Wait, so he was sent to congress to vote in FAVOR of high speed rail? Then his constituents(who in the best traditions of rural America, are probably his friends and neighbors), realize that this project is not beneficial to them, so they tell the guy to lobby AGAINST it? Am I getting this right? So now, because he has some skin in the game, his constituents are denied representation?He is an elected official.
Elected to put what's best for the state and the constituents he represents ahead of his own personal concerns.
Apparently he's more concerned with the value of his personal property than he is doing what the constituents voted overwhelmingly FOR.
Who isn't?
It's your tory quislings who go for it over here, you know. Message scrambled, or one law for the herrenvolk and another for the untermenschen?
The liberal sheep of course bought into the high speed rail line bullshit and voted for it. Then the real information started coming out about the project and more people are waking up that its just another liberal boondoggle to piss away billions of taxpayer dollars.
Voters in 2008 approved $10 billion in bonds to start construction on an 800-mile rail line to ferry passengers between San Francisco and Los Angeles in 2 hours and 40 minutes, compared with 6 hours by car now during good traffic. Since then, the housing market collapsed, multibillion-dollar budget deficits followed, and the price tag has fluctuated wildly — from $45 billion in 2008 to more than $100 billion in 2011 and, now, $68 billion.
Political and financial compromises led officials to scale back plans that now mean trains will be forced to slow down and share tracks in major cities, leading critics to question whether it will truly be the 220-mph "high-speed rail" voters were promised.
Construction has been postponed repeatedly, and a court victory this summer by opponents threatens further delays; a Sacramento County Superior Court judge said the state rail authority's plan goes against the promise made to voters to identify all the funding for the first segment before starting construction.
Even the former chairman of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, Quentin Kopp, has turned against the current project, saying in court papers that it "is no longer a genuine high speed rail system."
More hard hitting investigative reporting by rawstory....
Zap, I go back to this previous post I made. The numbers you presented were from the 2008 ballot initiative. This poll is from Sept 2013 which shows 52% against and 43% for the train. We don't have his district breakdown here but clearly public opinion in the state has changed so I would submit the Congressman is not acting against his constituents wishes.
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/28/local/la-me-poll-high-speed-rail-20130928
To back up your claim we would have to know how his district voted. We don't have that info so your claim can't be confirmed or denied.
The numbers I presented were from the last LEGAL AND BINDING election which CLEARLY stated the voters decision, and all you've got in response is another unscientific poll.
Wacko is just desperately grasping at straws now.
I provided the voting tallies from the counties that comprise District 21.
If you've got some numbers that counter what I provided, then let's see them.
Otherwise stop whining.
The partisan hack from the OP should shut up and support the propositions the voters in his district VOTED for.
Bullet trains are the future in this world.
why does the right fight anything that would improve this country?
Bullet trains are the future in this world.
why does the right fight anything that would improve this country?
LOL! How does support or non support for a bullet train make one partisan? And so if you complain about anyone elected in Texas are you a partisan hack? Should you shut up and support what everyone else in your district and state wanted?
We know through our buddy Zap that polls are unscientific and mean nothing but for shits and giggles Desh why is do polls show over 50% of folks in very blue California being against high speed rail?
Why is it you don't want to discuss how voters already VOTED FOR the train?
Why is it you don't want to discuss the Representative from District 21 ignoring the voters in his District who clearly said they want this train, and all for his own greedy personal monetary gain?
Enough diversion...you obviously never wanted to have a real discussion about this.
It was always just more obfuscation.
Now you try and change the subject again.
What happened to you? You used to be able to stick to the topic, now it's all just evasion, diversion and obfuscation.
I agree with you. He should recuse himself. But look at the subject of your thread which YOU wrote. I am addressing YOUR subject. That's not diverting attention away from anything. And I notice you didn't have a response for that.
Kind of like you and my question about where you stood on the unemployment compensation extension and you said you had gotten your first check last week, as if that mattered on a question I asked this morning!