Suddenly Fauci wants an investigation into Covid origin

Correction DC Junkies, too many past political sites

Yes he was sighted at that site. He was a socialist, I think. Users aren't really assured of anything though.
I have no way to know if this anatta is that one. I could decide to be BAC on some site and pose as
a greed is good capitalist, I suppose.
 
A study of studies. It showed that more studies showed no result or a negative result than those that showed a positive result. You should read your propaganda before you post it.

I can see why intuitively some hypothesized that it could be beneficial. But that was studied specifically:

Hydroxychloroquine does not benefit adults hospitalized with COVID-19 | National Institutes of Health (NIH)

So I would leave it to those professional clinicians who are informed about the science to determine treatments, and not listen to anatta and arm twist a doc if the need arose.

That's just me.
 
I've heard of DC Junkies but was never a member. I'm still a member, albeit non-active, on DP.

You missed out on some fun. Nah, on second thought, pretty much the same dynamic as here. Similar knuckleheads, posers, liars, thieves
But it did have more stalkers! That was a fun feature.
 
Yes he was sighted at that site. He was a socialist, I think. Users aren't really assured of anything though.
I have no way to know if this anatta is that one. I could decide to be BAC on some site and pose as
a greed is good capitalist, I suppose.

Russians used to be socialists. Now they are Putin-cockholsters. More RWed than Left.
 
Yes he was sighted at that site. He was a socialist, I think. Users aren't really assured of anything though.
I have no way to know if this anatta is that one. I could decide to be BAC on some site and pose as
a greed is good capitalist, I suppose.

Style is the same, and he is obviously weak minded and easily influenced. I don't think he has a lot of opinions that were formed on his own. So his political slant is irrelevant. He's a member of the cult now.
 
Yes he was sighted at that site. He was a socialist, I think. Users aren't really assured of anything though.
I have no way to know if this anatta is that one. I could decide to be BAC on some site and pose as
a greed is good capitalist, I suppose.
Oh, that’s right, you were there, too, sorry I forgot.

It’s the same one.
 
You missed out on some fun. Nah, on second thought, pretty much the same dynamic as here. Similar knuckleheads, posers, liars, thieves
But it did have more stalkers! That was a fun feature.
No doubt. I've been on a half-dozen or more the past two decades. Sometimes bouncing back and forth every 6-12 months. You're right about the usual suspects.
 
Style is the same, and he is obviously weak minded and easily influenced. I don't think he has a lot of opinions that were formed on his own. So his political slant is irrelevant. He's a member of the cult now.

Ahh, another famous Russian trait: paranoid but unable to lead themselves without a monarch, Politburo or other single leader. Multiple leaders confuse average Russians because they don't know who to pick....which isn't a genetic defect, IMO, but a purely cultural one.

Culture can take a very long time to change/evolve. Russians will need another 50-100 years to unfuck themselves.

Russians at home, that is. Exports are, like Euro exports to the Americas, usually made of sterner stuff.
 
Yeah. It's like that in the movie, "Outbreak". The cure was already there but remained a secret.

I recently watched "Contagion". It was very good. Keeping both the disease and the cure secret were to prevent panic and service the elite first.

A similar idea came at the end of Dr. Strangelove after the Doomsday Device detonated:

"Doctor, you mentioned the ration of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?"
"Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature"
- General Buck Turgidson & Dr Strangelove


"I think we should look at this from the military point of view. I mean, supposing the Russkies stashes away some big bomb, see. When they come out in a hundred years they could take over... In fact, they might even try an immediate sneak attack so they could take over our mineshaft space... I think it would be extremely naive of us, Mr. President, to imagine that these new developments are going to cause any change in Soviet expansionist policy. I mean, we must be... increasingly on the alert to prevent them from taking over other mineshaft space, in order to breed more prodigiously than we do, thus, knocking us out in superior numbers when we emerge! Mr. President, we must not allow... a mine shaft gap!"
- General Buck Turgidson
 
I recently watched "Contagion". It was very good. Keeping both the disease and the cure secret were to prevent panic and service the elite first.

