retirement insurance program. You're comparing apples and aardvarks.
Easy to compare. They are both food...Social Security isn't an investment program. It's a retirement insurance program. You're comparing apples and aardvarks.
It takes more than most people invest to actually have real money for retirement. Creating a program with a far better return would not be bad for the US.Social Security isn't an investment program. It's a retirement insurance program. You're comparing apples and aardvarks.
It takes more than most people invest to actually have real money for retirement. Creating a program with a far better return would not be bad for the US.
Apparently you are unable to argue your position against this huge wall of facts that I have presented.
Medical prices are so high because doctors and pharmacueticals have gotten sued so often that they have to raise their prices, perform unnessasary testing, or have simply gone out of business. Tort reform is required to fix that, and the Democrats have dragged their feet on that as well, as they are beholden to the trail lawyers, John Edwards being the most blatent example. Regardless: separate issue.
Medical insurance is over- regulated and is screwed up by most of the same issues.
The 5x estimate is based on a typical SS income compared to the interest income calculated in the OP.
It takes more than most people invest to actually have real money for retirement. Creating a program with a far better return would not be bad for the US.
And the one that people talk about. Nobody talks of getting rid of SS any longer except those few "stupid" people that Eisenhower spoke of. Everybody else just has opinions on how to make it work better.agreed, but how to go about it is the issue.
And the one that people talk about. Nobody talks of getting rid of SS any longer except those few "stupid" people that Eisenhower spoke of. Everybody else just has opinions on how to make it work better.
No kidding.It will become hotter when we have to start paying back what we stole from the SS surplus in a few years.
Damn our credit card government anyway.
coming up with 2 trillion or so from general revenues is going to be fun.
heck just cut off Blackwater.
Damn mercenaries anyway.
Better mercenaries than Americans dying.
I never understand the left-hate for Blackwater.
Why do you hate America ?
Yeah that makes no sense but thanks for trying old man.
I have proven that the SS program is a rip off no matter what you choose to call it. Where has all that money gone? What happened to freedom of choice? American workers do not have the abilty to opt out.Social Security isn't an investment program. It's a retirement insurance program. You're comparing apples and aardvarks.
Why not let individuals decide if they want to "invest" in SS or not? Heck, I'd opt out now if I could, and I've paid those taxes for over 30 years.I don't think it would be bad, but dismantling Social Security to do it would be bad. Social Security works. It may need some minor tweaking to ensure that projected benefits don't get cut, but it works.
I also don't think we necessarily need another government program to provide for retirement. What we have currently, with tax-favored retirement savings programs, is the way to go. Expanding those programs would be fine with me as long as you're not funneling money from SS.
I have proven that the SS program is a rip off no matter what you choose to call it. Where has all that money gone? What happened to freedom of choice? American workers do not have the abilty to opt out.
I am well aware of the "facts" as presented by some. The Bushies taught us that.
your facts are full of suppositions and estimates.
I seem to recall the war was only supposed to last 6 months at the most.