the AR-15 follies: Here we go again!

Why are you so upset about the comparison? Many people remember how the fucking Nazis butchered 6 Million Jews. What about the other 5 Million they butchered? Who gives a shit about them?

Not you. You're more like Stalin than Hitler. I prefer neither.

None I know. You?

That's not what you were previously claiming.

Now I’m like Stalin? :lolup:

Remember the Soup Nazi? “No soup for you!”

Think of me the same way. “No guns for you!”

:rofl2:
 
Hello Taichiliberal,



Guy musta thought he was living out some kind of movie.

Yep, right up to Jan. 6th, that cost a woman her life, along with a DC cop just doing his job. Now they get to live the part of the movie where the insurrectionists are hunted down and jailed...with the majority of Americans rooting for the cops. As the old saying goes, be careful what you wish for.
 
Now I’m like Stalin? :lolup:

Remember the Soup Nazi? “No soup for you!”

Think of me the same way. “No guns for you!”

:rofl2:

Umm...are you okay? You seem a bit irrational today. More than usual. Why do you think "more like" is equal to "like"? Is it a language thing? An ideological thing? A psychological thing? I'm genuinely curious.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Your last lengthy sentence is disingenuous at best. In 1994, the AWB included handguns https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/pub...lico Liberty


Those are not actually handguns, those are carbines/rifles that have short barrels and some had braces others not, if you knew your firearms you would have known that. in fact the shooter in Colorado used such a handgun, technically he did not use a rifle/carbine. When I say you are not going to ban handguns I mean the Millions of semiautos and revolvers that are actually used the most in most mass and every day shootings. That being the case, you have a big problem that we cannot solve until we actually deal with the problem, which is not firearms.

And there lies the rub.....when it's convenient the gunners would classify those weapons on the list as 'handguns', but once off the list they change their tune and have no problem as to how they are marketed by the retailers. Hell, some gunners are in denial or ignorant of what the AR-15 was originally designed for.And spare us all this tired mantra that guns are not the whole problem. Hell, the GOP fights to defund any social programs that would address proverty, treatment for mental health, etc. They bitch about "entitlements", yet turn a blind eye to the FACT that the desperate, the criminal and the emotional/mentally defecive will turn to weapons that make it easier for them to lash out or take advantage of society. The AR-15 was designed as a military weapon TO KILL PEOPLE. Its versatility, good trigger action and accuracy suits most well for the non-professional...and it's been the weapon of choice for the majority of mass shootings in the last 30 years or so (or a similar assault weapon that was on the 1994 AWB list). A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you accept it or not.
 
And there lies the rub.....when it's convenient the gunners would classify those weapons on the list as 'handguns', but once off the list they change their tune and have no problem as to how they are marketed by the retailers. Hell, some gunners are in denial or ignorant of what the AR-15 was originally designed for.And spare us all this tired mantra that guns are not the whole problem. Hell, the GOP fights to defund any social programs that would address proverty, treatment for mental health, etc. They bitch about "entitlements", yet turn a blind eye to the FACT that the desperate, the criminal and the emotional/mentally defecive will turn to weapons that make it easier for them to lash out or take advantage of society. The AR-15 was designed as a military weapon TO KILL PEOPLE. Its versatility, good trigger action and accuracy suits most well for the non-professional...and it's been the weapon of choice for the majority of mass shootings in the last 30 years or so (or a similar assault weapon that was on the 1994 AWB list). A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you accept it or not.


You need to do more research, the weapon of choice for mass shootings is a handgun, I have posted links showing just that. It is that when someone uses an AR everyone makes a big deal out of the firearm used. Funny how that was Not the case in the shooting in Georgia the week before when the shooter killed 8 people with a handgun. You probably mean well, but before wading into this topic too deep you should do some more reading and learn more about the topic.
 
Yep, right up to Jan. 6th, that cost a woman her life, along with a DC cop just doing his job. Now they get to live the part of the movie where the insurrectionists are hunted down and jailed...with the majority of Americans rooting for the cops. As the old saying goes, be careful what you wish for.

Data is showing up that most Qanon followers were nutjobs. Why don't Democrats care about mental health care over gun suicides?

https://theconversation.com/many-qanon-followers-report-having-mental-health-diagnoses-157299
many QAnon followers revealed – in their own words on social media or in interviews – a wide range of mental health diagnoses, including bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety and addiction.

