yes. Look at shit on youtube. It is magical bald eagles, bear moose, walleye and Osprey. You will need muscle for the portages and all day paddling. Ely, MN is the jumping off town.
Southerners Die Young
- Thread starter katzgar
- Start date
yes. Look at shit on youtube. It is magical bald eagles, bear moose, walleye and Osprey. You will need muscle for the portages and all day paddling. Ely, MN is the jumping off town.
Thanks.
Hopefully your kayak will get a hole in it and you won't be able to swim back to shore.
Cry some for me, bitch. I command you.
A day without CFM is like a day without Ebola. 
Today, 10:58 AM
CFM
Verified User
This message is hidden because CFM is on your ignore list.
Today, 10:58 AM
CFM
Verified User
This message is hidden because CFM is on your ignore list.
You and CFM will reap what you sow? I don't envy either of you.
You’re confused.
I didn’t start the bullshit about “Iglooland”. I’m merely pointing out the laughable ignorance of those who believe that. The climate is milder here than where the people who promote that bullshit live.
Don’t post out of ignorance and you won’t get called on it. Collectively speaking.
I'm not sowing anything but facts. Why would you not envy that?
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
The fucking cracker CFM should be sewing up the holes in his coveralls.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
You couldn't even manage a paper route, banjofuck. Not a problem since nobody in your "community" can read.
That's funny coming from someone from a community where the average IQ is 85, 75% of you are bastards, and damn near 1/3 rely on food stamps to be able to eat.
What community would that be, boy? Since you make claims like that, it would mean you'd have to know where it is. Why don't you get in the fucking car you claim to own, drive hear, and show me the boxing skills you say you have. Since I haven't seen you yet, it means you're not coming and for good reason.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Not that it matters, banjofuck, but I'm white, I was the New England AAU Welterweight Champion, Novice Class, and the New England AAU Middleweight Champion, Open Class. While in college, I was undefeated as a professional light heavyweight until I graduated and got shipped off to Vietnam. In previous posts, I may have understated my achievements because now, if you have any research skills whatsoever, which you probably don't, you can find out exactly who I am.
For the most part, I only drive to the supermarket. (Come summer, I will drive my recently acquired Corvette a bit.) If I'm going somewhere else, I usually call an Uber or hail a cab. I don't think that I'll be driving through "Deliverance" country just to beat your sorry ass, even though I'm 73.
Last edited:
That is impressive! Add "beat Complete Fucking Moron to a bloody pulp with no hands" to your list.
Gerry Cooney? lol
If you had any guts, you'd say who you are. Someone as tough as you pretend to be wouldn't be afraid to do so. If you could do what you said you could do, you would have already come to a location you indicate you know. Where are you?
Still waiting on proof of both the Corvette and the boxing claim. Do you have any you're man enough to provide?
Last edited:
When the claim of an average 85 IQ is made, it's a fact. When the claim about a 75% bastard birth rate is made, it's a fact. When the claim that 1 in every 3 1/2 uses food stamps is made, it's a fact.
Facts can't promote hate and if someone has a conflict with facts, that's their problem.
Uh, ….he's apparently a pretty skilled white boxer, and so was Gerry Cooney. Do you see black people behind every tree? In your dreams?
I totally proved my claims. You, like all Trump pukes ignore evidence and fact. I don't have to reveal my true identity to you to reveal a true fact about me, and I did.
Every fitness milestone I stated was documented in a single photo with the gear, tech shirts, memorabilia to back them up. What about some guy you'll
never know running some marathons or triathlons hurts you so deeply? If you said take a Superseal triathlon tee-shirt and medal and put it next to a purple
tulip and todays paper, I could have done it. You didn't. You don't care. You are here to troll race and lie your ass off fat lazy old fool.
You voted for a criminal loser and we all foresaw this. That means you aren't worth the tartar the dentist scrapes off my molars, piece of shit Repuke racist.
Last edited:
In the United States both scholars and the general public have been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate divisions within the human species based on visible physical differences. With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century, however, it has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic "racial" groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups than between them. In neighboring populations there is much overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions. Throughout history whenever different groups have come into contact, they have interbred. The continued sharing of genetic materials has maintained all of humankind as a single species.
