the AR-15 follies: Here we go again!

Okay, so we all know that Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa went postal in Boulder, CO grocery store this pas Monday. He killed a bunch of people before getting shot by the cops and surrendering. So far, the cops are saying it doesn't look like a American got "radicalized" by Islamic extremism. Instead, according to family and friends, the guy seems to be 1 brick shy of a load. The kicker is just 4 days before junior went off the very ban on the weapon he used was over turned by the district courts.

Now on one end you have the gun control folk and Democratic majority banging the table saying, "See! Get these damned things (assault weapons, i.e. the AR-15 type rifles) out of general population circulation! Ban them! "

On the other end you have the 2nd Amendment folk and Republican majority banging the table saying, "See! Muslim extremists/terrorists are here! It's not the guns, it's them!"

My take is this: If junior had no criminal record or official record of psychological problems, a 7 day waiting period for a background check wouldn't have made a difference. He would have every legal right under Colorado law to buy that weapon. You can only go far in trying to legislate against crazy.

BUT

Once again, the weapon of choice for mass shooters is the AR-15....a sweet little versatile weapon that does EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED FOR....ASSAULTING AND KILLING PEOPLE WITH ACCURACY (as much as the user can apply). Now people will debate until doomsday as to whether the same amount of damage could have been done with other types of rifles or a handgun (or handguns).

BUT

We will NEVER know if the AR-15 is available to ANYONE, ANY TIME, ANY WHERE.

And the band played on. :|

Guns don't kill people. People kill people.
 
Stop lying, toodles. The objective reader can follow the chronology of the posts and see how I systematically dismantle all your assertions and allegations...You keep braying about "education" yet you have consistently displayed willful ignorance as to the very creation of the AR-15, the contents of the 1994 AWB. As for the tragedies caused by this weapon being on the shelves of retailers, your croccodile tears are a joke, because you are making excuses to keep things just as they are...which means more yahoos and nut jobs will have access to a WEAPON OF CHOICE to do their evil.

Your actions and mentality lead to a conclusion that doesn't paint you in a good light. TFB if you don't like it, but don't throw a hissy fit at me....it's your words and beliefs. The OP just brought it out in you. Yeah, I'll tell you over and over, because like a good little monkey, you see/hear/speak no evil against the gun manufacturers/retailers/NRA.
Carry on.

Americans should have full access to full-autos and suppressors, you NaziMarxist fuck!
 
I'm talking reality of the present and you're countering with "what if" using a sci-fi movie as your concrete basis? You gun flunkies seem to embrace the concept of "alternative facts".

:rolleyes: You're living up to your icon description, Dutch.

Since you can't tell the difference between a 911 for help and the 9/11 terrorist attack, it doesn't surprise me you are confused about other things too.

translation: Dutch lives up to his icon description by pushing his opinion as fact and desperately trying to change the subject with various accusations. Pity the fool doesn't understand that the chronology of the posts will always expose his folly....his insipidly stubborn denial non-withstanding.

laugh, clown, laugh.
QED
 
Who you gonna send to take them if they're banned?

May I introduce you to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

ATF is a law enforcement agency in the United States’ Department of Justice that protects our communities from violent criminals, criminal organizations, the illegal ownership, use, and trafficking of firearms, the illegal use and storage of explosives, acts of arson and bombings, acts of terrorism, and the illegal diversion of alcohol and tobacco products. They partner with communities, industries, law enforcement, and public safety agencies to safeguard the public they serve through information sharing, training, research, and use of technology. They take illegal guns away from people everyday of the week!

HELLO ATF SWAT......

atf.jpg
 
Last edited:
May I introduce you to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

ATF is a law enforcement agency in the United States’ Department of Justice that protects our communities from violent criminals, criminal organizations, the illegal use and trafficking of firearms, the illegal use and storage of explosives, acts of arson and bombings, acts of terrorism, and the illegal diversion of alcohol and tobacco products. They partner with communities, industries, law enforcement, and public safety agencies to safeguard the public we serve through information sharing, training, research, and use of technology.

HELLO ATF SWAT......

https://denver.cbslocal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/15909806/2012/05/atf.jpg?w=1024&h=576&crop=1
Hey! I remember those guys! They've been in the news a few times. :)

53ceb0.gif
 
May I introduce you to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

ATF is a law enforcement agency in the United States’ Department of Justice that protects our communities from violent criminals, criminal organizations, the illegal ownership, use, and trafficking of firearms, the illegal use and storage of explosives, acts of arson and bombings, acts of terrorism, and the illegal diversion of alcohol and tobacco products. They partner with communities, industries, law enforcement, and public safety agencies to safeguard the public they serve through information sharing, training, research, and use of technology.

HELLO ATF SWAT......

atf.jpg

They would be out numbered and out gunned in a big way in my neck of the woods and the State of Texas would take very unkindly to Feds searching homes to take away everyone's firearms, just the reality. The ATF can with a warrant go into a persons home and arrest them and take whatever firearms are there on an individual basis, but a large scale operation would get them into very deep water. Some States might submit, but I can assure that some would not, and something no one wants would become very real, very quickly.
 
