If that were the case, Bush's administration would have used it as an excuse to invade, it would have made it more legitimate at the time because of 911, instead, they used the WMD excuse. Both being bogus.
I do not expect from someone who do not know and understand common history and strategy to understand.
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking
He *DID* use it as a reason to invade Iraq.
Are you also only 12 years-old and have no personal recollection of the leadup to the invasion of Iraq?
Just because your liberal overlords keep beating the mantra into your head that the only reason for the invasion was WMDs, does not make it so.
There was a whole case laid out against Saddam, of which WMDs were only a piece of.
Google the Salman Pak training facility, the Boeing 707 airplane fuselage used for terrorist training.
Do some reading for God's sake, instead of mouthing outdated disproven talking point.
Oh hey, I posted the links verifying that Saddam was offering $25K rewards to the surviving family members of suicide bombers in Israel.
You know, the thing I posted that you said I couldn't prove, but which everyone with half a brain already knew anyway?
Yeah, that.
He *DID* use it as a reason to invade Iraq.
Are you also only 12 years-old and have no personal recollection of the leadup to the invasion of Iraq?
Just because your liberal overlords keep beating the mantra into your head that the only reason for the invasion was WMDs, does not make it so.
There was a whole case laid out against Saddam, of which WMDs were only a piece of.
Google the Salman Pak training facility, the Boeing 707 airplane fuselage used for terrorist training.
Do some reading for God's sake, instead of mouthing outdated disproven talking point.
He *DID* use it as a reason to invade Iraq.
Are you also only 12 years-old and have no personal recollection of the leadup to the invasion of Iraq?
Just because your liberal overlords keep beating the mantra into your head that the only reason for the invasion was WMDs, does not make it so.
There was a whole case laid out against Saddam, of which WMDs were only a piece of.
Google the Salman Pak training facility, the Boeing 707 airplane fuselage used for terrorist training.
Do some reading for God's sake, instead of mouthing outdated disproven talking point.
This from a non liberal source.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/beating-the-dead-horse-of-salman-pak/
You liberals just make up shit as you go along...
Christ on His throne... how does one person get so dense?
I said there were terrorist training camps in Iraq. You rebut this with a link saying there was no Saddam-Al Qaeda link?
Is Al Qaeda the world's only terrorist organization? Saddam was paying suicide bombers striking in Israel...
That's just the tip..
Your link says interrogations of *SADDAM* prove this.
Al Qaeda was known to be inside Iraq prior to the invasion. The contention from the left has been that Al Qaeda was inside Iraq without Saddam's approval.
LOL!
I assure you, *NO ONE* did anything in Iraq without Saddam's approval. And if you're really interested in a discussion about it, you can YouTube the old video of the late Christopher Hitchens smashing Bill Mahr on this point.
Really... you're impossible.
Yeah. Saddam had a real need for COUNTER TERRORIST training....lol.
Your wrong and you refuse the facts to remain wrong
Your not believing the facts doesn't change them.
Your religious zeal to believe something relayed from a New Yorker magazine article is noted.
Yet, that does not make it fact.