USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
stupid is as stupid does.
Ironic posts by Desh, still continue to be ironic posts.

stupid is as stupid does.
No, it doesn't, why should she care about a falsehood?
That is your opinion,but you don't want to fuck with us because we are armed to the teeth.
I either bang it on the counter or run hot water over it, then viola'
Language is a wonderful thing.
You go into a shop with a jar of pickles and bang it on the counter?
Why don't you just bang it on the worktop in your kitchen?
![]()
Oh, so you agree with it, then?
[h=1]Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views[/h]
- Weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution
- Link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in our ancestors
- Strength was a proxy for ability to defend or acquire resources
- There is no link between women's physical strength and political views
Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.
Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.
Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.
The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence behaviour today.
Professor Petersen said: ‘While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has - in a sense - always been with our species.’
In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.
With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesised that upper-body strength - a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources - would predict men's opinions about the redistribution of wealth.
The researchers collected data on bicep size, socio-economic status, and support for economic redistribution from hundreds of people in the United States, Argentina and Denmark.
In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...strong-likely-right-wing-political-views.html
LOL
A perfect example...
![]()
Do not be so quick to assume that there do not exist many disciplined among us (the generic us, as I would never consider any action that would be against the almighty all loving wonderful government).
He is (R)ight.
I live in one of the more uneducated states in the USA and there are floods of people ready to start a war over the things Corporate America tells them are true.
Scary! I feel like my home state is that way as well.