Stewart stomps pro-gun rhetoric.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
1. That's nice....doesn't change the FACT that Dahm's gun monkey rhetoric was flatly deconstructed by Stewart for all (rational, logical, honest) to see. But if we all time travel back over 100 years, your little quip will REALLY be a hit!

2. The rest of your paranoia laden gun monkey rhetoric is just the usual MAGA playbook....when you can't refute something you just blather baseless supposition and conjecture coupled with personal attacks. Sad.

My previous response stands valid. Again, for someone not interested in the OP or what I say, you sure waste a LOT of time and space. Get some therapy.




What country are you in? You get on at 6PM and post until 2AM? Wait, 6PM California time is 9:00 AM in Beijing China.. Hmmmm.

I told you before, i'm not here to debate the deceptively edited propaganda video.

If Stewart wants to create an account, I'll debate him, otherwise you have to make your own arguments.

YOU failed to refute the fact that firearms empower the masses and that the opposition the democrat Reich has to them is that they embolden the peasant caste to view themselves equal to the ruling elite. The goal of the fascist democrat party is absolute power, but an armed populace cannot be ruled absolutely - hence your obsession with disarming the masses.

So let's get this straight:

You first sentence is merely some childish retort born of frustration of my humiliating you and your inability to refute the content of the OP.

You repeat the insanity of declaring you are not interested in the OP clip...something who's content you've NEVER addressed in any specificity (if you listened to it at all). And yet you've spent days of effort in an attempt to discredit Stewart and counter my subsequent posts on the subject. The topper is that you demand Stewart to personally debate you or post on this site. :wha: Then you repeat patented MAGA/gun monkey dodge...creating your own narrative and demanding a response to THAT as if it's the true point of discussion.

Pity for you the chronology of the posts will always be your undoing....your denial and repetitive clap trap non-withstanding. You gun monkey's and MAGA mooks never did have the intellectual honesty/courage to face something that proves your beliefs wrong. So now you'll just parrot your BS ad nauseum. Go right ahead, as I or others don't have to indulge your silliness further.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Well my little gun monkey, since I (nor Stewart in the OP video) have NEVER advocated "to end civil rights", your request is pure paranoid fantasy...one that gun monkey's use to interpret ANY logical or factual proposal/argument for gun control....ESPECIALLY when they have no logical or rational retort/refutation.

Your self aggrandizing bluff and bluster is pointless in lieu of the chronology of the posts. But insipid stubbornness is a MAGA mook/gun monkey trait. Carry on.



AND STILL no argument is presented...

You're not capable.

Fascinating....you make an allegation that has no basis in reality (much less a post you can point to that has me stating EXACTLY what you accuse me of). But rather than being a adult and conceding a point, you just double down on blathering nonsense that only the fool you see in the mirror (and/or the mental midget Zymurgy) agrees with.

The chronology of the posts will always be your undoing. You're done, :orang:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Oh, I see....it's a number's game! So tell us all, my little gun monkey....how many kids have to die in mass shootings with formerly banned weapons before your ilk acknowledges the need to bring back an AWB law? Number of adults? Both? Come, come now. A facetious comparison of ILLEGAL drug purchases to LEGALLY purchased guns with regards to civilian deaths....your trolling skills are deplorable.

Get it together, son. You've bitten off more than you can chew and subsequently look foolish.



You tell me, how many children must die before the democrat vassals close our border and demand that your country stop supplying the precursor materials to Mexico?

Yeah, not as long and the cartels continue to bribe Quid Pro and the Biden Crime Family.

Sorry, my dim witted gun monkey, but you can't change the subject. The chronology of the posts clearly shows YOU asserting a casualty comparison....an illogical one as you are comparing deaths via ILLEGAL drug use (DEA jurisdiction) to deaths by LEGALLY obtained (courtesy of the GOP) weapons (ATF jurisdiction) that were formerly banned. You did this because YOU CANNOT REFUTE THE CONTENT OF THE OP, nor can you counter any of my subsequent posts. So in typical intellectually impotent/dishonest MAGA/gun monkey manner, you attempt to change the topic and then stupidly claim some sort of "victory" if no one falls to your ploy.

