Some are still in the dark on Obama

They say this election will be decided by the "independent" voter, most of whom refer to themselves as "moderate" or "libertarian" or some other arbitrary label they've applied to avoid implication as a conservative. It's kinda scary when you think the fate of our nation rests in the hands of these people. After all, how stupid do you have to be to not see what Obama is doing and where he is taking the country? How much of a gullible fool would it take to believe this radical liberal isn't going to use the fact that he doesn't have to get re-elected, to advance the Socialist-Marxist-Keynesian liberal agenda in his second term?

The mere fact that we HAVE "moderates" or "independents" ...people who are somehow "on the fence" over this, is astounding to me. How can any rational thinking person not get this? Okay, I could see, 4 years ago... all the hyped-up shit on Bush and the war(s)... trillions more in debt... yeah, I see how an "independent" might have been duped into giving this slick young Democrat a shot... but NOW? After we've seen the disastrous results of his administration's policies? After he has surpassed Bush's spending in less than half the time? After we sat here and watched him and Nancy cram a health care bill down our throats against our will? We've seen him appoint more non-elected and non-accountable CZARS to power, than any president ever, completely exploiting this executive privilege to an extent it was never intended, so as to put his socialist cronies in charge of virtually every aspect of our lives and businesses. He expanded the Patriot Act! Is THIS somehow what "independents" like and want in a president? The man has essentially been a tyrant dictator for three years, and that was WITH the threat of losing re-election, imagine what his regime will be like when he doesn't have ANY encumbrances?

But still.... We hear the mush-brain "indie" out there, acting as if this election is some sort of tough decision and choice we have to ponder... 'Oooo, are they going to talk about guns, gays, and god? Are they gonna support more tax breaks for oil companies? Are they gonna talk about abortion and contraception?' As if any of this matters, if Obama gets re-elected. I wouldn't be surprised if, by 2016, we don't even do elections anymore.... because the Obama Election Czar will have determined we are too stupid to vote in national elections, and it's better to let liberals decide who should be president... There will, of course, be people who scream this is unconstitutional, but Eric Holder and Obama will claim it IS Constitutional under Executive Privilege, and the SCOTUS will rule 5-4 with an opinion that reads like it was written by 'Toby' from The Office: Since it was determined by a czar, and the president does have the right to appoint czars, technically, the actions taken by the czar are constitutional... *poof* there goes our right to vote! What? Do you fucking NOT think it can happen? There are a LOT of things I thought couldn't ever happen a few years ago, but they DID!
 
We get it, Dixie...Obama..."dark"...

Remember this?


gopconventionracism.jpg
 
Dixie; Are you paranoid or just delusional?

Let's see,
1. we will lose the right to vote in less than four years
2. It would be better if there were no moderates.
3. Obama spent more than Bush in half the time
4. Obama is a radical liberal
5.Obama passed the healthcare bill so you want him replaced by the guy who wrote the bill because the bill is so bad?
6.Obama rules as a tyrant dictator
7.The SCOTUS is 5-4 tilted liberal
8.Did I miss any points?

Tentatively I would say your reality testing is poor. While it is not unusual for people in your field to have mental health issues, in your case
an objective outside observer may be very beneficial.
 
Dixie; Are you paranoid or just delusional?

Let's see,
1. we will lose the right to vote in less than four years [wouldn't be a shocker to me!]
2. It would be better if there were no moderates. [if they turned conservative, yes.]
3. Obama spent more than Bush in half the time [correct - cite GAO 2012]
4. Obama is a radical liberal [Correct!]
5.Obama passed the healthcare bill so you want him replaced by the guy who wrote the bill because the bill is so bad?
[Mitt Romney didn't write the 2000-page bill that no one read.]
6.Obama rules as a tyrant dictator [Correct!]
7.The SCOTUS is 5-4 tilted liberal [On any given day!]
8.Did I miss any points? [You scored 6 out of 7, which has to be some kind of record for you! Keep up the great work!]

Tentatively I would say your reality testing is poor. While it is not unusual for people in your field to have mental health issues, in your case
an objective outside observer may be very beneficial.

People in my field? What do you think "my field" is? I think what you dislike is my "hobby" of following politics and what is happening in politics. My reality testing is the reality virtually every American is experiencing, unless Obama is sending everyone who voted for him a check for a few thou a month! I haven't heard of it, but again, wouldn't be surprised. There is still something like $800 billion in stimulus money missing, so who knows?
 
People in my field? What do you think "my field" is? I think what you dislike is my "hobby" of following politics and what is happening in politics. My reality testing is the reality virtually every American is experiencing, unless Obama is sending everyone who voted for him a check for a few thou a month! I haven't heard of it, but again, wouldn't be surprised. There is still something like $800 billion in stimulus money missing, so who knows?

yurt
 
They say this election will be decided by the "independent" voter, most of whom refer to themselves as "moderate" or "libertarian" or some other arbitrary label they've applied to avoid implication as a conservative. It's kinda scary when you think the fate of our nation rests in the hands of these people. After all, how stupid do you have to be to not see what Obama is doing and where he is taking the country? How much of a gullible fool would it take to believe this radical liberal isn't going to use the fact that he doesn't have to get re-elected, to advance the Socialist-Marxist-Keynesian liberal agenda in his second term?

