Stewart stomps pro-gun rhetoric.

archives said:
“Order” is the freedom to go to a movie, church, spa, concert, bowling alley, Walmart, grocery store, school, Mall, birthday party, etc., without having to concern yourself with getting shot
Click to expand...

so when you ban one type of gun, and people still get shot, you will fuck off, or no?
 
zymurgy said:
so when you ban one type of gun, and people still get shot, you will fuck off, or no?
Click to expand...

The gun-banners seek to ban all guns. Banning "assault weapons", a fabricated term, is just a stepping stone.

I've asked several anti-gun LWers if Obama's 2013 Gun Ban had passed, would they be satisfied that it was enough. All avoided the question because the answer is obvious; it's a first step to a total gun ban.

The logic goes like this: If limiting magazines to 10-rounds, wouldn't limiting them to 5-rounds be better? If banning some semi-automatic rifles is good, isn't banning all of them better? They'll keep pushing until all that is left are single-shot muskets and then they'll try to ban those. Only for the poor and middle class, of course, since the rich will always be able to pay for it like abortion.

Gun banners on JPP have already supported a total ban on all guns or all semi-automatic guns.

I don't trust liars and this is the #1 reason why I don't trust Democrats nor will I ever vote for one.
 
A couple of cheer leaders tried to get in a car and oops, it was the wrong one. The owner of the car walked up to the car and started shooting. He was a responsible gun owner until that second.
 
archives said:
And how does requiring registration ban anyone from exercising their 2nd Amendment rights? As he noted, people have to register to vote, and that doesn’t ban them from exercising their right to vote
Click to expand...

You seem to think showing an ID bans people from voting. You need to get your head right before you address these issues.
 
Nordberg said:
A couple of cheer leaders tried to get in a car and oops, it was the wrong one. The owner of the car walked up to the car and started shooting. He was a responsible gun owner until that second.
Click to expand...

Just like someone who walks into a store and then shoplifts. They were honest until they were not.

Have you ever driven a car with a drink or two in you? Worse? Regardless if you were caught or not, you were a criminal who negligently put the lives of other people at risk for your own convenience.
 
Nordberg said:
A couple of cheer leaders tried to get in a car and oops, it was the wrong one. The owner of the car walked up to the car and started shooting. He was a responsible gun owner until that second.
Click to expand...

And it doesn't change the fact that the VAST MAJORITY of gun owners in America are responsible and you will punish them instead of the actual irresponsible gun possessors.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Comedian/Actor/Advocate & Activist Jon Stewart does a BEAUTIFUL job of systematically deconstructing and debunking the standard mantras and rhetoric used by "2nd Amendment" purists to defend resisting any gun control regulations.

Sen. Nathan Dahm (R-OK) uses EVERY talking point and "logic" that we've seen for YEARS on this site by "pro-gun, 2nd Amendment advocates. Stewart does in less than 10 minutes what I and others have been doing for years here...using facts and logic to directly challenge the rhetoric. Pity NONE of our political representatives do EXACTLY like this in Congress. Enjoy.


Click to expand...
Stewart, take down, 2points!
 
zymurgy said:
derp derp



a comedian releases 9 minutes of a 60 minute conversation and his retarded base thinks they won something :laugh:
Click to expand...

As the reader can see, Zymurgy is in full MAGA troll mode. Bleating nonsensical terms while repeating his OPINION, which is nothing more than expressing a personal dislike for Stewart....but NEVER addressing content or Dahm's inability to logically refute what Stewart says. He does this while just posting excerpts of my previous response ... as if the reader can't click on the arrow by our names and see his folly for themselves.

Carry on.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
THAT IS THE AMENDMENT, YOU COWARDLY OATH KEEPER! No interpretation....it is what it is in it's entirety. https://constitution.congress.gov/br...ALDE_00013264/

And that's what burns you gun monkey ass....you have to dance and contort to fantastic links to try and isolate and revise the first 4 words in order to attach your preferred version of reality.

