rofl. you have no idea of market value or capitalism.. pensioners? lol
I get the older crowd, but I also get the ones who are smart enough not to order on a website exposing their credit/debit card info
I'm on a VPN when I work
Suddenly Fauci wants an investigation into Covid origin
- Thread starter Darth Omar
- Start date
I get the older crowd, but I also get the ones who are smart enough not to order on a website exposing their credit/debit card info
I'm on a VPN when I work
laughing at his claim
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.do...llion-worth-of-unused-hydroxychloroquine/amp/
https://victr.vumc.org/community-fa...at hydroxychloroquine,due to safety concerns.
“Current research suggests that hydroxychloroquine is not safe or effective for treating patients with COVID-19 (as of February 8, 2021). Early in the pandemic, patients may have received hydroxychloroquine under “Emergency Use Authorization,” but it did not reduce morbidity or mortality. The FDA announced a warning on using hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 outside of the hospital setting due to the risk of heart rhythm problems (source). Hydroxychloroquine during this pandemic has taught us to be more cautious of using drugs as emergency treatments without evidence from trials (source). The NIH’s COVID-19 treatment guidelines currently recommends against using hydroxychloroquine, with or without azithromycin, for treating hospitalized or non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19”
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
It's not honest work. Is that what he did? Fleece, con and lie to people? No wonder he loves Trump.
ROFL.. so you listen to a degenerate with no knowledge of infomercials. your TDS is so bad you cant even think clearly - Trump is living in your head rent free.
~~
Producing a half-hour infomercial (direct marketing) can cost anywhere from $25,000 to $250,000, depending on the production values and the host or talent involved in the shoot.
we are regulated by the FTC. it's a $13 billion year industry
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
He supports Trump and Trump's HCQ. Why did Dookie never inject the bleach? Isn't that disloyal to Trump?
I don’t read his post, he’s too far down the rabbit hole. I liked him better on another forum, he came here and lost his mind.He supports Trump and Trump's HCQ. Why did Dookie never inject the bleach? Isn't that disloyal to Trump?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Dookie, every modern American with a television is familiar with "infomercials". Who needs to be briefed on them, in your opinion?
If your infomercials are of the same quality as your posts, then I can see why you never went to Hollywood for the $100/hour gigs.
Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated with worsening disease and safe. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar and Google for all reports on HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19 patients. This included preprints and preliminary reports on larger COVID-19 studies. We examined the studies for efficacy, time of administration and safety. HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe.
Keywords: Azithromycin
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated with worsening disease and safe. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar and Google for all reports on HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19 patients. This included preprints and preliminary reports on larger COVID-19 studies. We examined the studies for efficacy, time of administration and safety. HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe.
Keywords: Azithromycin
Trump didn’t force China into anything, in fact, China played Trump like a worn out deck of cards, while he was talking tough China extended itself and its influence worldwide to include closer ties with Russia, the EU, and developing nations worldwide
And China is never going to allow any really open investigation that leads to their negligence or direct fault, Cotton and such call for a “full investigation” is absurd, strictly political, at best would become a Ron Johnson style charade
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
What other forum?
Agreed he's not thinking clearly. A person who is intelligent and then isn't has suffered a problem; usually either disease or injury. The injury can be physical, psychological or a mixture of both.
People naturally grow and adapt. It's natural for older people to also be more cautious and conservative, but there are extremes to anything. IMO, what Dookie thinks and believes isn't healthy.
Hollywood? WTF?Dookie, every modern American with a television is familiar with "infomercials". Who needs to be briefed on them, in your opinion? If your infomercials are of the same quality as your posts, then I can see why you never went to Hollywood for the $100/hour gigs.
maybe before the Dems ruined that state. CA is actually losing population -and a Congressional seat
"familiar" in the sense you've seen the hype "call now" - the back end business i thought might be interesting
it's not "pensioners" like that doofus utters
A study of studies. It showed that more studies showed no result or a negative result than those that showed a positive result. You should read your propaganda before you post it.
DC junkies, BAC, Althea, anonymoose, Bill, and annatta, plus a few more came here after it’s demise.
Last edited:
you cant be this myopic
China has been doing "One Belt One Road" for at least a decade, it was Bill Clinton (and I'm a Clinton supporter)
that let them into the WTO with delusions of 'it will make them accountable'
But you did stumble onto some thing. The EU acts as a trade block so the EU/China deal IS BILATERAL
too bad they fucked it up ( Comprehensive Agreement on Investment )
The European Parliament Kills China Trade Deal
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-european-parliament-kills-china-trade-deal/
your boy Biden is calling for the same, albeit watered down thru the WHO
it was DC Junkies. Debate Politics is alive and well. but i was here before it's demise.
We examined the studies for efficacy, time of administration and safety.
HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting.
It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use.
No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting,
~~
ROFl you cant even read . its a "systemic review' moron
Correction DC Junkies, too many past political sites
A thought on derivatives
Should someone be able to google PubMed and call that a study? I'd call it a survey of science.
And the survey would only be interesting to the extent that the sorting was meaningful.
If 50 shotguns are shooting at nearby paper targets some cross splatter is to be expected and
the evidence unclear. What exactly is each study doing? What exactly were the methodologies?
What exactly were the results? Who exactly, pulled the studies? What exactly are the criterion
for inclusion? Which studies were statistically "powerful" and which not?
The fact that more said not helpful than helpful is not promising.
Should someone be able to google PubMed and call that a study? I'd call it a survey of science.
And the survey would only be interesting to the extent that the sorting was meaningful.
If 50 shotguns are shooting at nearby paper targets some cross splatter is to be expected and
the evidence unclear. What exactly is each study doing? What exactly were the methodologies?
What exactly were the results? Who exactly, pulled the studies? What exactly are the criterion
for inclusion? Which studies were statistically "powerful" and which not?
The fact that more said not helpful than helpful is not promising.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I've heard of DC Junkies but was never a member. I'm still a member, albeit non-active, on DP.