Some are still in the dark on Obama

One month doesn't make a trend, Dixie.

But three and a half years DOES make a trend, and the trend for the past three and a half years, has been STAGNANT job growth. Here lately, every time the report comes out, missing its projection once again, liberals dance around in the streets and proclaim happy days are here again, because we didn't appear to lose any more jobs. You've completely forgotten about the rate of growth in the workforce, as if there is somehow the same exact number of people out there as three and a half years ago. IF that were the case, we've only gained a few million jobs over nearly four years, but that's not the case, as there have been millions and millions of new people entering the workforce during this time.
 
But three and a half years DOES make a trend, and the trend for the past three and a half years, has been STAGNANT job growth. Here lately, every time the report comes out, missing its projection once again, liberals dance around in the streets and proclaim happy days are here again, because we didn't appear to lose any more jobs. You've completely forgotten about the rate of growth in the workforce, as if there is somehow the same exact number of people out there as three and a half years ago. IF that were the case, we've only gained a few million jobs over nearly four years, but that's not the case, as there have been millions and millions of new people entering the workforce during this time.

Cite?
 
But three and a half years DOES make a trend, and the trend for the past three and a half years, has been STAGNANT job growth. Here lately, every time the report comes out, missing its projection once again, liberals dance around in the streets and proclaim happy days are here again, because we didn't appear to lose any more jobs. You've completely forgotten about the rate of growth in the workforce, as if there is somehow the same exact number of people out there as three and a half years ago. IF that were the case, we've only gained a few million jobs over nearly four years, but that's not the case, as there have been millions and millions of new people entering the workforce during this time.

No one is saying 'happy days are here again.' But the country has turned the corner; where jobs were being lost & the market was tanking, we are not gaining jobs, and the market is rising. These are pretty indisputable facts.

So, when posters like you & PMP go around saying that we're NOT gaining jobs, or that things have gotten worse, it's laughable. You won't see Mitt saying anything like that in the upcoming campaign, because he'd be ridiculed for it. It is not in touch w/ reality.
 
But three and a half years DOES make a trend, and the trend for the past three and a half years, has been STAGNANT job growth. Here lately, every time the report comes out, missing its projection once again, liberals dance around in the streets and proclaim happy days are here again, because we didn't appear to lose any more jobs. You've completely forgotten about the rate of growth in the workforce, as if there is somehow the same exact number of people out there as three and a half years ago. IF that were the case, we've only gained a few million jobs over nearly four years, but that's not the case, as there have been millions and millions of new people entering the workforce during this time.

The Dow Jones doesn't agree with you Dixie. Obama cannot force companies to hire people instead of buying robots.
 
Dixie has been driven down again, and it's not even nightime.
 
No one is saying 'happy days are here again.' But the country has turned the corner; where jobs were being lost & the market was tanking, we are not gaining jobs, and the market is rising. These are pretty indisputable facts.

So, when posters like you & PMP go around saying that we're NOT gaining jobs, or that things have gotten worse, it's laughable. You won't see Mitt saying anything like that in the upcoming campaign, because he'd be ridiculed for it. It is not in touch w/ reality.

Three hundred thousand.... I typed it out because I want you to ruminate on that number for a bit. Now, if you had 300k M&M's, you would say you had "a lot" of M&M's, correct? If you had 300k friends on facebook, it would be "a lot" of friends, wouldn't it? If you gained 300k friends in one month, that would be pretty phenomenal, wouldn't it? Three hundred thousand.... that's how many NEW people filed jobless claims last month! Now, generally speaking, in order to file a jobless claim, one has to be jobless. So we can take this information and presume that at least 300k more people this month, than last month, are without jobs. Were jobs created? Yes...BUT...new people also came into the workforce... people graduated college or turned 18, etc. When everything is accounted for, 300k more people filed jobless claims. We have NOT CREATED JOBS!

The Dow Jones doesn't agree with you Dixie. Obama cannot force companies to hire people instead of buying robots.

