Somalis in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA gun down a lone White kid on his front porch.

Painting with a broad brush, eh?

'Painting with a broad brush, eh'? It's all in your twisted libtard hivemind, and it's just so fucking pathetic how your drone brains operate. I call you all hive members because, frankly, it's the perfect fit. You're all so goddamn predictable. I bet I could answer any question exactly how any of you drones would, and then mimic how you think I'd respond. But here's the kicker - you can't do the same for me. Those of us not in your little hive actually have our own minds and think for ourselves. You might believe you're thinking, but let's be real, you're out of practice. You're like the kid who can't decide how to feel about something unexpected until they look at mommy or daddy's face for guidance. That's the hive for you - emotions and thoughts dictated by the collective reaction. You can thank me later for this little insight into your underdeveloped prefrontal cortex, look it up, you'll understand where I'm coming from.
 
'Painting with a broad brush, eh'? It's all in your twisted libtard hivemind, and it's just so fucking pathetic how your drone brains operate. I call you all hive members because, frankly, it's the perfect fit. You're all so goddamn predictable. I bet I could answer any question exactly how any of you drones would, and then mimic how you think I'd respond. But here's the kicker - you can't do the same for me. Those of us not in your little hive actually have our own minds and think for ourselves. You might believe you're thinking, but let's be real, you're out of practice. You're like the kid who can't decide how to feel about something unexpected until they look at mommy or daddy's face for guidance. That's the hive for you - emotions and thoughts dictated by the collective reaction. You can thank me later for this little insight into your underdeveloped prefrontal cortex, look it up, you'll understand where I'm coming from.
You do not know the OP. He is a known racist.
 
Yet u cant link up ONE racist post made by me!


Apparently not. At any rate, attacking the messenger is a fallacy.

Attacking the messenger is generally considered a fallacy. This fallacy, known as an ad hominem (against the person), involves discrediting an argument by attacking the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person presenting it rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself.

The key points to understand about this fallacy are:

  • Relevance: The personal attributes or circumstances of the messenger are irrelevant to the validity of the message or argument they present.
  • Distraction: It serves to distract from the actual issue or argument at hand.
  • Avoidance: It's often used when one lacks a counterargument or when one wants to avoid engaging with the argument directly.

However, it's worth noting:

  • In some contexts, the credibility of the source (messenger) can be relevant, but only if it directly relates to the content of the message. For instance, if someone claims expertise in a field where they have none, questioning their credentials might be pertinent but still does not necessarily invalidate the argument itself—it should only prompt further scrutiny of the claim.
  • The fallacy occurs when the attack on the messenger is used as the primary or sole basis for rejecting the argument rather than examining the argument on its merits.

In summary, while there are scenarios where the character or background of the messenger might warrant consideration, attacking the messenger to undermine an argument without addressing its content is indeed a fallacy.



@Grok
 
You do not know the OP. He is a known racist.

Unfortunately, your accusation means jack shit coming from a drone like you. Not long ago, calling someone a racist was a heavy charge, one you didn't throw around unless you were damn sure. A racist was the epitome of evil, so the label wasn't used lightly.

Back then, racism meant something to people like Martin Luther King Jr. - the belief that one race was inherently superior or inferior based on skin color. As a kid, I thought how utterly moronic it was to judge someone's worth by their skin tone. But now, the libtards have not only lost the plot but have become the very racists they claim to fight. Every time your hive opens its mouth about race, it's to patronize 'people of color' as if they're not even in the room. Pathetic. You teach your kids that those with different levels of melanin need easier standards, different opportunities, and separate cultures from us "white people" to make things "fair." The 'colored' people I know think you libtards are the real racists, sick of your condescending pity.

So, enlighten me, how is the OP a racist? I'm all ears because if he is, I'll condemn him to hell and back. But use Martin Luther King's definition of racism, so I know we're on the same page. I don't just throw that accusation around like confetti.

