IBDaMann
Well-known member
So you need to retract your previous statement if you won't support any candidate who condemns corporate power over people.
Straight Question for the Left (and Everybody Else)
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
Trumpet
Verified User
The Republican call themselves the pro business party, so what does that mean????
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. You ended your sentence in a preposition. "You are too dumb to bother with." is such a rookie error.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
1. First, you omitted two crucial question marks at the end of your sentence.
2. A business is not a corporation. You should ditch your Marxism.
Straight Answer: Gavin Newsom.
As pathetic as this is, it is where the democrats stand right now.
America elected Obama.
Run Kam-Kam again - with Cold Burt as her Veep!
At this moment - it would be little weasel Newsom.
Trumpet
Verified User
Do you understand what the word Marxism mean????
1.) Vance is unbeatable at this moment. If the rest of Trumps term continues - no one will have chance against him.
2.) Gabbard would be slaughtered, She has no party. You may view that as a good thing - but she would have no support from the GOP or the democrats.
The REAL question is "will the democrat party still exist in 2028?"
I'm going to say "no." The Democratic Socialists might put up an AOC/Sanders ticket. The splinter groups that emerge from the old swamp might put Schumer or some other fossil up. None of the parties that rise from the ashes of the democrats will have enough support to challenge the GOP on a national level.
You love leftist celebrities. Most of America does not.
None would stand a chance. I still chuckle that you think a hate monger from hate night TV would be viable as a presidential challenge.
Is there anyone on the extended list I included who you don’t think is “far left?” In your view, every Democrat is “far left”
Not true, to MAGA Trump is all charisma, he can get away with saying anything, rationalize anything, and a quick smile or smirk, MAGA will accept it, Trump doesn’t draw all those crowds because he talks policy
Not true, 2020 proves that incorrect
Nothing could be further from the truth, Truth continues to ignore Congress, actually ruling thru Executive Order, which he has done more times in six months than any other President did in four years. And using the Federal Government to control State and Cities policies he doesn’t like is hardly returning power to the States. Abortion was the SCOTUS
Nah, coming from Hawaii with a mediocre Congressional record, doubtful
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I agree, but that is this one man's opinion.
That's the way I see it ... meaning if I were a betting man, I'd drop a few grand on Vance today at the Wynn Sportsbook in Vegas.
This is where you err. If Gabbard were the nominee for the Democrats, hypothetically, she would have all the Democrat votes, she would have many conservative votes (there are many Republicans and conservatives who really like her) plus she would have DNC operatives cheating feverishly in her favor. Remember, Tulsi has always made regular appearances on Fox News and other conservative venues, all the while she was a Democrat. There is no way anyone can simply erase her fan base.
This is more or less why I created this thread. Like you, I don't see any viability in the imploded Democrat party. I already see things as you do. Now I want to better understand how Democrats and leftists see it and what path forward they imagine exists for them. I honestly don't believe they learned anything from the 2024 election, or from the 2020 election or the 2016 election. I believe that the DNC will continue in the only way they know how, which is completely counterproductive and will hand the 2028 election to Vance, but we'll see.
The Democrat party will still be around in 2028. There is still life at the State and local level, but people are fleeing the Democrat party, and the DNC has lost vast swaths of blacks and hispanics to the Republican party. That damage won't be so readily undone.
I'd be very interested to see that. It would represent a fundamental shift in the DNC power structure because up until 2020, the DNC would simply not allow Bernie Sanders to be their nominee for President. Bernie was blacklisted. I think he still is, and that if he weren't such a socialist that he would have otherwise joined Trump, Gabbard and Kennedy in jumping ship for the Republican party where there is at least a chance.
Correct. I'm trying to gain some insight into who Democrats and leftists would like to see become their nominee, and sympathize with them when the DNC ignores their voices and simply picks the worst possible candidate for them.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Yes, both Epstein (was) and Vance - really into "fisting".
Seriously? Because I have eyes and ears. trump is acting so guilty, you'd have to be blind and deaf not to see it!
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
So this marks the end of my reading your posts. You're not serious, you're a compulsive liar, and just plain stupid. Have fun posting propaganda to yourself!
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You have to admit, all the people you mentioned are on the list because they are rabidly anti-Trump. There are no moderate politicians in the Democrat party anymore. All the moderates jumped ship. All that's left are arch-leftists frothing at the mouth.
Pick one and let's discuss his/her positions.
That is where the Democrat party has positioned itself, and that has nothing to do with me. Consider the party of open borders, killing children, abolishing the 2nd Amendment, rendering the citizenry defenseless, opposing everything that would make America great again ... how can you fit any moderate into that framework?
Nope. Go with what I wrote.
Nope. You seemingly did not learn anything from this past election.
Trump won that election, but it was stolen. Nobody voted for Biden. All his votes were fabricated via cheating.
Trump should ignore Congress when it comes to executing the law. Only the President has any executive power. Congress has none.
Trump only "rules" the Federal government through executive orders. None of the executive orders affect you.
Influence and negotiation are not control. Learn the difference between those words.
Uh, her father is an American.
ZenMode
Well-known member
So, why do they need another crazy person.
A female isn't winning. Too much misogyny.
A crazy female is especially unable to win.
You have some very graphic fantasies.
We can tell what you're into. I assume you learned to enjoy that when you were in prison? China has some brutal prisons, I hear.
It's because you make up everything you post. You're a pathological liar.
Over half the country is antiTrump, the people listed represent that bloc, so they do oppose Trump. and it is noteworthy how you think anyone criticizing or challenging Trump is automatically “arch leftists frothing at the mouth,” you’ve certainly bought the melodrama your media sells
Nah, why, I could pick anyone, and you’d start with the “he said this, she did that,” your thread was inquiring on Democrat potentials for 2028 and I delivered over thirty
Right, and as I have said, sasquatch, Princes Diana, and Jim Morrison were spotted last week doing lunch in Vegas
A President can not execute the law passed by Congress by ignoring that law.
Exactly, he is ruling thru Executive Orders, just as Putin and XI do thru their orders
Use whatever semantics you want, when Trump does something as tell NYC what local traffic laws they can employ in their city it is the President of the US unnecessarily interfering in local affairs, taking power as simple as controlling traffic away from that municipality. Trump is doing what he can wherever he can to concentrate as much power as he can