As usual, you fail. So after a few days, it's clear that your trollish attempts are just a piss in the wind. So stamp your widdle feet in frustration and repeat your drivel ad nausea. You're done and I'm done with you. Adios, :orang:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
PLEASE STOP TRYING TO BE CLEVER....it just makes you look even more stupid than you are.


blablabla.

you failed to understand the enumerated powers. I am not trying to be clever anymore than you are trying to be retarded. it just is what it is

Just check Post #176, dear readers. Zymurgy is just another trollish :orang: babbling inanely because he can't logically or factually fault the OP or my subsequent posts. I leave him to the predictable last word and circle jerks with his buddies.
 
So let's get this straight:

You first sentence is merely some childish retort born of frustration of my humiliating you and your inability to refute the content of the OP.

You repeat the insanity of declaring you are not interested in the OP clip...something who's content you've NEVER addressed in any specificity (if you listened to it at all). And yet you've spent days of effort in an attempt to discredit Stewart and counter my subsequent posts on the subject. The topper is that you demand Stewart to personally debate you or post on this site. :wha: Then you repeat patented MAGA/gun monkey dodge...creating your own narrative and demanding a response to THAT as if it's the true point of discussion.

Pity for you the chronology of the posts will always be your undoing....your denial and repetitive clap trap non-withstanding. You gun monkey's and MAGA mooks never did have the intellectual honesty/courage to face something that proves your beliefs wrong. So now you'll just parrot your BS ad nauseum. Go right ahead, as I or others don't have to indulge your silliness further.

So let's get this straight - outside of mindless ad hom, you have absolutely nothing to say.

You make no attempt to address or refute the fact that firearms empower the masses and that the opposition the democrat Reich has to them is that they embolden the peasant caste to view themselves equal to the ruling elite.

I get it, you have no ability to offer a reasoned response.
 
Fascinating....you make an allegation that has no basis in reality

Then the allegation should be a simple matter for you to refute.

Yet you've been utterly unable to, and in fact have retreated to mindless ad hom.

(much less a post you can point to that has me stating EXACTLY what you accuse me of). But rather than being a adult and conceding a point, you just double down on blathering nonsense that only the fool you see in the mirror (and/or the mental midget Zymurgy) agrees with.

The chronology of the posts will always be your undoing. You're done, :orang:

More blather with zero content.

You are simple not able to defend the positions your party assigns to you.
 
Sorry, my dim witted gun monkey, but you can't change the subject. The chronology of the posts clearly shows YOU asserting a casualty comparison....an illogical one as you are comparing deaths via ILLEGAL drug use (DEA jurisdiction) to deaths by LEGALLY obtained (courtesy of the GOP) weapons (ATF jurisdiction) that were formerly banned. You did this because YOU CANNOT REFUTE THE CONTENT OF THE OP, nor can you counter any of my subsequent posts. So in typical intellectually impotent/dishonest MAGA/gun monkey manner, you attempt to change the topic and then stupidly claim some sort of "victory" if no one falls to your ploy.

As usual, you fail. So after a few days, it's clear that your trollish attempts are just a piss in the wind. So stamp your widdle feet in frustration and repeat your drivel ad nausea. You're done and I'm done with you. Adios, :orang:

How did I change the subject, lefty drone?

YOU started bleating the talking points from your Reich about how many children are killed with "assault weapons." YOU created the pretense that you fascists "care about children." Yet the fact is that deaths from so-called "Assault Weapons" is miniscule. Pointing out that deaths of children by an AR15 over the last 25 years are lower than even one year of the fentanyl that your Reich refuses to address, belies the claim. You don't care about children, you care about power.

As always, you offer no logic, no facts, just mindless bleating of Reich hating points. I understand, you don't think - the hive mind programs you to vomit out the idiocy you post.

However, I deal in facts - unlike you;

{Given that the FBI statistics pertain to all rifles, the homicide frequency of “assault-style” rifles like the AR-15 is necessarily lesser still, as such firearms compose a fraction of all the rifles used in crime.With an average of 13,657 homicides per year during the 2007-2017 timeframe, about one-tenth of one percent of homicides were produced by mass shootings involving AR-15s.

