Teachers & Guns? Seriously?

J Craft said:
A volunteer quorum of teachers/staff based on student population for its size, who would be subject to rigorous, regular training-would be bad why?
Click to expand...

Well, for starters they need a psych evaluation so they don't brandish a gun to break up a fight, or vague threaten an unruly kid, or actually pull a gun on a kid feeling their oats and wants to fight a teacher? And who is going to pay for all this training and selection. I wonder how many ex-military folk who actually became teachers think of this harebrained scheme as a legitimate solution?
 
Teflon Don said:
This is going to be a great issue for exposing the left for their gun grabbing ways. This will be like DACA for the left. Trump will crush them.

With DACA the said “amnesty or nothing” while Trump put out reasonable proposals after another.

Trump will play the democrats the same way on this. He will offer up many things just short of banning guns and the democrat party true to form will say NO. We only want banning of the 2nd Amendment.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Like your con man leader, a lot of hype and wish list statements....way short on substance.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Oh wow, almost forgot to sprinkle your Acme Attention Whore Crumbs today! Sorry about that, got a life and all that, you know.

You remember weird shit that never happened, like that imaginary husband, shopping at Neimann-Marcus, living in a wealthy Jewish neighborhood, golfing every day, selflessly serving the poor, being a teacher, having sex with an actual human, etc.

Oh, and darn... nothing so far from Goodreads about those groups you're so obsessed with that you supposedly reported. Imagine that. lol

Heard you had quite a few meltdowns today, hope Saturday is better!
Click to expand...

Poor Top:-( ~
 
RB 60 said:
My "Constitutional right" does not allow anyone to break any laws. Please show us where it does.
Not one of my firearms "has murdered many innocent lives." How on earth can you make such a misleading statement?
Guns have always been a "normality" in this country, for both protection and for hunting.


"Was it not a human with a gun (a human bearing arms) that has conducted the mass shootings??? "

That's a stupid question! Of course it was, a human who broke a number of existing laws.
Click to expand...

Your Constitutional Right is to bear arms to form a militia....a guarantee to military arms for that purpose only....not a general allowance for military arms in the general population. Hence the AWB back in 1994.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Well, for starters they need a psych evaluation so they don't brandish a gun to break up a fight, or vague threaten an unruly kid, or actually pull a gun on a kid feeling their oats and wants to fight a teacher? And who is going to pay for all this training and selection. I wonder how many ex-military folk who actually became teachers think of this harebrained scheme as a legitimate solution?
Click to expand...

Add to that the armed teacher would need physical self defense classes to keep an enraged student from overcoming them and taking their weapon..... essential in a work place where the majority of the teachers are female and thus smaller than males.
 
Darth Omar said:
Lol.

How about surgeons with guns lol? I know at least two [who shall remain nameless] who carry into our ‘gun free hospital’ every day. My buddy keeps his in his locker. Some women keep them in their purse in their locker.

Gun free zones are joke. People who carry ignore the sign. Psychos with guns, just ignore the sign. There’s hardly anything goofier than thinking being in a gun free zone makes you safe from guns. If you’re inclined to worry about such things.

Of the many things that need to be on the table, voluntarily armed teachers is one of them. Or we can go back to scapegoating the NRA or advocate for more gun free zones.
Click to expand...

See chuckles, no one is laughing at the FACT that assault rifles have been used in the increasing frequency of mass shootings. Take those out of the equation, and you lessen the problem. Arming civilians like the old Wild West is a nasty shootout with stray bullet victims waiting to happen. the country is rift with "gun free zones", genius...so according to you the death toll via criminal/crazy acts should be through the roof. Yet it isn't.

If you can't protect yourself with the plethora of weapons that are NOT on the AWB of 1994 list, then you're just a lousy shot....or a paranoid fool.
 
Mason said:
You really have lost your senses!
I can just see a guy with body armour, and a assault rifle being brought down by our favorite ex-teacher and her 22!
Click to expand...

They forget about the joker in the movie theater a few years ago. Imagine some CCW clown pulling his piece for a shootout in that dark theater...or trying to explain to the cops with gun in hand "NOT ME, THE OTHER GUY!".
 
Gotcha68 said:
It's self defense if someone is attacking you and you feel your life is in danger. If someone (the govt) knocks on your door and says you need to hand over your gun, are you going to start shooting right then and there?
Click to expand...

But since that hasn't happened in my lifetime...and I'm old, jack....that boogeyman you NRA flunkies have been parroting just ain't cutting it anymore. I more scared of the right wing separatist and neo-Nazi types with guns then gun regulation.
 
Gotcha68 said:
I wonder how motivated black teachers would be to arm themselves and then get caught up in a school shooting where cops arrive and the first thing they see is a black person with a gun?

Thinking about that I forgot that damn near all school shootings have been done by white males but I doubt that fact will come into play if a black person is seen with a gun.
Click to expand...

Bravo!
 
leaningright said:
You can’t think that arguing from a position of logic is going to get through? ;)
Click to expand...

Smarterthanayew has never argued from a position of logic. According to him, vehicles in a modern society "cannot be necessary" because they are not mentioned in the Bill of Rights.

There's his "logic".
 
When I recall some of the assholes teaching at my college I'm 100% certain that anybody wanting to actually arm them must be an alien banished from Moronworld for being too stupid.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Well, for starters they need a psych evaluation so they don't brandish a gun to break up a fight, or vague threaten an unruly kid, or actually pull a gun on a kid feeling their oats and wants to fight a teacher? And who is going to pay for all this training and selection. I wonder how many ex-military folk who actually became teachers think of this harebrained scheme as a legitimate solution?
Click to expand...

And the conservative goes hmmmm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top