A similar idea came at the end of Dr. Strangelove after the Doomsday Device detonated:

"Doctor, you mentioned the ration of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?"
"Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature"
- General Buck Turgidson & Dr Strangelove


"I think we should look at this from the military point of view. I mean, supposing the Russkies stashes away some big bomb, see. When they come out in a hundred years they could take over... In fact, they might even try an immediate sneak attack so they could take over our mineshaft space... I think it would be extremely naive of us, Mr. President, to imagine that these new developments are going to cause any change in Soviet expansionist policy. I mean, we must be... increasingly on the alert to prevent them from taking over other mineshaft space, in order to breed more prodigiously than we do, thus, knocking us out in superior numbers when we emerge! Mr. President, we must not allow... a mine shaft gap!"
- General Buck Turgidson

That's a great wisdom.
 

How about a non redundant commission to investigate the origin of the virus? This wouldn’t be ‘yet another’ investigation into the origin it.

Think about that: it’s over a year into a global pandemic that claimed millions of lives and they are *just now* getting serious about investigating how it started. And NOT an investigation led by virologists who may have a stake in the outcome of the investigation.

So yes, we take Fauci’s advice and investigate how the virus originated, finally. But Fauci sits on the side lines.

DESPERATELY TRYING TO SQUELCH THE FACTS OF HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE PANDENMIC ORIGINS....DEFINITELY A POTENTIAL ARKANCIDE VICTIM....
 
WHY ISN'T THE DOJ INVESTIGATING THIS ,INSTEAD OF ILLEGAL HARASSMENT OF GUILIANI, ETC....??? FAUCI CLEARLY LIED TO CONGRESS WHEN HE DENIED NIH FUNDING OF WUHAN, AS FAUCI IS NOW IN FULL "COVER JHIS ASS " MODE...

I GUESS THAT'S ONLY A CRIME WHEN NON-CORON-A-CRATS DO IT....






Tucker Carlson: Anthony Fauci let the coronavirus pandemic happen, why isn't there a criminal investigation?

Fauci exploited a loophole that allowed him to fund research at the Wuhan Lab that likely became COVID-19


How do we assess the Biden administration’s response to COVID? Well, here’s one marker: it tells you pretty much everything that the White House that is supposedly so committed to science chose as its head COVID coordinator a man with no background at all in science or medicine. His name is Jeffrey Zients. Zients ran Joe Biden’s presidential transition team, that’s his qualification. He’s a former management consultant from Bain, who sat on the board of Facebook. Jeffrey Zients is a political operative. That’s who’s overseeing COVID response for Joe Biden. The good news is because Zients isn’t even close to being an actual scientist, he doesn’t talk like one. Occasionally he says things whose significance the rest of us can clearly understand. Read what Zients said on CNN yesterday, and it becomes very clear how the White House understands this pandemic.

CHUCK TODD, NBC: But is the mask going to be something we have with us in a seasonal aspect?

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI: You know, that's quite possible. I think people have gotten used to the fact that wearing masks, clearly, if you look at the data, diminishes respiratory diseases…So it is conceivable that as we go on a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll be spreading these respiratory-borne diseases.



"A year or two or more from now." In other words, never — you’re never taking off the mask. Get ready for a lifetime of filthy wet cotton covering your mouth, reduced oxygen flow to your brain, and a world where every stranger looks the same because no one has a face. When Kamala Harris and her husband kissed the other day while wearing masks, they were giving you a preview of your daughter’s wedding. In a masked world, human beings never really touch each other. Is that public health? No, it’s not public health. It’s a kind of punishment. Tony Fauci is punishing the country — you, us, everyone. The question is: why is he doing that? Maybe he liked it, that’s possible. But you’ve got to think that at least part of Fauci’s authoritarian germ hysterical is a cover for something else. Could it be that Tony Fauci is trying to divert attention from himself and his own role in the COVID-19 pandemic?