And stop that childish bullshit about your freedom being taken away.... even when the 1994 AWB was active, law abiding citizens had access to a slew of handguns, shotguns, semi-auto handguns and rifles, hunting rifles, etc. In fact, you gun monkeys always bragged about your personal "expertise" in stating how weapons THAT WERE NEVER BANNED were superior to the AR-15. So why bitch about the ban? Beyond convoluted "logic" you can't give a rational reason.

But guess what? You got your way when the GOP voted not to reinstate the AWB...and the AR-15 became the weapon of choice for a LOT of mass shootings since. Why? Because it does EXACTLY what it was/is advertised to do....make better, more deadly shots of rank amateurs.

Congrats, dummy.

The OP stands...and you're just a piss poor parrot of Dahm, also failing.
Click to expand...

your OP is shit. EVERY piece of historical documentation from the founders clearly states that the government has no power or authority over the arms of the people.

you lose.
Click to expand...

1. Your worthless opinion that does not address the content of the OP.

2. Not quite, as my link clearly demonstrates. All you are doing is EXACTLY what I predicted.

3. So the clown you see in the mirror tells you. Carry on, you cowardly Oath Keeper cretin.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
They use the old tried-and-true "slippery slope" argument against any and all gun regulations. "If we let them ban ARs, next they'll ban .357s and shotguns and .22s."
Click to expand...

And yet that did NOT happen from 1994 to 2004. No such additional proposals were put forth. It's a tired old LaPierre mantra that is as bogus as he is. But our resident gun monkeys are like Dahm....they just repeat & regurgitate their talking points in place of logical and factual debate....mounting body counts non-withstanding....as Stewart's final retort points out.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
They use the old tried-and-true "slippery slope" argument against any and all gun regulations. "If we let them ban ARs, next they'll ban .357s and shotguns and .22s."
Click to expand...

are you saying that the 'slippery slope' argument is just a fallacy?
Click to expand...

You have concrete, in no uncertain terms proof of such happening in America in the last 25 to 60 years? Do tell!
 
zymurgy said:
the only people that think that are illogical progressives.
Click to expand...

So far, you haven't discussed any of the major topics from the OP. Perhaps you can explain to the reading audience what progressive official proposal's regarding gun control are "illogical". We'll wait.
 
zymurgy said:
no sane person thinks banning assault weapons will stop evil people from doing harm with guns

and no sane person thinks you will stop trying to ban the next most used gun by evil people

you are a really shitty liar.
Click to expand...

Sane people look at the FACTS.....the very assault weapon (s) that were on the 1994 AWB list have been used in numerous mass shootings since the 2004 sunset. FACTS that you gun monkeys can't blow smoke over.
 
zymurgy said:
you are a really shitty liar. you call people names constantly insinuating anyone on the other side is a nazi. you are as disgusting as they come here

but the truth is you know what I said is correct. you will ban "assault weapons" and will not stop there
Click to expand...

The chronology of the posts here clearly shows YOU to throw the first insult, calling people "dumb".

The OP does not do such.

When will you learn that you can't lie in a printed medium, my trollish friend?

And you can repeat that tired "prediction" that LaPierre and all gun monkey's have for decades...it's a lie, as none of you can point to a single legislative proposal that would open the door to such.

Carry on.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Just like someone who walks into a store and then shoplifts. They were honest until they were not.

Have you ever driven a car with a drink or two in you? Worse? Regardless if you were caught or not, you were a criminal who negligently put the lives of other people at risk for your own convenience.
Click to expand...

Nobody is defending drunk driving as a right. Nor is theft one. But many believe guns are a right. The litany about responsible gun owners is endless as it echoes through the country. It is wrong. Guns are designed to cause pain and death to other humans.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so laws against abortion were not a slippery slope to abortion being banned, got it.
Click to expand...

You only "get" the dodgy smoke you blow here, as the cowardly Oather clown you see in the mirror tells you.

Listen up, genius....the anti-abortion laws effectively make it impossible for women in many states to get an abortion WITHOUT ANY DEFINITIVE DECLARATION TO OUTRIGHT BANNING. As the old saying goes, there's more than one way to skin a cat.

There has NEVER been a gun regulation law or proposal which would give a state the right/mandate to ban all gun sales to the civilian population. If know different, please provide the source. If not, blow it out your gun monkey/Oather-Threeper ass with this tired mantra/talking point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top