Sydney Leathers on Seducing a Politician and Maureen Dowd

Aoxomoxoa said:
I wouldn't mind but she is hardly a looker.

][/QUOTE]

I love the fact that I now get comments from women here all the time about what a misogynistic pig you are. There is not one woman posting here that has one iota of respect for you, or anything good to say. With the possible exception of Annie whom I don't talk to.

In your mind this is all "The Darlak's" fault.

You did it all on your own of course.
Click to expand...
 
tekkychick said:
Nina Hartley is cool. and her basic point - there's good porn and bad porn and feminists can still like good porn - I agree with.

but the woman in the column quoted in the op is really gross.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I definitely don't think for a second that a woman's feminism is impacted by what she likes sexually. I have read young feminists hand-wringing over domination fantasies. Pretty silly.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
I wouldn't mind but she is hardly a looker.

sydney-leathers-bikini-photos-015-480w.jpg
Click to expand...

Yeah, agreed. I've always thought if you're going to cheat (or potentially ruin your career by cheating) if better be with someone better looking (possibly much better) than you are currently with or in the case of risking your career very hot. It still doesn't justify cheating but it's a lot more understandable.
 
cawacko said:
Yeah, agreed. I've always thought if you're going to cheat (or potentially ruin your career by cheating) if better be with someone better looking (possibly much better) than you are currently with or in the case of risking your career very hot. It still doesn't justify cheating but it's a lot more understandable.
Click to expand...

Yes exactly why risk your whole career for a munter. It must be something about US politicians, Bill Clinton was the same with Monica Lewinsky. She claims to have lots of men running after her, I can only say that they should go and get their eyes tested.
 
It's amazing when you compare the thoughtful posts of the women on this thread to the mindless wanking of the men. However I will stipulate that the thoughtful men here simply did not post on this thread. So, it's skewed.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
I wouldn't mind but she is hardly a looker.

sydney-leathers-bikini-photos-015-480w.jpg
Click to expand...


you guys would fuck her in a second and you know it.

You just do the guy bullshit about "OH I could get a hotter girl".


post your pictues and let the girls here talk about YOUR fuckability score.
 
Darla said:
It's amazing when you compare the thoughtful posts of the women on this thread to the mindless wanking of the men. However I will stipulate that the thoughtful men here simply did not post on this thread. So, it's skewed.
Click to expand...

Men use their money and/or power to try to get women. This woman is using her feminine wiles to get powerful or rich men (or maybe not rich men but men who are dumb enough to give her their money). Seems like two sides playing the same game to me.
 
evince said:
you guys would fuck her in a second and you know it.

You just do the guy bullshit about "OH I could get a hotter girl".


post your pictues and let the girls here talk about YOUR fuckability score.
Click to expand...

Well if you had paid attention , which you never ever do, you would have known that we were talking about Weiner.
 
evince said:
you guys would fuck her in a second and you know it.

You just do the guy bullshit about "OH I could get a hotter girl".


post your pictues and let the girls here talk about YOUR fuckability score.
Click to expand...

If I'm not mistaken Anthony Weiner was leading in the polls to become the next Mayor of New York City. That's a pretty high profile job. You can't find it that surprising that people are interested in and are talking about the woman that helped bring him down.
 
cawacko said:
Men use their money and/or power to try to get women. This woman is using her feminine wiles to get powerful or rich men (or maybe not rich men but men who are dumb enough to give her their money). Seems like two sides playing the same game to me.
Click to expand...

Isn't it wonderful how you Americans have taken to our slang words with such gusto. I will make my job to introduce some more to your impoverished lexicon. Have you come across 'munter' before?
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
Isn't it wonderful how you Americans have taken to our slang words with such gusto. I will make my job to introduce some more to your impoverished lexicon. Have you come across 'munter' before?
Click to expand...

Can't say I have that word used. What does it mean?
 
cawacko said:
If I'm not mistaken Anthony Weiner was leading in the polls to become the next Mayor of New York City. That's a pretty high profile job. You can't find it that surprising that people are interested in and are talking about the woman that helped bring him down.
Click to expand...

Our problem is that so far it seems like the men's comments have only been about her looks, not the substance of the issue. Just whether or not you would have sex with her. This really isn't all about you guys.

And please, evince - we don't want these guys pics on this forum; don't invite that!!!
 
tekkychick said:
Our problem is that so far it seems like the men's comments have only been about her looks, not the substance of the issue. Just whether or not you would have sex with her. This really isn't all about you guys.

And please, evince - we don't want these guys pics on this forum; don't invite that!!!
Click to expand...

I don't think you'll find it surprising (or disagree with the idea) that I can't add a whole lot to the discussion on this woman and feminism. I did enjoy reading the different woman's opinions on this board who posted about it though.

As for substance kind of like I said before she's gaming on men like men have gamed on woman. That doesn't mean I agree with her actions. As for Weiner the guy had a second chance and blew it. I have no sympathy for him (as far as losing his chance to be Mayor).
 
tekkychick said:
Our problem is that so far it seems like the men's comments have only been about her looks, not the substance of the issue. Just whether or not you would have sex with her. This really isn't all about you guys.

And please, evince - we don't want these guys pics on this forum; don't invite that!!!
Click to expand...

Her looks are very material to the issue, as it boggles the mind what he saw in her and indeed how she was able to get so many men. It is you and others who want to impose a holier than thou spin on it, as if women are so much more pious and never discuss men's attributes. What do you mean by 'our problem'?
 
Last edited:
tekkychick said:
Nina Hartley is cool. and her basic point - there's good porn and bad porn and feminists can still like good porn - I agree with.

but the woman in the column quoted in the op is really gross.
Click to expand...
That's what's so cool about Nina....she's not only a sex positive feminist but she's got a killer butt too! :)
 
Darla said:
I'd be interested in reading the professor she is responding to as well. She makes some good points but I bet that professor does too. However, I am very supportive of sex-workers, and do not agree with shaming them.
Click to expand...
Well I think she made a very valid point in that the Prof avoided a discussion with her. I'd have to give the courage of her convictions to Nina.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top