SWEET - Fox stooge Napolitano STUNNED by Mueller 3-D chess move on Manafort

Cohen so what? why should I wait more? Corsi is being persecuted, Stone as well.
Either you follow this or you don't. you have no idea just how this bunch can >squeeze< to get what they want.
I'm not even talking 'the truth' I'm talking about what they wanna hear.


They are a collection of scalawags.. The truth is they are Trump's minions. Trump has surrounded himself with these kinds of people his whole life.

Perhaps you think lying to Congress is unimportant.
 
They are a collection of scalawags.. The truth is they are Trump's minions. Trump has surrounded himself with these kinds of people his whole life.

Perhaps you think lying to Congress is unimportant.
Lying to Congress isn't Russian collusion.
 
Hello noise,

it's basically fake news driven by a fake investigation into fake Russian collusion..

He's going after Corsi now - for forgetting an Email! this despite Corsi's full cooperation.

I saw Corsi last night -he said Mueller was demanding he cough up a Wikileaks contact -or lie about it under oath.
Such a fine bunch of American persecutors they are.

Wow. That's some amazing gymnastics.

Do you normally take the side of the accused as a matter of course?
 
Hello noise,

Lying to Congress isn't Russian collusion.

Do you maintain that the only thing Mueller is empowered to find is collusion, and that's not even a crime, so the whole thing is pointless?

That sounds safe for your side.
 
Hello noise,



Do you maintain that the only thing Mueller is empowered to find is collusion, and that's not even a crime, so the whole thing is pointless?

That sounds safe for your side.
collusion = criminal or corrupt conspiracy, does that help you make your case? no.

Without Russian collusion this whole thing is meaningless.
We meddle in Russian elections, they did FB ads and troll organization on ours.
Nothing new here, and certainly not worth a special prosecutor
 
Money laundering and tax evasion is a crime .. and all Trump's cronies are involved in that. Do you defend having a small criminal gang in power?
you have to go back way before Trump was POTUS if that has any merit. If.
If it isn't about Trump as POTUS or the campaign itself -what's the point to our republic now?

Suppose Trump was going to build in Moscow in return ( a fictional quid pro quo for discussion here) for moving an oligarch's money? How does that effect our government now? it doesn't.

It's a witch hunt.
 
collusion = criminal or corrupt conspiracy, does that help you make your case? no.

Without Russian collusion this whole thing is meaningless.

If we have a President who is a crook; who uses the office for personal gain, that is not meaningful?

We meddle in Russian elections, they did FB ads and troll organization on ours.
Nothing new here, and certainly not worth a special prosecutor

If we do something, does that automatically make it OK?
 
Relax everyone. I was just listening to Faux News on the way home from the YMCA. There aint nuthin to all this Mueller stuff. Mueller is tricking people into lying with "perjury traps" designed to catch people lying, you know, like not remembering the exact date of an email or meeting or who called you one day a couple of years ago. In fact, before the investigation started, there were no crimes, Mueller and the 12 angry Democrat Hilly and Obama lovin FBI agents made it all happen. Trump is nearly a saint. I can almost see Fox being ran off the air, it is nothing but propaganda 24/7.
 
Well said, mak2:

Relax everyone. I was just listening to Faux News on the way home from the YMCA. There aint nuthin to all this Mueller stuff. Mueller is tricking people into lying with "perjury traps" designed to catch people lying, you know, like not remembering the exact date of an email or meeting or who called you one day a couple of years ago. In fact, before the investigation started, there were no crimes, Mueller and the 12 angry Democrat Hilly and Obama lovin FBI agents made it all happen. Trump is nearly a saint. I can almost see Fox being ran off the air, it is nothing but propaganda 24/7.

ROTFLMAO

:rofl2:


:hand::hand::hand::hand::hand::hand::hand::hand::hand::hand::hand:
 
I think of it this way.

Trump is cancer.

Impeachment is chemo therapy.

We can't just pretend this will go away if we dress it up and smooth it over.