While we're at it, let me ask you: Are you a racist? Do you believe 'people of color' need lower standards to succeed? Are you hiding behind the "leveling the playing field" excuse to cover up your own racist sentiments? It's quite the white liberal trait. You've clearly struck a nerve here; I'm beyond sick of racist libtards accusing others of racism without any real basis. So, I beg you, make a logical, coherent case for the OP's racism. It's your duty since you're the one tossing that word around like it's just another meaningless label like 'capitalist' or 'Trump' or 'freedom' - all terms that mean the same to your radical left-wing, hive-minded, fucking drones.
 

Tobytone


You see these fucking idiots think if u post story's that show blacks doing bad makes one a racist

Blacks are 13% of the population and commit over 50% of all murders....its a 100 percent fact

But these idiots think if u post such facts makes you a racist
I asked the fucking drone to prove it........crickets
 
Unfortunately, your accusation means jack shit coming from a drone like you. Not long ago, calling someone a racist was a heavy charge, one you didn't throw around unless you were damn sure. A racist was the epitome of evil, so the label wasn't used lightly.

Back then, racism meant something to people like Martin Luther King Jr. - the belief that one race was inherently superior or inferior based on skin color. As a kid, I thought how utterly moronic it was to judge someone's worth by their skin tone. But now, the libtards have not only lost the plot but have become the very racists they claim to fight. Every time your hive opens its mouth about race, it's to patronize 'people of color' as if they're not even in the room. Pathetic. You teach your kids that those with different levels of melanin need easier standards, different opportunities, and separate cultures from us "white people" to make things "fair." The 'colored' people I know think you libtards are the real racists, sick of your condescending pity.

So, enlighten me, how is the OP a racist? I'm all ears because if he is, I'll condemn him to hell and back. But use Martin Luther King's definition of racism, so I know we're on the same page. I don't just throw that accusation around like confetti.

While we're at it, let me ask you: Are you a racist? Do you believe 'people of color' need lower standards to succeed? Are you hiding behind the "leveling the playing field" excuse to cover up your own racist sentiments? It's quite the white liberal trait. You've clearly struck a nerve here; I'm beyond sick of racist libtards accusing others of racism without any real basis. So, I beg you, make a logical, coherent case for the OP's racism. It's your duty since you're the one tossing that word around like it's just another meaningless label like 'capitalist' or 'Trump' or 'freedom' - all terms that mean the same to your radical left-wing, hive-minded, fucking drones.
Wow, that was a load of revisionist BS found on every "alternative-right" website or postings on "X", or blathering in StormFront, etc, etc.
The OP and it's author ONLY highlight crimes committed by non-white folk (foreign or immigrant). They do such to "validate" their racist and bigoted mindsets and political agenda.

But hey, all those mass shootings by local white guys is not so bad, and Jan. 6th was just a "few malcontents" that got blown out of proportion (if not viewed as true "patriots" taking back their country and such garbage) .... and as the following is to be ignored:

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Minneapolis_shooting


Crime is crime, and when proven beyond reasonable doubt, the perpetrators should be punished by the letter of the law regardless of race, creed or color.

So you can shove your hypocritical pointy hood where the sun don't shine.
 

Tobytone


You see these fucking idiots think if u post story's that show blacks doing bad makes one a racist

Blacks are 13% of the population and commit over 50% of all murders....its a 100 percent fact

But these idiots think if u post such facts makes you a racist
Calling Lesion Lameass to assist? :ROFLMAO: :rofl2: :ROFLMAO:

If Toby Tugboat was fair, he'd be criticizing your lack of education and writing skills....but it's clear he's just another fucking moron like you.

Correct about violence. Most of that violence is directed at other blacks which is why the #1 cause of death for American black males is homicide. Mostly caused by other black males. If you weren't such a racist fuckwit and overall moron, you'd be asking why that problem exists and how to solve it instead of constantly posting white nationalist posts spreading fear of American blacks.

Facts are facts, dumbass. It's how a person uses those facts that determine if they are a racist. It's like a gun. A gun is just a tool can that can used for good or bad. Self-defense or murder. Murder is evil and the way you use facts is evil. You are evil, volsrock1. You follow the path of Satan and relish in hate for other people....but I'm guessing you're an atheist and don't believe in God, the words of Jesus or even our Constitution.
 
Back
Top