Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
^^^Still hallucinating I see.
Psycho
^^^Still hallucinating I see.
^^^There is no such thing as an 'assault rifle'.
No stupid, I just didn't understand whether you wanted documentation or anecdotes.
Now, pay attention: I was wrong in my statement. Handguns used in mass shootings outnumber rifles in the last 30 years.
However,
One has to check the number of victims in each case, as law enforcement determines that just 2 or more victims warrant the mass shooting labels. Also, one has to remember what weapons used were on the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban list that sunset in 2004. Hope these following helps:
https://everytownresearch.org/maps/mass-shootings-in-america/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/476409/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-weapon-types-used/
https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/4296/text
No, here I challenge YOU to provided fact based valid sources to support what you say. Clearly, you can't do that. But you like the intellectual courage and honesty to concede such.
Note: if you post to me and get a notice telling you that I can't read your post, it means you are on my ignore list. I change the list on a semi-monthly basis, so you may want to save yourself time and space and just periodically check in, as obviously you are following all my post and threads with much interest.
^^^
Neo-Nazi fuckwit.
That’s what all the neo-nazi fuckwits and WSE supporters claim. They lie a lot just like you admitted yesterday.you're a disgusting and delusional idiot.
no wonder you're a dem.
That’s what all the neo-nazi fuckwits and WSE supporters claim. They lie a lot just like you admitted yesterday.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No stupid, I just didn't understand whether you wanted documentation or anecdotes.
Now, pay attention: I was wrong in my statement. Handguns used in mass shootings outnumber rifles in the last 30 years.
However,
One has to check the number of victims in each case, as law enforcement determines that just 2 or more victims warrant the mass shooting labels. Also, one has to remember what weapons used were on the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban list that sunset in 2004. Hope these following helps:
https://everytownresearch.org/maps/m...gs-in-america/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...on-types-used/
https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-...bill/4296/text
When have anecdotes ever been accepted as proof?
Lying idiot asshole.
Fuck off.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Note: if you post to me and get a notice telling you that I can't read your post, it means you are on my ignore list. I change the list on a semi-monthly basis, so you may want to save yourself time and space and just periodically check in, as obviously you are following all my post and threads with much interest.
Shut the fuck up you arrogant disingenuous faggot.
Again, you lying CUNT, WRONG.
You challenged Matt Dillon not me.
One stupid lie after another.
Please explain to the reading audience how you have revised the definition of "anecdote" to mean valid, documented facts from reliable sources, as my previous links show.
Bottom line: if you can't, that means all your subsequent bluff and bluster is just a lame attempt to avoid conceding a point.
As previously demonstrated, I have no problem acknowledging error on my part. But it seems you and your MAGA brethren can't muster the intellectual courage and honesty to do like wise. Not surprising. Carry on.
Oh put your skirt down, Melissa. It's a minor mistake. The chronology of the posts show You taking up the gauntlet for your equally deluded and possible drunk buddy. Being that you both have nearly identical reponse styles, it's easy to confuse you.
That being rectified, seems you fail to deal with evidence proving your blathering wrong on a few points....just like Matty, who earned another month on the ignore list. Carry on.
Seems old Rune was on a MAGA bender last night, folks. That explains his dumber than usual rant/response here. Sad, but not unexpected.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Please explain to the reading audience how you have revised the definition of "anecdote" to mean valid, documented facts from reliable sources, as my previous links show.
Bottom line: if you can't, that means all your subsequent bluff and bluster is just a lame attempt to avoid conceding a point.
As previously demonstrated, I have no problem acknowledging error on my part. But it seems you and your MAGA brethren can't muster the intellectual courage and honesty to do like wise. Not surprising. Carry on.
Anecdotal evidence bears no weight.
Shut the fuck up.
I am an actual Liberal, unlike you, liar.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Oh put your skirt down, Melissa. It's a minor mistake. The chronology of the posts show You taking up the gauntlet for your equally deluded and possible drunk buddy. Being that you both have nearly identical reponse styles, it's easy to confuse you.
That being rectified, seems you fail to deal with evidence proving your blathering wrong on a few points....just like Matty, who earned another month on the ignore list. Carry on.
Lies on top of lies
Okay, once more for the cheap seats: How is providing valid sourced, documented FACTS that contradict/disprove a declarative statement from you "anecdotal".
Look up the definition of "anecdotal", genius. Then post it so the readers can see it's from a valid source and not another lame brained "interpretation" from you. That way, we can apply it to the chronology of the posts, see your folly and move on.
Failure to comply coupled with more of your bluff and bluster just means you're a MAGA troll of limited intelligence. Hope you're at least getting paid scale. Carry on.
Stop bragging...everyone knows you're full of it. You'd rather do this crap than just debate the issue honestly, which may result in your being wrong.
You're done, doofus. See you in a month or so.
State police are not militia. The National Guard is a federal militia.