Hey! I remember those guys! They've been in the news a few times. :)

53ceb0.gif

Think about them trying that State Wide....We would revert to the Republic of Texas within 24 hours and probably take several neighboring States with us. No, I do not think even the Feds are that stupid, but then again they do stupid things like Waco so who knows.
 
Think about them trying that State Wide....We would revert to the Republic of Texas within 24 hours and probably take several neighboring States with us. No, I do not think even the Feds are that stupid, but then again they do stupid things like Waco so who knows.

LOL. A few states might join us. :)
 
May I introduce you to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

ATF is a law enforcement agency in the United States’ Department of Justice that protects our communities from violent criminals, criminal organizations, the illegal ownership, use, and trafficking of firearms, the illegal use and storage of explosives, acts of arson and bombings, acts of terrorism, and the illegal diversion of alcohol and tobacco products. They partner with communities, industries, law enforcement, and public safety agencies to safeguard the public they serve through information sharing, training, research, and use of technology. They take illegal guns away from people everyday of the week!

HELLO ATF SWAT......

atf.jpg

They send in a whole platoon after one individual. Do you think they have enough resources to send in a platoon at each household that might have firearms they don't like?
They know what they're up against, and it ain't just one individual. It's gonna be a whole lot of pissed off citizens. After a few confrontations, they'll get the message.
 
Actually, they can. My wife is an example of that. She has a genetic condition that causes her hands to shake enough that her writing is illegible. She can barely type on a keyboard. Social Security decided she was "disabled" because of this as she could neither write or type, or do most other things requiring precision use of your hands. So, she got SSI because she couldn't write a check--not that we really needed the cash, but whatever...

"She has a genetic condition that causes her hands to shake enough that her writing is illegible. She can barely type on a keyboard".

Then by all means, give her an AR.

The regulation was for the mentally unfit to write a check or possibly know what a check is or for.
 
an inability to do certain things that others can is not a sign that someone is nuts. If that were true, YOU should be committed because you can't think straight

Evidently you fit that bill, cant comprehend or think straight.

"The NRA insisted the Obama rule infringed on Second Amendment rights to buy guns, even though the regulation specifically targeted people who were diagnosed with mental illness".
 
Define "military type assault weapons" since the only military weapons I have are bolt action rifles and one semi-automatic pistol. The rest are all civilian manufacture for the civilian market.

Thanks for confirming you want to ban guns.....just not all guns.....yet. :)

I don't know. Ask a fucking teabagger.

Bolt action are fine, it the semi-automatics that can hold 30 rounds or more in a magazine and can fire all of them in under 30 seconds.
Why do civilians need that type of weapon?

"Thanks for confirming you want to ban guns.....just not all guns.....yet".

Never said that, now you're talking like a teabagger (wwwteaparty.org)

Is calling in a bomb threat a violation of free speech?
 
Bolt action are fine, it the semi-automatics that can hold 30 rounds or more in a magazine and can fire all of them in under 30 seconds.
Why do civilians need that type of weapon?


"Thanks for confirming you want to ban guns.....just not all guns.....yet".

Never said that, now you're talking like a teabagger (wwwteaparty.org)

Is calling in a bomb threat a violation of free speech?

Attention Fuckwit: The Second Amendment is about being able to kill people.
 
Bolt action are fine, it the semi-automatics that can hold 30 rounds or more in a magazine and can fire all of them in under 30 seconds.
Why do civilians need that type of weapon?

"Thanks for confirming you want to ban guns.....just not all guns.....yet".

Never said that, now you're talking like a teabagger (wwwteaparty.org)

Is calling in a bomb threat a violation of free speech?

WTF does "calling in a bomb threat" have to do with Biden & Co. wanting to ban a few of my firearms?
You off on a tangent again or just "off" ?
 
It has nothing to do with it, noworries is just a fucktard.

I thought he was just a fuckwit. Did he graduate to full on fucktard?
That's gonna piss off Colonel fuckwit, he's gonna lose one of his "troops" LOL!
 
WTF does "calling in a bomb threat" have to do with Biden & Co. wanting to ban a few of my firearms?
You off on a tangent again or just "off" ?

ONE aspect of free speech. Right?

Biden wanting to ban a few of your weapons but not ALL your weapons.
 
I thought he was just a fuckwit. Did he graduate to full on fucktard?
That's gonna piss off Colonel fuckwit, he's gonna lose one of his "troops" LOL!

Sure beats graduating from Trump U. special ed correspondence course.

Who "gradiated" higher?


You or the other retard, that STILL hasn't realized he's on my troll list.
 
ONE aspect of free speech. Right?

Biden wanting to ban a few of your weapons but not ALL your weapons.

Giving up a few will lead to giving them all up. That ain't gonna happen. Period.
I sure as hell ain't giving up anything that isn't hurting anyone. That includes my "military issued" weapons.
 
Back
Top