Stewart stomps pro-gun rhetoric.

[Into the Night]

If you're going to pick up the gauntlet for your equally intellectually impotent/dishonest compadres, try to do better. I mean, your little diatribe is just chock full of accusations, innuendos, generalized historical revisionism with a heavy dose of supposition/conjectured clap trap.

In short, you've got NOTHING....you're talking loud and saying nothing. Your buddy didn't have jack doodle to refute Stewart in the OP....neither do you.

But do continue to blow smoke....for someone not interested in the OP or what I say, you sure waste a LOT of time and space. Get some therapy.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Gun Monkey's and MAGA trolls seldom (if ever) "see" anything outside of what they believe. You keep running to the defense of your brethren, yet NONE of you can logically or factually fault Stewart in the OP.

Now, run-a-long and continue your bluff and bluster. Strangely entertaining.

MAGA is not a person. You deny and discard logic. Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

So you mimic the same stupidity as Zymurgy as if that makes it palatable?

All your BS is just that....BS! A smoke screen to attempt to hide the fact that neither you or you compadres can logically or factually fault Stewart's take down of Dahm's rhetoric.

Let me poke a few holes in that gun monkey hot air balloon of yours with a few simple questions; in your lifetime, have you ever been denied the right to buy a handgun, shotgun, rifle (revolver , bolt action or semi-auto) of various caliber? If so, were ALL alternatives to your choice denied, thus depriving you of your 2nd Amendment rights? And if you're old enough, were you denied the rights of the aforementioned even during the AWB from 1994 to 2004? Or when the Brady Bill was enacted to law in 1993? And in your life time, was there ever a proposal on the House floor to BAN ALL CIVILIAN WEAPONS, RESCIND/NULLIFY THE 2ND AMENDMENT OR CONFISCATE LEGALLY PURCHASED WEAPONS? And if so, did it have support by a sizable number of Democratic congressmen?

If yes to any of those questions, then please supply DOCUMENTED FACTS to show that (NOT your opinion, supposition or conjecture). If no, then spare us all more BS, smoke blowing and foot stomping. Carry on.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Blatant lies. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

1. You seem to think your personal opinion is on par with facts & logic. Pity you refuse to accept that it's not. And since when is posting links to articles to back up an opinion or observation wrong? Just because YOU can't do it doesn't make it wrong or illogical. Quite the opposite. Hell, your like minded brethren do it all the time...it's part of the ADULT debate system. And I do wish you'd stop lying about what others write, as the chronology of the post over the years has shown anything BUT "verbatim" tactics from me. Your troll skills are declining, my friend. Get it together.

Buzzword fallacies. Learn what 'fact' and 'logic' means. You deny and discard both. Assumption of victory fallacy. RQAA.

2. Once again, you keep trying to substitute your opinion for facts. Sorry, but that's not how it works....or were you asleep in junior high when the teacher's explained that to you. I specifically asked you to provide documentation and note exactly what civil rights am I "pimping". Clearly, you can't back up your blather with any valid, documented facts or rational, logical discourse. So you just regurgitate the SOS. That only impresses the dolt you see in the mirror.

Buzzword fallacy. Learn what 'fact' means. RQAA. Argument of the Stone fallacy. You deny and discard logic. Inversion fallacy. Grow up.

3. Man, when you MAGA trolls are put on the spot, you just spew any mental flatulence available. NOTHING you blather on about in this last paragraph addresses the points dismantled by Stewart in the OP. Now suddenly the tactic of MAGA trolls is NOT to discuss anything BUT personal opinion. Anyone can have an opinion...substantiating such or proving it is a whole other smoke. Clearly, YOU cant' logically, factually or even rationally do so. So you may do the usual intellectually impotent/dishonest MAGA shuffle....dodge, repeat, lie, repeat, blow smoke, repeat, act like a child, repeat. I'll just sit back and laugh at you....as will others.

MAGA isn't a person. Bulverism fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.


No arguments presented.

 

[Into the Night]

Please link to the Constitutional Amendment, State or Federal law that says in no uncertain terms that any weapons used by law enforcement is allowed to be owned and used by civilians.

The reading audience awaits.

RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

In the last 25 years, which killed more "children" under 18, AR15's or fentanyl? No fair?

