“Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed”

Since the Republicans intentionally stacked the court with extreme WHITE WING EXTREMIST ACTIVISTS- LOOKS LIKE THE ONLY FIX NOW IS PLACING TERM LIMITS ON SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.

And since the Republican Justices only seem to serve the Presidents that selected them- 4 years should be the new Term Limit!

No more self-perpetuating self-serving assholes for life.

So, Gecko, you don't like the Dobbs ruling so now we have to have term limits.

That's why the Supreme court justices are appointed for life.

The Founders were a great deal smarter than you, Anchovies.
 
I would say that the Supremes (sic) won this round, Anchovies.

Really, so having the lowest approval rating in history is winning? An institution designed to be viewed as above it all being embarrassed by political scandal is winning?

Then again, you probably still think Trump won in 2020, so your definition of winning ain’t quite the same as everyone one else’s
 
So you're suggesting leftists wouldn't have stacked the court in their favor given the same opportunity??? You people really do think everyone is as stupid as a leftists don't you?

They tried to get rid of Justice Thomas...so they could stack the court.
 
Yet no left leaning Court, nor any Supreme Court I can recall, left or right, ever came under question for the ethical conduct of their Justices, and I am not alone, the opinion of the Court under Rogers has hit a historical low

Irrelevant. If you saw this as a "liberal" court you wouldn't t be mentioning this. We know you don't actually give a shit about ethics.
 
So, Gecko, you don't like the Dobbs ruling so now we have to have term limits.

That's why the Supreme court justices are appointed for life.

The Founders were a great deal smarter than you, Anchovies.

No, the Founders made the appointments for life so that the Justices would be above influence, partisan sway, predetermined by political ideology, which we see with this Court is anything but true
 
Really, so having the lowest approval rating in history is winning? An institution designed to be viewed as above it all being embarrassed by political scandal is winning?

Then again, you probably still think Trump won in 2020, so your definition of winning ain’t quite the same as everyone one else’s

This isn't a high school popularity contest, Anchovies.

Had Dobbs been ruled differently, you would be praising the decision.

Oh, they didn't.
 
Irrelevant. If you saw this as a "liberal" court you wouldn't t be mentioning this. We know you don't actually give a shit about ethics.

Wrong, wrong, and wrong, I’d say you struck out here, although I’d also say you did back on page one
 
When did anyone ever try to get rid of Thomas? You reading the Beck revision of history?

Lots of far left loons were calling for his removal, Anchovies...even you.

The far left loons tried to lynch Thomas before he was confirmed.

He called it a ""high-tech lynching."

It was.
 
Last edited:
This isn't a high school popularity contest, Anchovies.

Had Dobbs been ruled differently, you would be praising the decision.

Oh, they didn't.

No one said it was, but the Founders purposely set up the Court so that the people would have confidence in them, this Court has flushed that confidence

Wrong, this isn’t based on decisions, rather the conduct of those making the decisions, and personally, I recognized the Roberts Court was making decisions based on their ideology rather than understanding of the law way back with Citizens United
 
No one said it was, but the Founders purposely set up the Court so that the people would have confidence in them, this Court has flushed that confidence

Wrong, this isn’t based on decisions, rather the conduct of those making the decisions, and personally, I recognized the Roberts Court was making decisions based on their ideology rather than understanding of the law way back with Citizens United

Every decision made by the three females on the Court were made based on their ideology rather than understanding of the law.
 
That’s all you got, “lots” of people, next

Did, do you want him removed, Gecko?

Be honest now.


AFJ Calls For Justice Thomas's Resignation and ...
Alliance for Justice
https://www.afj.org › article › afj-calls-for-justice-tho...
Apr 6, 2023 — Given his repeated ethical violations over several decades and inability to credibly carry out his public duties, Justice Thomas should resign ..
 
And as I said, Martin Shkreli never did anything illegal, you going to tell us next that was ethical or moral

I'm saying your attempt to lynch Thomas failed - AGAIN.

As for ETHICS, Elena Kagan leaked the Dobbs decision creating violence across the nation and inciting assassination attempts against SCOTUS justices.

That's not just unethical, it's criminal.

Shall I hold my breath waiting for outrage from you, or ANY fascist on this board - or in the media?

I know, Kagan is a leftist, you don't hold her to any laws - uber alles democrat.
 
Wrong, wrong, and wrong, I’d say you struck out here, although I’d also say you did back on page one

The louder you whine the more I know I'm right on the money. There is no chance in hell this would be on your radar if you perceived this as a "liberal" court. Not everyone is as stupid as a leftist.
 
I'm saying your attempt to lynch Thomas failed - AGAIN.

As for ETHICS, Elena Kagan leaked the Dobbs decision creating violence across the nation and inciting assassination attempts against SCOTUS justices.

That's not just unethical, it's criminal.

Shall I hold my breath waiting for outrage from you, or ANY fascist on this board - or in the media?

I know, Kagan is a leftist, you don't hold her to any laws - uber alles democrat.

Wrong, you are lying, flat out lying, there exists absolutely zero proof on who leaked the Dobbs decision, in fact, the only person saying anything in regard to who leaked it is Alito, the same Alito who did leak the Hobby Lobby decision to the very heads of Hobby Lobby

You bring nothing but talk radio rhetoric

NEXT
 
The louder you whine the more I know I'm right on the money. There is no chance in hell this would be on your radar if you perceived this as a "liberal" court. Not everyone is as stupid as a leftist.

You are wrong, and you present nothing to support your claim, can’t be any more erroneous than that
 
Nothing

The SCOTUS was designed purposely by the Founders and previously viewed by most to be nonpartisan, to be the one branch that rose above politics, other two are based upon politics, the Roberts Court is ruining the image and purpose of the Court

your bias is showing

the court has been political since before you and I were born. you continually fail to acknowledge this due to your leftist leanings, every bit as much as those on the right do.
 
Back
Top