They aren't Socialist countries, Nerdberg.
And they don't have socialized medicine. The healthcare system is privately owned and operated.
They aren't Socialist countries, Nerdberg.
And they don't have socialized medicine. The healthcare system is privately owned and operated.
What exactly is your question? The Scadinavian countries have a robust middle class.
It’s one of the lowest in the EU and far lower than the USA
you are still not answering the questions.........
I don't think nationalism is healthy.
They aren't Socialist countries, and never have been.
The term "socialism" has become distorted to mean social welfare programs rather than government ownership of the means of production and distribution. Most who call themselves socialists do not advocate nationalization of major industries.
You cannot become prosperous giving everything away.
It means what it means. Only dishonest people try to pretend that Scandinavian countries are Socialist while ignoring Vietnam, Venezuela, Cuba, El Salvador, etc.
Your opinion is irrelevant regarding the topic under discussion.
It’s one of the lowest in the EU and far lower than the USA
In Finland, the index shows, the income of the highest-earning ten per cent was on an average 5.4 times as high as that of the lowest-earning ten per cent. Elsewhere in the European Union, the divide between the highest- and lowest-earning households was up to twice as wide.
http://www.helsinkitimes.fi/finland...nland-has-lowest-income-inequality-in-eu.html
What exactly is your question? The Scadinavian countries have a robust middle class.
Nationalism is always aggressive.
There is a difference...
Giving away? Medicare is funded by payroll taxes and we spend twice as much on healthcare as countries that have universal healthcare.
thank you. this answers one question. so a person making 40,000 has to contend in society with people making 216,000, and that's on average. now, do you have the information about the value/worth/income of elected officials?
Giving away? Medicare is funded by payroll taxes and we spend twice as much on healthcare as countries that have universal healthcare.
Are you claiming that the payroll taxes one pays over a working lifetime that applies to Medicare is enough to cover the costs of a person's healthcare that uses it?
Actually, the most I'm going to personally spend on my healthcare in a year is $1000. My premiums are zero as part of my compensation package and my max out out pocket is $1000. That's not a lot so where's the problem?