Okay, have AR15's killed more children in 25 years than fentanyl did in 2022 alone?

Yet you fascists demand that civil rights be ended - whilst also demanding the border remain open to allow this poison to flow freely,

Yes I know, democrats get kickbacks from the cartels...

Democrats hate children. They murder them before they are born, they sexually mutilate them, the create psychopaths that like to shoot up schools and create the 'gun free zones' for them to do it in. Children are just pawns to Democrats.

 

[Into the Night]

Denied to buy?

What does that mean?

I live in the Democratic People Republic of California, under Kim Jong Newsom. I am denied the right to buy an AR15 that isn't functionally disabled.

The ultimate GOAL of the fascist left is the disarmament of the populace.

An armed population cannot be ruled.

I call it the SDTC (the Socialist Dictatorship of the Territory of California). You are quite right. King Newsom denies guns.
There is a reason people are fleeing the SDTC.

 

[Into the Night]

And your understanding is wrong.

Inversion fallacy.

We had limits on guns

Unconstitutional.

until the court was lobbied by the NRA

Irrelevant. No court has authority to change the Constitution.

into making a mistake that killed millions of Americans

You can't blame any court.

and made America a scary place.

It is not a scary place, except in Democrat run cities, where Democrats have turned them into hellholes. Nothing to do with guns.

You guys believe NRA crap because you want to.

The 2nd Amendment is not the NRA.

It is factually wrong.

The 2nd Amendment is not wrong. Learn with 'fact' means.

 

[Into the Night]

1. That's nice....doesn't change the FACT that Dahm's gun monkey rhetoric was flatly deconstructed by Stewart for all (rational, logical, honest) to see. But if we all time travel back over 100 years, your little quip will REALLY be a hit!

2. The rest of your paranoia laden gun monkey rhetoric is just the usual MAGA playbook....when you can't refute something you just blather baseless supposition and conjecture coupled with personal attacks. Sad.

My previous response stands valid. Again, for someone not interested in the OP or what I say, you sure waste a LOT of time and space. Get some therapy.
2.

2.

Bulverism fallacy. MAGA is not a playbook. Inversion fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy. Void argument fallacy. Mantra 1d.

 

[Into the Night]

Well my little gun monkey, since I (nor Stewart in the OP video) have NEVER advocated "to end civil rights",

Blatant lie.

your request is pure paranoid fantasy.

Blatant lie. Psychoquackery.

..one that gun monkey's use to interpret ANY logical or factual proposal/argument for gun control.

Unconstitutional.

...ESPECIALLY when they have no logical or rational retort/refutation.

RQAA. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Your self aggrandizing bluff and bluster is pointless

The 2nd Amendment is not bluff and bluster. It is not pointless.

in lieu of the chronology of the posts.

Irrelevant.

But insipid stubbornness is a MAGA mook/gun monkey trait. Carry on.

MAGA isn't a person.

 

[Into the Night]

Oh, I see....it's a number's game! So tell us all, my little gun monkey....how many kids have to die in mass shootings with formerly banned weapons before your ilk acknowledges the need to bring back an AWB law? Number of adults? Both? Come, come now. A facetious comparison of ILLEGAL drug purchases to LEGALLY purchased guns with regards to civilian deaths....your trolling skills are deplorable.

Get it together, son. You've bitten off more than you can chew and subsequently look foolish.

Unconstitutional.

 

[Into the Night]

Just to remove your final BS dodge:

The consistent bleat by you gun monkeys, the gun manufacturers' whores in Congress and LaPierre's lap dogs is that any gun regulation proposal denies Constitutional rights and part of your "freedoms".

Hence the focus of my previous questions.

But if you're too ignorant regarding the very basis for why you're here attempting to discredit Stewart and shore up Dahm, then I suggest you spend to time off line to bone up on the issue. That way, you won't as stupid as you do now as you try to hide your blunder is pointless gun monkey rhetoric.

