There's no misogyny, only poor candidate selection on the part of the Democrat party. The DNC deliberately selects the most repulsive and hated women as candidates. The DNC won't even consider any women such as Tulsi Gabbard who had broad, bipartisan support and who were likeable. Tulsi was also attractive, which is the kiss of death in the DNC.
... why Kamala had no chance.
I'd ask you how you pretend to know this, but is this anyone's business?
Yes, I would appreciate you answering this question and showing that you aren't fabricating this just because Vance has you totally intimidated.
I am neither blind nor deaf and I don't "see it" therefore your assertion is false.
There's plenty of misogyny and it's primarily based in religion where women aren't permitted to have leadership and are expected to be submissive to men.
Nope. Over half the country is still breathing a sigh of relief that Trump was elected and not Kamalalalalala.
I don't think this, as I am one such person. Also of note is that you cannot read people's minds, you don't know what other people are thinking and you only speak for yourself.
What media would that be?
Nope. I asked you for your thoughts and you could only give me the list that was handed to you by the people who do your thinking for you.
Ignoring a law is one way of executing that law. If Congress objects they can impeach the President.
Nope. Executive orders only affect the Federal government and no one else.
You don't know what the word "semantics" means, do you?
Nope. Trump does not tell NYC what their traffic laws must be. You don't know what's going on in the world around you, do you?
Trump is returning power to the States and to the people. Your assertion is absurd.
Vance fucks couches.
No. Couch-fuckers don't intimidate me. I've seen the photos!
Yes, because reality to a trumptard is the enemy.
Just for grins, post the video.
Just for grins, post the photos.
What's a "trumptard" anyway? Am I one? Reality is no enemy to me, so is that a "no"?
Well, here's his attempt at denial:
I mean, well, ok:
In the dictionary, the photo next to "trumptard" is you:
Wrong, check Trump’s favorability numbers
You're welcome. You should read all my posts, you might learn something.
Whose fabricated numbers? CNN's? How about you just make up some numbers right now and tell me those? Lay 'em on me.
You gave me someone else's. I wanted yours.
Nope. You need a basic review of the US government.
The funds with which Trump negotiates are totally approved, keeping Trump on solid ground. If Trump were negotiating with funds that had not been approved then he would be in hot water, but as you noted, that is not the case.
Your delusion is very disabling.
Nope. You are in the vocal micro-minority.
I do read all your posts, and they all drain the brain, prompting Congress to debate a series of Federal "Duty of Care" laws to address regulating your category of posts.
As I said, even the Razzy has him underwater (https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/state-of-the-union/direction-of-country)
One of the reasons Trump was elected three consecutive times is that Democrats stupidly allow media to determine their reality instead of doubting, questioning and applying critical reasoning.
Obviously they are not yours when you have to copy-paste the list from whomever is doing your thinking for you.
Nope. The disinformation you have been ordered to believe and to preach is terribly erroneous on a rookie level.
Nope. You should consider hanging it up.
You really should call BS once in while.
America is celebrating the S&P 500's perfect week. Americans all know the country is headed in the right direction.
Which still doesn’t erase the reality I documented that the majority of Americans aren’t loving Trump
One of these days you'll come to realize that you don't speak for anyone but yourself, much less for the majority of Americans. You saw the S&P 500's perfect week; that takes the vast majority of confident Americans to work together to make America great like that. You are objectively in error. You should really try to snap out of your delusion.
Nope. You are EVADING out of cowardice. Fine.
If executive orders actually strengthened the Federal government, every President would have issued several hundred every day.
What question?
Polls are fabrications. They prove nothing. They reveal the pollsters' agenda.
You're a slave to whomever does your thinking for you. When you are finally allowed to think for yourself (which will probably never happen), tell me who your preferred candidate is and why, along with which candidate you believe has the best chance at defeating Vance and why.
I delivered proof, showed you what the majority thought of the direction of the country, you nothing but babbling insults, end that one
You don't even know what the word "proof" means. Hint: you haven't delivered any "proof" of anything.
Polls are propaganda and are rejected. Additionally, your "polls" are unnecessary somescreen distractions aimed to help you EVADE the simple, easy and straightforward question that is being asked.
S&P 500 had a perfect week, providing irrefutable evidence that the vast majority of Americans recognize that the economy is rocking it, all due to Trump being at the helm. Your whining gibberish is absurd and is summarily dismissed.
Same answer for the 3rd time: No, Trump is not controlling anything in New York. You apparently don't know what the word "control" means. Did you drop out of high school or did you simply never attend?
You live for them. You NEED them. Polls represent your hopes and dreams, so you immerse yourself in them so you can cite them when you can't face reality.
Rasmussen is propaganda. They all are.
That's what you're doing. You have no idea what you are talking about and so you are desperate to wriggle out from under this topic.