The mere fact that we HAVE "moderates" or "independents" ...people who are somehow "on the fence" over this, is astounding to me. How can any rational thinking person not get this? Okay, I could see, 4 years ago... all the hyped-up shit on Bush and the war(s)... trillions more in debt... yeah, I see how an "independent" might have been duped into giving this slick young Democrat a shot... but NOW? After we've seen the disastrous results of his administration's policies? After he has surpassed Bush's spending in less than half the time? After we sat here and watched him and Nancy cram a health care bill down our throats against our will? We've seen him appoint more non-elected and non-accountable CZARS to power, than any president ever, completely exploiting this executive privilege to an extent it was never intended, so as to put his socialist cronies in charge of virtually every aspect of our lives and businesses. He expanded the Patriot Act! Is THIS somehow what "independents" like and want in a president? The man has essentially been a tyrant dictator for three years, and that was WITH the threat of losing re-election, imagine what his regime will be like when he doesn't have ANY encumbrances?

But still.... We hear the mush-brain "indie" out there, acting as if this election is some sort of tough decision and choice we have to ponder... 'Oooo, are they going to talk about guns, gays, and god? Are they gonna support more tax breaks for oil companies? Are they gonna talk about abortion and contraception?' As if any of this matters, if Obama gets re-elected. I wouldn't be surprised if, by 2016, we don't even do elections anymore.... because the Obama Election Czar will have determined we are too stupid to vote in national elections, and it's better to let liberals decide who should be president... There will, of course, be people who scream this is unconstitutional, but Eric Holder and Obama will claim it IS Constitutional under Executive Privilege, and the SCOTUS will rule 5-4 with an opinion that reads like it was written by 'Toby' from The Office: Since it was determined by a czar, and the president does have the right to appoint czars, technically, the actions taken by the czar are constitutional... *poof* there goes our right to vote! What? Do you fucking NOT think it can happen? There are a LOT of things I thought couldn't ever happen a few years ago, but they DID!

Dixie, you keep harping on ObamaCare. Do you realize a decent medical plan has been discussed for generations? Generations, Dixie. Not a few years or a couple of administrations but for years and years and years and nothing materialized. So, the questions are, "Do you know that people have suffered because of a lack of a medical plan? If so, do you not care?"
 
Dixie didn't seem to mind when Dubya was spending 1.5 trillion over budget between the wars and tarp and whatnot. The difference is merely that Obama is honest about the abhorrent spending thats going on, and Bush was not. So that makes enough sense for ol' Dix. Its not about who does what or who will do what for idealogues like Dix, who base their opinion solely on the party affiliation of the guy running. Its about APPEARING conservative, and selling lies. Shit, Bush and his Republican congress were the biggest spenders of all time when in power, and I called Dix out on it every step of the way, and the only thing he could do was call me a "pinhead" (Ouch). Now he's surprised that the Democrats get in there and fuck it up even worse? And he's calling the independents stupid? Typical of "conservatives" who only care when fiscal policy is fucked up by the other party.

Truth is, there's not really a dimes worth of difference between them. A vote for one is a vote for the other.

See you in a year.
 
People in my field? What do you think "my field" is? I think what you dislike is my "hobby" of following politics and what is happening in politics. My reality testing is the reality virtually every American is experiencing, unless Obama is sending everyone who voted for him a check for a few thou a month! I haven't heard of it, but again, wouldn't be surprised. There is still something like $800 billion in stimulus money missing, so who knows?

Field? What field? dicklicker wouldn't last 10 minutes even in a simple assed cotton field.
 
Dixie didn't seem to mind when Dubya was spending 1.5 trillion over budget between the wars and tarp and whatnot. The difference is merely that Obama is honest about the abhorrent spending thats going on, and Bush was not. So that makes enough sense for ol' Dix. Its not about who does what or who will do what for idealogues like Dix, who base their opinion solely on the party affiliation of the guy running. Its about APPEARING conservative, and selling lies. Shit, Bush and his Republican congress were the biggest spenders of all time when in power, and I called Dix out on it every step of the way, and the only thing he could do was call me a "pinhead" (Ouch). Now he's surprised that the Democrats get in there and fuck it up even worse? And he's calling the independents stupid? Typical of "conservatives" who only care when fiscal policy is fucked up by the other party.

Truth is, there's not really a dimes worth of difference between them. A vote for one is a vote for the other.

See you in a year.

Oh but the record shows Dixie DID seem to mind, because Dixie authored numerous threads about Bush spending. And Obama has NEVER been honest about spending, when he was running for president, he called Bush "UNPATRIOTIC" for spending 5 tril in 8 years. What the fuck does that make Obama, who spent more in half the time, other than a hypocrite?

If you honestly believe the part about not being a dimes worth of difference, you're an idiot. A blind fool idiot.
 
Dixie, you keep harping on ObamaCare. Do you realize a decent medical plan has been discussed for generations? Generations, Dixie. Not a few years or a couple of administrations but for years and years and years and nothing materialized. So, the questions are, "Do you know that people have suffered because of a lack of a medical plan? If so, do you not care?"

It is pointless talking to him about it, he is totally deaf to any rational discourse on the subject.
 
Oh but the record shows Dixie DID seem to mind, because Dixie authored numerous threads about Bush spending. And Obama has NEVER been honest about spending, when he was running for president, he called Bush "UNPATRIOTIC" for spending 5 tril in 8 years. What the fuck does that make Obama, who spent more in half the time, other than a hypocrite?

If you honestly believe the part about not being a dimes worth of difference, you're an idiot. A blind fool idiot.

The fact that we have just been through the biggest post war financial crisis means nothing to you. Whoever was in power would have had to do the exact same things to stop a gigantic meltdown of the world economy.
 
Back
Top