In court records of QAnon followers arrested in the wake of the Capitol insurrection, 68% reported they had received mental health diagnoses. The conditions they revealed included post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, paranoid schizophrenia and Munchausen syndrome by proxy – a psychological disorder that causes one to invent or inflict health problems on a loved one, usually a child, in order to gain attention for themselves. By contrast, 19% of all Americans have a mental health diagnosis.

Among QAnon insurrectionists with criminal records, 44% experienced a serious psychological trauma that preceded their radicalization, such as physical or sexual abuse of them or of their children.
 
Okay, so we all know that Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa went postal in Boulder, CO grocery store this pas Monday. He killed a bunch of people before getting shot by the cops and surrendering. So far, the cops are saying it doesn't look like a American got "radicalized" by Islamic extremism. Instead, according to family and friends, the guy seems to be 1 brick shy of a load. The kicker is just 4 days before junior went off the very ban on the weapon he used was over turned by the district courts.

Now on one end you have the gun control folk and Democratic majority banging the table saying, "See! Get these damned things (assault weapons, i.e. the AR-15 type rifles) out of general population circulation! Ban them! "

On the other end you have the 2nd Amendment folk and Republican majority banging the table saying, "See! Muslim extremists/terrorists are here! It's not the guns, it's them!"

My take is this: If junior had no criminal record or official record of psychological problems, a 7 day waiting period for a background check wouldn't have made a difference. He would have every legal right under Colorado law to buy that weapon. You can only go far in trying to legislate against crazy.

BUT

Once again, the weapon of choice for mass shooters is the AR-15....a sweet little versatile weapon that does EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED FOR....ASSAULTING AND KILLING PEOPLE WITH ACCURACY (as much as the user can apply). Now people will debate until doomsday as to whether the same amount of damage could have been done with other types of rifles or a handgun (or handguns).

BUT

We will NEVER know if the AR-15 is available to ANYONE, ANY TIME, ANY WHERE.

And the band played on. :|

Sometimes a waiting period will allow people time to change their minds. He might have gotten laid that week or won a lotto.
 
Oom, what is your obsession with suicide?

Don't people know when they've had enough?

Have you ever heard about valuing life in qualitative rather than absolute terms?
That's why I believe in humane euthanasia instead of lengthy prison sentences.

Life isn't always good, Oom.
To many, it's more imposition than gift.



Sorry, but I really don't get what you're going on about.
 
Proves my continuing point that too many weapons are too easily available to too many people that should never have them. And the gun huggers’ response is “more guns”.

What do you think a social media check finds? When my neighbor was undergoing a background check for federal security purposes, they interviewed every neighbor.

yep, jobs like HS, FBI, NSA, ATF ... all applicants family and friends get that knock on the door. Gun background checks don't go that far.
 
Define "military type assault weapons" since the only military weapons I have are bolt action rifles and one semi-automatic pistol. The rest are all civilian manufacture for the civilian market.

Thanks for confirming you want to ban guns.....just not all guns.....yet. :)

I don't know. Ask a fucking teabagger.

The AR-15 was DESIGNED AS A MILITARY ASSAULT WEAPON. A matter of fact, a matter of history that gunners just refuse to accept.
 
The AR-15 was DESIGNED AS A MILITARY ASSAULT WEAPON. A matter of fact, a matter of history that gunners just refuse to accept.

So? It's not one. It's a civilian semi-automatic rifle. Are you upset because it's semi-automatic or because of its history? It's "genetics" so to speak?
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
That first sentence is the most repeated disingenuous line promoted by the gun lobby and anti-gov't, anti (anything they perceive as) liberal types and right wing media punditry. I say this because on one hand you have all these civilian/armchair weapons experts swearing that the anti-gun folk put too credit on the AR-15, as there are plenty more weapons better suited for hunting, mass shooting, etc.

But, when it's pointed out that the AR-15 is extremely popular, and the weapon of choice for the majority of mass shooters and anti-gov't protest yahoos (who can be spotted strapped with them at their protests and rallies sometimes), the response is "well, those deaths are statistically minuscule, so I'd take the risk rather than you take my gun".

That's f***ing sick in my book...pure sociopathic thinking. Or if you like, arrested development .... an adult telling a child they can't have that particular toy as it poses a danger to other children, point to a plethora of similar type toys, and the child throws a tantrum, NO, I WANT THAT ONE BECAUSE I WANT IT!