We would be naive to think it wouldn't repeat if it were not dealt with definitively. That's what justice is for.

IF the Republicans in the House would initiate the impeachment proceedings...I would say...go for it. And I am talking about a significant number of Republican...at least a dozen...preferably more. This CANNOT be a partisan undertaking...or even a perceived partisan undertaking.

If the Democrats initiate the impeachment proceedings...this country is going to be torn apart...with riots and chaos. We will be ruined as a Republic...and end up being a laughing stock...WITH A HUGE NUCLEAR ARSENAL. (And as a partisan move...this has no chance whatsoever to end in conviction. It will be nothing more than showtime...which might be a greater defeat for justice than just leaving it be.

The "cure" may be worse for our Republic than the proposed "cure."

That is my take.

Obviously we disagree...which is fine.
 
I think of it this way.

Trump is cancer.

Impeachment is chemo therapy.

We can't just pretend this will go away if we dress it up and smooth it over.

We would be naive to think it wouldn't repeat if it were not dealt with definitively. That's what justice is for.

Not to be a nit-picker, but what do you intend to impeach Trump for lol?
 
Not to be a nit-picker, but what do you intend to impeach Trump for lol?

PoliTalker isn't going to impeach shit

the Dem Congress may impeach if it's deemed expedient

the charges?......obstruction of justice, defrauding the United States (COLLUSION with a foreign enemy), money laundering and bank fraud for starters
 
two things:

first you have no idea if he's already been indicted.........ever hear of a sealed indictment Perry Jr?

second apparently you don't know the all police everywhere squeeze crooks from the bottom up, not the other way around

Trump and GOP are pretty damn desperate now, just like you

Ha! This is great. Tear PostmortemPussy a new one, RG. He has no idea what Trump's about to face now. He just continues to sit back and suck Trump's dick.

Sad.

raw
 
PoliTalker isn't going to impeach shit

the Dem Congress may impeach if it's deemed expedient

the charges?......obstruction of justice, defrauding the United States (COLLUSION with a foreign enemy), money laundering and bank fraud for starters

So, The Resistance had no idea what they intended to impeach Trump for only that they intended to?

But that’s where Mullet comes in. I think I’m up to speed now.
 
IF the Republicans in the House would initiate the impeachment proceedings...I would say...go for it. And I am talking about a significant number of Republican...at least a dozen...preferably more. This CANNOT be a partisan undertaking...or even a perceived partisan undertaking.

If the Democrats initiate the impeachment proceedings...this country is going to be torn apart...with riots and chaos. We will be ruined as a Republic...and end up being a laughing stock...WITH A HUGE NUCLEAR ARSENAL. (And as a partisan move...this has no chance whatsoever to end in conviction. It will be nothing more than showtime...which might be a greater defeat for justice than just leaving it be.

The "cure" may be worse for our Republic than the proposed "cure."

That is my take.

Obviously we disagree...which is fine.

Disagreement is part of the Diversity that makes America great!

I don't want to see the Dems go at this half-baked. I would much rather see Mueller conclude his investigation before that. And if that gives the Democrats a red meat reason to make a case, then it is their job to convince Republicans they have to impeach one of their own. I don't think the House should initiate impeachment strictly along partisan lines. Agreed, that would be bad.
 
Not to be a nit-picker, but what do you intend to impeach Trump for lol?

LOL.

Too funny.

You know, you can twist things any way you like if it helps divert attention away from things you don't like.

Me? I'm going to keep as open a mind as possible about this. I've made it clear what I would like to see happen in the event that serious charges are brought against the President. But hey. If he's clean, no big. We'll just do everything possible to vote him out in less than 2 years. His record is enough to get him tossed at the ballot box, going up against a generic Dem candidate.
 
If we have a President who is a crook; who uses the office for personal gain, that is not meaningful?



If we do something, does that automatically make it OK?
that's an emoluments clause argument, and it's completely bogus as well.
where is the conspiracy?
 
Back
Top