Someone needs to explain this

ADreamOfLiberty said:
What can you say, Stalin was a very popular man. You can deny his election if you want to get shot, leave me out of it.
Click to expand...
In Russia nobody wanted to vote when the Communists were in power so they made election day a holiday. The polls were set up where you went in one room and voted the Communists in, then went into a second where you got a bottle of vodka. The day after the election soon became a holiday too...

 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
In 2008 the kenyan got 69.5 million votes

In 2012 the kenyan got 66 million votes

In 2016 Hillary got 66 million votes

In 2020 Veggie Joe got 81.3 million votes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In 2024 Kamala got 71 million votes

en.wikipedia.org

United States presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

How did biden do that.?? He couldn't draw flies at his rallies. No one liked him or cared about him. IT WAS MASSIVE CHEATING.
Click to expand...
Why would Democrats go to rallies in the middle of a pandemic? The non-Trump supporters knew who they were voting for.
 
Last edited:
BartenderElite said:
That there is no evidence? Yeah - I guess that's "suspicious."

You lost this one. If there is evidence, you could still win - but there isn't. You can't post a single thing. And yet you continue to undermine election integrity, one of the foundations of our democracy, baselessly.
Click to expand...
Admit that a real democracy is duty bound to run elections that reasonable people know are real election because there is no reasonable doubt that the quantity of fraud is below the margin of victory.

Admit the fundamental theorem of statistics: The ratios of the sample are representative of the ratios of the whole population. In other words admit that just because you can only prove 10 ballots are fraudulent does not mean that only 10 ballots are fraudulent. Instead admit that it means there is a mechanism for fraudulent ballots to be added to the pile and statistical analysis is required to get anything resembling a ballpark on the actual amount of fraud.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
In 2008 the kenyan got 69.5 million votes

In 2012 the kenyan got 66 million votes

In 2016 Hillary got 66 million votes

In 2020 Veggie Joe got 81.3 million votes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In 2024 Kamala got 71 million votes
Click to expand...
It would appear some of the democratic votes didn't get counted somehow.

I wonder how that happened?
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Admit that a real democracy is duty bound to run elections that reasonable people know are real election because there is no reasonable doubt that the quantity of fraud is below the margin of victory.

Admit the fundamental theorem of statistics: The ratios of the sample are representative of the ratios of the whole population. In other words admit that just because you can only prove 10 ballots are fraudulent does not mean that only 10 ballots are fraudulent. Instead admit that it means there is a mechanism for fraudulent ballots to be added to the pile and statistical analysis is required to get anything resembling a ballpark on the actual amount of fraud.
Click to expand...

Wow dude. You have ZERO EVIDENCE. After claiming that evidence has been posted.

Admit that you believed a pathological liar who hates losing when he said an election was rigged. And he said the same in '16, and '24 (until he won).
 
BartenderElite said:
Wow dude. You have ZERO EVIDENCE. After claiming that evidence has been posted.

Admit that you believed a pathological liar who hates losing when he said an election was rigged. And he said the same in '16, and '24 (until he won).
Click to expand...
Still you refuse. Very suspicious.


BartenderElite said:
Nope. He won - so there was no fraud.

Until the next time Republicans lose. Guaranteed.
Click to expand...
So you proved us hypocrites and you only had to tell us what we think despite our protests to do it. Aren't you a genius?
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Well I've played this game before and it looks an awful lot like this:

- THERE IS NO EVIDENCE
+ Post evidence of undeniable fraud
- THAT'S NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE, STATISTICS DON'T EXIST EVERY BALLOT THAT HASN'T BEEN PROVEN FRAUDULENT IS BY DEFAULT VALID
+ Post more evidence
- THAT'S CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
+ Points out that the modifications to election procedure were such that only circumstantial evidence would be possible
- SO IT'S CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, DOESN'T COUNT
+ Points out that it is the duty of a democratic government to make elections auditable, i.e. proven, i.e. fraud would leave more than circumstantial evidence
- NO IT ISN'T, A DEMOCRACY IS ANY GOVERNMENT THAT COLLECTS BALLOTS; DOESN'T MATTER IF THEY FOLLOW A SYSTEM THAT PREVENTS ONE PERSON FROM FILLING OUT MULTIPLE BALLOTS

So does [-] that just about sum up your feelings or are you sane and honest?


...and that means anything they rejected must be meritless?
Click to expand...

The bolded.

If there is 'undeniable fraud,' and evidence of that - why don't you post it?
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
I'm waiting for you to admit those obvious facts that an honest person wouldn't have any problem admitting so that you don't get to escape without an ounce of effort after making me compose a huge wall of text.
Click to expand...

What am I supposed to admit?

I need evidence, as anyone should. I don't engage in speculation & hypotheticals.

Do you think you're winning this right now?
 
BartenderElite said:
What am I supposed to admit?
Click to expand...
Admit that a real democracy is duty bound to run elections that reasonable people know are real election because there is no reasonable doubt that the quantity of fraud is below the margin of victory.

Admit the fundamental theorem of statistics: The ratios of the sample are representative of the ratios of the whole population. In other words admit that just because you can only prove 10 ballots are fraudulent does not mean that only 10 ballots are fraudulent. Instead admit that it means there is a mechanism for fraudulent ballots to be added to the pile and statistical analysis is required to get anything resembling a ballpark on the actual amount of fraud.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Well I've played this game before and it looks an awful lot like this:

- THERE IS NO EVIDENCE
+ Post evidence of undeniable fraud
Click to expand...
OK. The PA state constitution bans no-excuse absentee ballots and yet the dem gov sent out over a million of them in 2020.

www.legis.state.pa.us

The Constitution of Pennsylvania

www.legis.state.pa.us

§ 14. Absentee voting.
(a) The Legislature shall, by general law, provide a manner
in which, and the time and place at which, qualified electors
who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the
municipality of their residence, because their duties,
occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on
the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their
proper polling places because of illness or physical disability
or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance
of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election
day duties, in the case of a county employee, may vote, and for
the return and canvass of their votes in the election district
in which they respectively reside.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top