According to a New York Times analysis, since 2007, at least “173 people have been killed in mass shootings in the United States involving AR-15s.”
That’s 173 over a span of a decade, with an average of 17 homicides per year. To put this in perspective, consider that at this rate it would take almost one-hundred years of mass shootings with AR-15s to produce the same number of homicide victims that knives and sharp objects produce in one year.

With an average of 13,657 homicides per year during the 2007-2017 timeframe, about one-tenth of one percent of homicides were produced by mass shootings involving AR-15s.}
https://fee.org/articles/are-ar-15-rifles-a-public-safety-threat-heres-what-the-data-say/

Wait - 17 deaths a year? Any death is tragic, but that is hardly the earth shattering crisis you fascists claim? Certainly not enough to justify you ending civil rights over.
 
You do no such thing. What you do is put words in other people's mouths and then argue against yourself.

You need to sober up before you type, Guillermo.

The video is of a live exchange between Stewart and Dahm. I had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT'S PRODUCTION.

And since this a printed medium, I can't "put words in other people's mouths" as a simple examination of the chronology of the posts would show.

Also, if I was "arguing against myself", then what explains all the responses or assertions directed at me from your like minded brethren.

Bottom line: Stewart, Taichiliberal = 10 points

Dahm, :orang: = 0 points
 
You need to sober up before you type, Guillermo.

The video is of a live exchange between Stewart and Dahm. I had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT'S PRODUCTION.

And since this a printed medium, I can't "put words in other people's mouths" as a simple examination of the chronology of the posts would show.

Also, if I was "arguing against myself", then what explains all the responses or assertions directed at me from your like minded brethren.

Bottom line: Stewart, Taichiliberal = 10 points

Dahm, :orang: = 0 points

I wasn't talking about the video. I was commenting on your claim that you pwn people. You do no such thing. You assign positions to people and then you argue against those positions...you argue against yourself, not other people.
 
I wasn't talking about the video. I was commenting on your claim that you pwn people. You do no such thing. You assign positions to people and then you argue against those positions...you argue against yourself, not other people.

Look @ U.
 
U R either colossally stupid or else U R Evil....at this point I dont care.

I might be both but I'm not the one you need to worry about. I didn't find Literotica on my own, that was given to me. You need to ask yourself who gave it to me...and you should probably be looking to book exit back to beijing right about now.
 
I might be both but I'm not the one you need to worry about. I didn't find Literotica on my own, that was given to me. You need to ask yourself who gave it to me...and you should probably be looking to book exit back to beijing right about now.

Whaa.
 
You know, there is a chance they will ask me to take you out myself. I can't say I'd hate that.

Hopefully you are not so ignorant that you have not noticed that your reputation is driving South.

This is me being unreasonably hopeful.

Dont get used to it.
 
Hopefully you are not so ignorant that you have not noticed that your reputation is driving South.

This is me being unreasonably hopeful.

Dont get used to it.

I'm dead serious about you. The warning I gave you and...the other warning I gave you. We know who you are.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You need to sober up before you type, Guillermo.

The video is of a live exchange between Stewart and Dahm. I had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT'S PRODUCTION.

And since this a printed medium, I can't "put words in other people's mouths" as a simple examination of the chronology of the posts would show.

Also, if I was "arguing against myself", then what explains all the responses or assertions directed at me from your like minded brethren.

Bottom line: Stewart, Taichiliberal = 10 points

Dahm, = 0 points


I wasn't talking about the video. I was commenting on your claim that you pwn people. You do no such thing. You assign positions to people and then you argue against those positions...you argue against yourself, not other people.

:rolleyes: Over the years, I've come across some amazing excuses from right wing wonks for losing a debate to me or not being able to logically/factually defend their assertions ... But this one by you takes the cake.

You can't logically or factually refute what Stewart puts down in the OP. Instead, you put forth some postulated clap trap that any kid with a G.E.D. in reading comprehension can see through.

Your dodge fails, son. You only convince the joker you see in the mirror and the like minded gun monkeys on this thread/site. Now repeat your nonsense in various forms and declare "victory" because I don't indulge you on it. Carry on.


Stewart, Taichiliberal - 100%

Dahm, :orang: - 0%
 
Back
Top