“Stop the Steal" rallies

Althea said:
I think they watch because they're trying to determine if she's really a transsexual. She must put a lot of makeup on her Adam's apple, because I can't see it.
Click to expand...

She has definitely had a huge amount of plastic surgery. What she was originally is anyone's guess. And she is big with Log Cabin Republicans.

Is it just me or does Kimberly Guilfoyle look like a transvestite?
 
Walt said:
She has definitely had a huge amount of plastic surgery. What she was originally is anyone's guess. And she is big with Log Cabin Republicans.

Is it just me or does Kimberly Guilfoyle look like a transvestite?
Click to expand...
I think she's getting used to shouting at Jr during normal discussion. I can picture them in the morning screaming at the top of their lungs while planning their day.

It affects the facial muscles, and pretty soon they'll look like clones.
 
Althea said:
WI has same day registration,
Click to expand...
Indeed it does.

Althea said:
and there were no counties with 90% turnout.
Click to expand...
The State AS A WHOLE saw 90% turnout, so particular counties and wards would've seen HIGHER than 90%... potentially even higher than 100%... I have a full time job and a life to live, so I don't have the time to look into every single county and ward and etc, but I know that the State as a whole allegedly saw 90% turnout.... I'm not buying it, especially since that number is not mirrored by neighboring Iowa (~75%) and Ohio (~71.5%), for example...
 
Last edited:
I say all the votes from all the questionable states should be verified, and if Trump lost legitimately, he should then concede, but those votes should be checked.

MI, WI, PA, GA, AZ, NC, NV.

Obviously none of those states have their shit together.
 
gfm7175 said:
Indeed it does.


The State AS A WHOLE saw 90% turnout, so particular counties and wards would've seen HIGHER than 90%... potentially even higher than 100%... I have a full time job and a life to live, so I don't have the time to look into every single county and ward and etc, but I know that the State as a whole allegedly saw 90% turnout.... I'm not buying it...
Click to expand...

Anything over 75% is very on the high side.
 
christiefan915 said:
That's your problem. I gave a source with facts, you gave opinion. Your desperation is palpable.

https://tulsaworld.com/news/nationa...cle_5529dbad-e31a-5159-b1eb-607232c926bf.html
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/pol...alidate-arizona-ballots-debunked/2705410/?amp
https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2020/11/05/trust-index-do-sharpie-pens-invalidate-ballots/
Click to expand...

A fact is not a universal truth nor is it a proof... Learn WTF a fact actually is...

Media "fact checker" sources dismissed on sight. You cannot use them with me either.
 
Legion said:
Genetic fallacy.
Click to expand...
Nope. I simply do not accept certain sources if they are too often wrong/incomplete/etc, whether or not the particular information contained therein happens to be true or false. PolitiFact happens to be one of those sources.
 
StoneByStone said:
Oh, I know. If the votes are for Trump, they must be counted. If they're for Biden, they were fraudulent.
Click to expand...
Nope. While there were many legitimate votes casted for Biden, there seems to have been many illegitimate "votes" "casted" for Biden as well... The Trump Team will need to present evidence of such fraud to the courts. This process is currently happening, and we will see how it plays out.
 
Walt said:
Minnesota did have high turnout, but no one is claiming that high.
Click to expand...
According to the officially posted election results in Minnesota, Minnesota's own website regarding voter registrations, and basic mathematics, Minnesota supposedly had a 91% voter turnout... I'm not buying it.

According to the same sources, but switch MN for WI, WI saw ~90% voter turnout... I'm not buying that either...

IA and OH, on the other hand, saw turnout in the lower to mid 70s, much more reasonable numbers...
 
gfm7175 said:
According to the officially posted election results in Minnesota, Minnesota's own website regarding voter registrations, and basic mathematics, Minnesota supposedly had a 91% voter turnout... I'm not buying it.

According to the same sources, but switch MN for WI, WI saw ~90% voter turnout... I'm not buying that either...

IA and OH, on the other hand, saw turnout in the lower to mid 70s, much more reasonable numbers...
Click to expand...

Fun to see you in tears after your jackoff thread about twump winning 'in the bag' got shot down in flames.
 
gfm7175 said:
A fact is not a universal truth nor is it a proof... Learn WTF a fact actually is...

Media "fact checker" sources dismissed on sight. You cannot use them with me either.
Click to expand...

You are not the sole arbiter of what is or isn't a fact. And you can take that fact to the bank.
 
christiefan915 said:
You are not the sole arbiter of what is or isn't a fact.
Click to expand...
... and neither are you. In a discussion between you and I, BOTH you AND I need to agree on something in order for it to become a fact. Otherwise, it remains an argument.

christiefan915 said:
And you can take that fact to the bank.
Click to expand...
YOU are not the sole arbiter of what a fact is... Sound familiar? ;)

A fact, rather, is an 'assumed predicate'. If you and I happen to agree on that predicate, then it becomes a fact. If not, then it remains an argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top