Oh and for the reading audience interested in clarity. California law states that if you purchased an Ar-15 (style) weapon prior to new law implementation, it's exempt from the new laws in 2022. But as always, gun enthusiast, manufacturer sycophants and usual anti-gov't paranoids can get around such laws: https://www.5dtactical.com/blog/how...=A California compliant AR-15,Thumbhole stock

This DOES NOT prevent our resident gun monkey's from purchasing the rest of the hand guns, shot guns rifles (bolt action, revolver, semi-auto) available https://www.ammunitiondepot.com/blog/what-guns-are-legal-in-all-50-states

So it seems our resident gun monkey doesn't have the intellectual honesty or information to answer the previous posts questions.


Uncensored from 2008 - Zero

Taichiliberal - 100%

Paradox. irrational. You cannot claim guns are not being restricted and that guns are being restricted at the same time.

 

[Into the Night]

PLEASE STOP TRYING TO BE CLEVER....it just makes you look even more stupid than you are.


Then WTF is the 2nd Amendment you gun monkeys are always screeching about? Are you NOW saying that is NOT a guarantee of your RIGHT to buy/own guns? If that's the case, then Dahm's entire stance is bogus, as is your defense of him.

Got that bunky? You just defeated your own argument.

Now get sober, get some sleep and come back tomorrow with an answer to the previous challenge. If not, spare us all more of your gun monkey madness.

RQAA.

 

[Uncensored2008]

1. That's nice....doesn't change the FACT that Dahm's gun monkey rhetoric was flatly deconstructed by Stewart for all (rational, logical, honest) to see. But if we all time travel back over 100 years, your little quip will REALLY be a hit!

2. The rest of your paranoia laden gun monkey rhetoric is just the usual MAGA playbook....when you can't refute something you just blather baseless supposition and conjecture coupled with personal attacks. Sad.

My previous response stands valid. Again, for someone not interested in the OP or what I say, you sure waste a LOT of time and space. Get some therapy.
2.

2.

What country are you in? You get on at 6PM and post until 2AM? Wait, 6PM California time is 9:00 AM in Beijing China.. Hmmmm.

I told you before, i'm not here to debate the deceptively edited propaganda video.

If Stewart wants to create an account, I'll debate him, otherwise you have to make your own arguments.

YOU failed to refute the fact that firearms empower the masses and that the opposition the democrat Reich has to them is that they embolden the peasant caste to view themselves equal to the ruling elite. The goal of the fascist democrat party is absolute power, but an armed populace cannot be ruled absolutely - hence your obsession with disarming the masses.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well my little gun monkey, since I (nor Stewart in the OP video) have NEVER advocated "to end civil rights", your request is pure paranoid fantasy...one that gun monkey's use to interpret ANY logical or factual proposal/argument for gun control....ESPECIALLY when they have no logical or rational retort/refutation.

Your self aggrandizing bluff and bluster is pointless in lieu of the chronology of the posts. But insipid stubbornness is a MAGA mook/gun monkey trait. Carry on.

AND STILL no argument is presented...

You're not capable.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Oh, I see....it's a number's game! So tell us all, my little gun monkey....how many kids have to die in mass shootings with formerly banned weapons before your ilk acknowledges the need to bring back an AWB law? Number of adults? Both? Come, come now. A facetious comparison of ILLEGAL drug purchases to LEGALLY purchased guns with regards to civilian deaths....your trolling skills are deplorable.

Get it together, son. You've bitten off more than you can chew and subsequently look foolish.

You tell me, how many children must die before the democrat vassals close our border and demand that your country stop supplying the precursor materials to Mexico?

Yeah, not as long and the cartels continue to bribe Quid Pro and the Biden Crime Family.

 

[zymurgy]

And your understanding is wrong. We had limits on guns

yeah, but you retards incorporated powers, so now states also must abide by the federal limitations.

 

[zymurgy]

PLEASE STOP TRYING TO BE CLEVER....it just makes you look even more stupid than you are.

blablabla.

you failed to understand the enumerated powers. I am not trying to be clever anymore than you are trying to be retarded. it just is what it is

 

[Uncensored2008]

blablabla.

you failed to understand the enumerated powers. I am not trying to be clever anymore than you are trying to be retarded. it just is what it is

You won't hear from Taichiliberal for 6 to 8 hours.

It's the middle of the night in China...

 

[zymurgy]

You won't hear from Taichiliberal for 6 to 8 hours.

It's the middle of the night in China...

South Korea