Surprise! GOP puts personal wealth above constituents.

zappasguitar

Well-known member
Elected by We The People...but like a good little GOP Party Representative, he only cares about himself!


Watchdog: California Republican trying to kill rail project that could devalue family farmland


A congressional ethics watchdog has again called for an investigation of a California lawmaker who criticized a high-speed rail line that could reduce the value of property he owns.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) renewed its request Monday after Rep. David Valadao (R-CA) testified earlier this month in opposition to the rail project during a hearing of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

The ethics watchdog said Valadao failed to inform his colleagues that he has a financial interest in the rail line, which would run through property owned by the lawmaker’s family.

Many opponents of the high-speed rail line have claimed that it would reduce their property values, and the lawmaker’s family operates Valadao Dairy, which owns hundreds of acres along the proposed route just south of Fresno.

Valadao told the congressional committee that the project was too costly and would have a negative impact on farms and businesses in his district, CREW said, noting that House members may not sponsor legislation or participate in committee proceedings when their own financial interests are involved.

“It seems Rep. Valadao is no more familiar with House ethics rules now than he was six months ago when he first violated them,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW. “As he continues to flout his obligation to inform his colleagues of his financial conflict of interest, it is all the more urgent that the Office of Congressional Ethics conduct a full investigation.”

The group filed its original complaint against Valadao in July after he successfully offered an amendment that would have required the federal Surface Transportation Board to approve the rail project in its entirety rather than allowing incremental approval of new segments.

That amendment could have derailed the entire project if it was passed into law, said the chairman of the high-speed rail authority board.

“Rep. Valadao’s continued advocacy for policies that benefit his own bottom line is seedy, but perhaps unsurprising as it appears to be consequence-free,” Sloan said.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/...l-project-that-could-devalue-family-farmland/
 
This gentleman's behavior aside where do you come up with he is putting himself above his constituents?

From the article "Many opponents of the high-speed rail line have claimed that it would reduce their property values". Seems his interests coincide with his constituents.

Clearly you aren't all that familiar with how unpopular high speed rail has become in California.
 
they are out for themselves.


that means voters catch on after awhile.


they will have no voting block left some day
 
This gentleman's behavior aside where do you come up with he is putting himself above his constituents?

From the article "Many opponents of the high-speed rail line have claimed that it would reduce their property values". Seems his interests coincide with his constituents.

Clearly you aren't all that familiar with how unpopular high speed rail has become in California.

The Times was pointing out recently how the Extremist American madmen have now decided that railways are wicked socialist plots. Aren't you buggers WEIRD!
 
This gentleman's behavior aside where do you come up with he is putting himself above his constituents?

From the article "Many opponents of the high-speed rail line have claimed that it would reduce their property values". Seems his interests coincide with his constituents.

Clearly you aren't all that familiar with how unpopular high speed rail has become in California.


He is an elected official.

Elected to put what's best for the state and the constituents he represents ahead of his own personal concerns.

Apparently he's more concerned with the value of his personal property than he is doing what the constituents voted overwhelmingly FOR.
 
He is an elected official.

Elected to put what's best for the state and the constituents he represents ahead of his own personal concerns.

Apparently he's more concerned with the value of his personal property than he is doing what the constituents voted overwhelmingly FOR.

What did his constituents vote for?
 
well its why the Rs have to cheat in elections.

the people wont go along with the sociopathic plans of the right
 
Really?

Californians voted OVERWHELMINGLY FOR high speed rail.

But then, you knew that and you were just playing the clueless rube persona to avoid admitting the truth.

HIS constituents. He wasn't elected by the whole state. Why don't you show me what HIS constituents voted for. Why don't you show how HIS constituents feel about high speed rail today.
 
HIS constituents. He wasn't elected by the whole state. Why don't you show me what HIS constituents voted for. Why don't you show how HIS constituents feel about high speed rail today.

The point, which you once again managed to divert this discussion away from, is that a REPRESENTATIVE with an obvious conflict of interest, should disqualify himself, not use his position for personal gain.
 
And if Taft has joined the discussion then it must be time for him to try and derail yet another thread.

If the California congressman had advocated in favor of high speed rail, and now opposes it because it negatively impacts him, then he would be as hypocritcial as Robert Kennedy Jr.

Is that debatable?
 
The point, which you once again managed to divert this discussion away from, is that a REPRESENTATIVE with an obvious conflict of interest, should disqualify himself, not use his position for personal gain.

I agree with you. He should recuse himself. But look at the subject of your thread which YOU wrote. I am addressing YOUR subject. That's not diverting attention away from anything. And I notice you didn't have a response for that.
 
Surprise! GOP puts personal wealth above constituents.

That is your subject heading Zap. Please tell me how I am 'diverting' the subject away by discussing what his constituents want.
 
anyone who even remotely believes that ALL politicians, republican AND democrat alike, don't act in the same manner is too stupid to vote.

I guess I am. Hmm. Because I'm under the impression that politicians are individuals, with different constituencies, different personal methodologies, and different policies.
 
I guess I am. Hmm. Because I'm under the impression that politicians are individuals, with different constituencies, different personal methodologies, and different policies.

puhlease. any 'individual' who even comes close to straying away from the party ideology and establishment is quickly thrown under the bus and forgotten.
 
:rofl2:

The liberal sheep of course bought into the high speed rail line bullshit and voted for it. Then the real information started coming out about the project and more people are waking up that its just another liberal boondoggle to piss away billions of taxpayer dollars.


Voters in 2008 approved $10 billion in bonds to start construction on an 800-mile rail line to ferry passengers between San Francisco and Los Angeles in 2 hours and 40 minutes, compared with 6 hours by car now during good traffic. Since then, the housing market collapsed, multibillion-dollar budget deficits followed, and the price tag has fluctuated wildly — from $45 billion in 2008 to more than $100 billion in 2011 and, now, $68 billion.

Political and financial compromises led officials to scale back plans that now mean trains will be forced to slow down and share tracks in major cities, leading critics to question whether it will truly be the 220-mph "high-speed rail" voters were promised.
Construction has been postponed repeatedly, and a court victory this summer by opponents threatens further delays; a Sacramento County Superior Court judge said the state rail authority's plan goes against the promise made to voters to identify all the funding for the first segment before starting construction.

Even the former chairman of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, Quentin Kopp, has turned against the current project, saying in court papers that it "is no longer a genuine high speed rail system."



:rofl2:

More hard hitting investigative reporting by rawstory....
 
Back
Top