For the most part, the Dow Jones is rich people swapping money around! Those mean and greedy SOB's who make up the 1% you are always bitching about! THOSE people are doing rather well in this shitty economy, because they have the capital to buy up stocks at pennies on the dollar. Now this might present some sort of advantage for liberals if they hadn't already crucified these people and could possibly win their votes, but that isn't the case. But good luck going after the stock mogul vote, I'm sure you'll do very well with that demographic! Meanwhile, everyone else is suffering.

Of course Obama can't force companies to hire people instead of robots, but neither could McCain have prevented that, or Bush, or Romney, or anyone else, that is called PROGRESS. We're going to always advance in technology and productivity, it's been going on for quite some time. Believe it or not, they once built automobiles without the help of robots! The thing is, in spite of this universal factor which plagues every president, Mr. Obama campaigned and won on the promise he could do something, and he has failed.
 
Three hundred thousand.... I typed it out because I want you to ruminate on that number for a bit. Now, if you had 300k M&M's, you would say you had "a lot" of M&M's, correct? If you had 300k friends on facebook, it would be "a lot" of friends, wouldn't it? If you gained 300k friends in one month, that would be pretty phenomenal, wouldn't it? Three hundred thousand.... that's how many NEW people filed jobless claims last month! Now, generally speaking, in order to file a jobless claim, one has to be jobless. So we can take this information and presume that at least 300k more people this month, than last month, are without jobs. Were jobs created? Yes...BUT...new people also came into the workforce... people graduated college or turned 18, etc. When everything is accounted for, 300k more people filed jobless claims. We have NOT CREATED JOBS!



For the most part, the Dow Jones is rich people swapping money around! Those mean and greedy SOB's who make up the 1% you are always bitching about! THOSE people are doing rather well in this shitty economy, because they have the capital to buy up stocks at pennies on the dollar. Now this might present some sort of advantage for liberals if they hadn't already crucified these people and could possibly win their votes, but that isn't the case. But good luck going after the stock mogul vote, I'm sure you'll do very well with that demographic! Meanwhile, everyone else is suffering.

Of course Obama can't force companies to hire people instead of robots, but neither could McCain have prevented that, or Bush, or Romney, or anyone else, that is called PROGRESS. We're going to always advance in technology and productivity, it's been going on for quite some time. Believe it or not, they once built automobiles without the help of robots! The thing is, in spite of this universal factor which plagues every president, Mr. Obama campaigned and won on the promise he could do something, and he has failed.

More unsubstantiated bloviating from defeated Dixie.
 
Jeez, I really thought the examples I gave were good enough, but I guess not... let me try again...

If "Jobless Claims" had a Facebook page, they would have gained 300,000 new friends last month!
 
No one is saying 'happy days are here again.' But the country has turned the corner; where jobs were being lost & the market was tanking, we are not gaining jobs, and the market is rising. These are pretty indisputable facts.

So, when posters like you & PMP go around saying that we're NOT gaining jobs, or that things have gotten worse, it's laughable. You won't see Mitt saying anything like that in the upcoming campaign, because he'd be ridiculed for it. It is not in touch w/ reality.

:palm:
 
Jeez, I really thought the examples I gave were good enough, but I guess not... let me try again...If "Jobless Claims" had a Facebook page, they would have gained 300,000 new friends last month!

If you know about FaceBook, then you know how to research your claims online and use the results to support your position, don't you?
 
Jeez, I really thought the examples I gave were good enough, but I guess not... let me try again...

If "Jobless Claims" had a Facebook page, they would have gained 300,000 new friends last month!

If the Superbowl could only be attended by new people who filed jobless claims last month, they would need at least 3 stadiums.
 
I'm curious, Yurts - in your estimation - have we not gained jobs, and are things worse than they were?

I'm not sure about Yurts, btw - would you rather be addressed as "master of the facepalm"?
 
If the Superbowl could only be attended by new people who filed jobless claims last month, they would need at least 3 stadiums.

And if every person who got a job added since Obama was sworn in was seated, how many stadiums would that take. Mr. Non-sequitur?
 
Back
Top