~ What do we mean by that? We can’t recommend more strongly a new piece by Nicholas Wade, who for more than 50 years has been one of the preeminent science writers in the world. For 30 years, Nicholas Wade worked for the New York Times, he edited the science section there. But this piece did not run in the New York Times, he edited the science section there. But this piece did not run in the New York Times. It ran on Medium. And the piece explains where the virus almost certainly came from. In it, Wade makes it clear that, more than any other single American, Tony Fauci is responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic.



Wade lays out a nearly insurmountable amount of evidence that this virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Central China. We’ve raised this possibility from the early days of the pandemic. But this piece all but proves it. At the time the outbreak began last fall, the Wuhan lab was conducting experiments on how to make bat viruses infectious to human beings. Those experiments were funded by American tax dollars, the funding for those experiments was approved and directed by Tony Fauci in Washington. It’s hard to believe that, but it’s true, and the piece lays it out.


~So that lab, conducting research on the coronavirus, and how to make it transmissible to human beings, resulted almost certainly infected a lab researcher and spread from there. The first coronavirus patients didn’t come from the so-called wet market as we heard. That was a lie. The first patients of the coronavirus were employees at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Once again, why would the Wuhan lab be conducting experiments like that in the first place? Well, we know that Tony Fauci had authorized payment for the research. For five years -- from 2014 to 2019 -- the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which Fauci runs, and has for decades, pumped money to a group called the EcoHealth Alliance.


The WHO’s investigation into the origins of the virus was fraudulent, and that matters to public health globally. But one thing you’ll notice is that Tony Fauci did not say that. Why? Because once again, he’s implicated in it, personally. The gain-of-function research that Peter Daszak was bragging about in the video we just showed you had, in fact, been banned explicitly by the U.S. government. There was a federal moratorium on the funding of exactly the kind of gain-of-function experiments that went on in the Wuhan lab, to disastrous effects. So why didn't the feds halt its funding to the lab in Wuhan? That is a central question, and Nicholas Wade looked into it.



Here's what he found: "Someone wrote a loophole into the moratorium. The moratorium specifically barred funding any gain-of-function research that increased the pathogenicity of the flu, MERS or SARS viruses. But then a footnote on p.2 of the moratorium document states that 'An exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.'"

And that’s exactly the loophole that was exploited. Who signed off on this? Tony Fauci — possibly along with Francis Collins, the director of the NIH -- invoked that special exception in order to keep funding the Wuhan lab, and the deadly experiments that were going on there. The experiments that clearly went so wrong.







https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tuck...-investigation



THE SAWED OFF LITTLE WEASEL IS DESPERATELY TRYING TO COVER HIS OWN ASS....
 
Rudy fucked himself.

Oh REALLY? BY OPPOSING YOU FUCKING STALINISTS??


WHAT'S THE "BIG CRIME" THAT THE STALINSTS CAN'T SEEM TO NAME???


THEY LIED AND SAID IT WAS ABOUT THE FIRING OF THE CORRUPT AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE , WHICH CAN NEVER BE A CRIME.


YOUR DESPERATION TO CHANGE THE TOPIC FROM THER COVID-FUNDING FAUCI IS DULY NOTED.
 
I've heard of DC Junkies but was never a member. I'm still a member, albeit non-active, on DP.
im still there. But I have to bring my A game to post there- many more intelligent people
( although we do have those here to give due credit) and no trolling insults!

Plus there is a much more international flair and members seem to understand realpolitik dynamics
instead of "Putin's puppet" level of discourse. There are Russiaphobes as well of course.

This place is libertarian,and that greatly appeals.
DP is loaded full rules I dont even bother to start threads;but the threads dont get constant de-railing either
 
Back
Top