Your second sentence is also disingenuous, as the Dems have put forth various bills that would incorporate mental illness tags in a universal background check system...only to be shot down by the GOP and kept as a state by state mish mosh



Nice rant, but disagreed for the reasons discussed on this thread and the "Democrats Don't Care" thread.

BTW, claiming someone is disingenuous just because they disagree and explain why they disagree seems to be the new Democratic "big lie". I guess they have to make up for four years of Trump lies, eh? LOL

Your first sentence just trys to blow smoke and fails. If you can't logically or factually address the points I made, don't try to dodge with some generalize reference to another thread. Specifics, Dutch, specifics. A link, a quote or original response here will do. Other wise, man up and concede a point.

Your second sentence is just more smoke from you. I was VERY SPECIFIC in pointing out why you essentially were wrong. That you have no logical or rational defense and fall back on this lame ass Rush Limbaugh/Sean Hannity/Candace Owens/Mike Levine clap trap is pathetic. Your "guess" work is wrong, as any objective reader can see. Carry on.
 
that's the best you've got? No concede to the point, just a picayune bitching? Jeez Dutch, you're slipp'in!

If you would provide some facts about crime dropping after 9/11, but that's not what I was referencing when I said it could easily take 30 minutes for a response to a 911 call where I live.

Why would you want to see my wife defenseless against attackers? Or anyone else? Why are you so cruel and heartless to leave women defenseless just because they don't live in the city with an honest police officer on every street corner waiting to help them?
 
Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
How many of those "gun deaths" are suicides? 2/3s? Not that Democrats care. LOL

Over 48,000 Americans commit suicide every year, but Democrats don't care except for the 24,000 that used a gun. Want to guess how many shots are fired in a suicide or the type of weapon used?

How many Democrats are stupid enough to think banning semi-automatic rifles and pistols or high capacity magazines would change that suicide rate?

https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/stat.../suicide.shtml
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WISQARS Leading Causes of Death Reports, in 2018:
Suicide was the tenth leading cause of death overall in the United States, claiming the lives of over 48,000 people.
Suicide was the second leading cause of death among individuals between the ages of 10 and 34, and the fourth leading cause of death among individuals between the ages of 35 and 54.
There were more than two and a half times as many suicides (48,344) in the United States as there were homicides (18,830).




A suicide IS a gun death, pally boy. Ever seen one? They look just like most other gun deaths.

Who said certain gun bans would prevent all suicides. Jethro? Certainly not me.

But the ease of access to guns by people who should not have them is a contributing factir.

Next.

what's really sick is that gunners are essentially telling Americans, "So what if some yahoos kill 10 or more people at a clip? It's less than suicide by guns, so buck up and take the risk because it hasn't happend to me or mine, and even if I don't own one, that weapons shouldn't be taken off the shelves just beause it bothers my mental comfort zone".

:palm: god damned sick socipathic clods.....the gun manufacturers/retailers make money, the politicians that take their money get re-elected, and another mass shooting is just around the corner. God indeed bless America, because we need all the help we can get!
 
what's really sick is that gunners are essentially telling Americans, "So what if some yahoos kill 10 or more people at a clip? It's less than suicide by guns, so buck up and take the risk because it hasn't happend to me or mine, and even if I don't own one, that weapons shouldn't be taken off the shelves just beause it bothers my mental comfort zone".

:palm: god damned sick socipathic clods.....the gun manufacturers/retailers make money, the politicians that take their money get re-elected, and another mass shooting is just around the corner. God indeed bless America, because we need all the help we can get!

That's one view point.

Another viewpoint is a dystopian society like THX 1138 where everything is same and controlled "for the children".

53br6d.gif
 
Which is one reason why the Republican Party and me parted ways. I wanted best for America's children and they became focused upon protecting their own children to the detriment of all others.

Skinner wasn't a proponent of forcing people to do anything. He just proved how we're all animals to an extent.

Have you ever read Isaac Asimov's Foundation series?

Skinner didn’t appear forceful, but I concluded he was playing with the human mind in my brief exposure with his work.

I read I, Robot in junior high school, but I was much more into the books of J Krishnamurti, “Think on These Things” and “The Awakening of Intelligence” .. changed my life at an early age.
 
Back
Top