Physical variations in any given trait tend to occur gradually rather than abruptly over geographic areas. And because physical traits are inherited independently of one another, knowing the range of one trait does not predict the presence of others. For example, skin color varies largely from light in the temperate areas in the north to dark in the tropical areas in the south; its intensity is not related to nose shape or hair texture. Dark skin may be associated with frizzy or kinky hair or curly or wavy or straight hair, all of which are found among different indigenous peoples in tropical regions. These facts render any attempt to establish lines of division among biological populations both arbitrary and subjective.
Historical research has shown that the idea of "race" has always carried more meanings than mere physical differences; indeed, physical variations in the human species have no meaning except the social ones that humans put on them. Today scholars in many fields argue that "race" as it is understood in the United States of America was a social mechanism invented during the 18th century to refer to those populations brought together in colonial America: the English and other European settlers, the conquered Indian peoples, and those peoples of Africa brought in to provide slave labor.
From its inception, this modern concept of "race" was modeled after an ancient theorem of the Great Chain of Being, which posited natural categories on a hierarchy established by God or nature. Thus "race" was a mode of classification linked specifically to peoples in the colonial situation. It subsumed a growing ideology of inequality devised to rationalize European attitudes and treatment of the conquered and enslaved peoples. Proponents of slavery in particular during the 19th century used "race" to justify the retention of slavery. The ideology magnified the differences among Europeans, Africans, and Indians, established a rigid hierarchy of socially exclusive categories underscored and bolstered unequal rank and status differences, and provided the rationalization that the inequality was natural or God-given. The different physical traits of African-Americans and Indians became markers or symbols of their status differences.
As they were constructing US society, leaders among European-Americans fabricated the cultural/behavioral characteristics associated with each "race," linking superior traits with Europeans and negative and inferior ones to blacks and Indians. Numerous arbitrary and fictitious beliefs about the different peoples were institutionalized and deeply embedded in American thought.
Early in the 19th century the growing fields of science began to reflect the public consciousness about human differences. Differences among the "racial" categories were projected to their greatest extreme when the argument was posed that Africans, Indians, and Europeans were separate species, with Africans the least human and closer taxonomically to apes.
Ultimately "race" as an ideology about human differences was subsequently spread to other areas of the world. It became a strategy for dividing, ranking, and controlling colonized people used by colonial powers everywhere. But it was not limited to the colonial situation. In the latter part of the 19th century it was employed by Europeans to rank one another and to justify social, economic, and political inequalities among their peoples. During World War II, the Nazis under Adolf Hitler enjoined the expanded ideology of "race" and "racial" differences and took them to a logical end: the extermination of 11 million people of "inferior races" (e.g., Jews, Gypsies, Africans, homosexuals, and so forth) and other unspeakable brutalities of the Holocaust.
"Race" thus evolved as a worldview, a body of prejudgments that distorts our ideas about human differences and group behavior. Racial beliefs constitute myths about the diversity in the human species and about the abilities and behavior of people homogenized into "racial" categories. The myths fused behavior and physical features together in the public mind, impeding our comprehension of both biological variations and cultural behavior, implying that both are genetically determined. Racial myths bear no relationship to the reality of human capabilities or behavior. Scientists today find that reliance on such folk beliefs about human differences in research has led to countless errors.
At the end of the 20th century, we now understand that human cultural behavior is learned, conditioned into infants beginning at birth, and always subject to modification. No human is born with a built-in culture or language. Our temperaments, dispositions, and personalities, regardless of genetic propensities, are developed within sets of meanings and values that we call "culture." Studies of infant and early childhood learning and behavior attest to the reality of our cultures in forming who we are.
It is a basic tenet of anthropological knowledge that all normal human beings have the capacity to learn any cultural behavior. The American experience with immigrants from hundreds of different language and cultural backgrounds who have acquired some version of American culture traits and behavior is the clearest evidence of this fact. Moreover, people of all physical variations have learned different cultural behaviors and continue to do so as modern transportation moves millions of immigrants around the world.
How people have been accepted and treated within the context of a given society or culture has a direct impact on how they perform in that society. The "racial" worldview was invented to assign some groups to perpetual low status, while others were permitted access to privilege, power, and wealth. The tragedy in the United States has been that the policies and practices stemming from this worldview succeeded all too well in constructing unequal populations among Europeans, Native Americans, and peoples of African descent. Given what we know about the capacity of normal humans to achieve and function within any culture, we conclude that present-day inequalities between so-called "racial" groups are not consequences of their biological inheritance but products of historical and contemporary social, economic, educational, and political circumstances.
[Note: For further information on human biological variations, see the statement prepared and issued by the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 1996 (AJPA 101:569-570).]
https://www.americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2583