The Christ Haters Are At It Again Folks.

Jefferson shall give account for his testimonies concerning The Lord Jesus Christ;just like every person shall be responsible for their personal testimony of The Lord Jesus Christ :Jesus is The Word of God. if you hate the word of God, you hate The Lord Jesus Christ.. make the tree good... v. 33---- http://biblehub.com/kjv/matthew/12.htm, do not forget to study the context before, after, and the common thread of all scripture. Jesus is The Lord.


Jefferson said the authors of the New Testament were ignorant and unlettered men. Agreed. I'll go one step further and make the claim that the believers of those children's stories are the same.
 
Did Mommy skip science when you were home schooled, Rufus? Chemistry, physics, biology, microbiology, genetics, archeology, astronomy, etc. You demonstrate an enormous ignorance of all.

Maybe you're unaware of it, but physics, astronomy, genetics etc don't explain origins.

For example, the origin of biological information isn't explicable in terms of organic chemistry. How do you get from a world without DNA to a world with functionally integrated living systems that are dependent on the information contained in DNA?

There's no explanation for it based on current knowledge. Which means you are as ignorant as anyone.
 
Stupid fuck. I'm the one pointing out your children's stories. You and Ralphie still take them as fact.

I accept them......as you accept your beliefs in evolution as the origin of species and the spontaneous eruption of life out of a muddy puddle......you're hardly on solid ground to call anyone a stupid fuck for doing exactly what you do.....
 
Your children's book says what it says. One boat. 2x of all animals. 40 days and 40 nights of rain. Loaded in 24 hours.

That's your book. Now you're saying it's horseshit? Good. Now we're on the same page.

its a legend, madmax.......are you ready to admit that your beliefs about humans sharing a common ancestor with lice are even less than that?.....
 
Did Mommy skip science when you were home schooled, Rufus? Chemistry, physics, biology, microbiology, genetics, archeology, astronomy, etc. You demonstrate an enormous ignorance of all.

so, since you're a brilliant biologist perhaps you can tell me.......did a butterfly evolve from a crawling creature or a flying creature and why did it stop halfway through......
 
Maybe you're unaware of it, but physics, astronomy, genetics etc don't explain origins.

For example, the origin of biological information isn't explicable in terms of organic chemistry. How do you get from a world without DNA to a world with functionally integrated living systems that are dependent on the information contained in DNA?

There's no explanation for it based on current knowledge. Which means you are as ignorant as anyone.
I think the real issue is how to go about exploring the universe.

This is exciting, because we DON'T have all the answers. Why would it be interesting if the answers were already known?

And, there is no chance of that, because we're human. For every piece of knowledge we gain we end up with MORE questions, not fewer.

So, man created science as a way of gaining more and more knowledge in an organized way - and in a way that is self correcting, because we know for certain that mistakes will be made.

Calling that "ignorance" makes no sense. It's simply mankind finding the best way possible to investigate how things work.

Of course, that doesn't answer any question of "why". Why is there an earth? Well, science isn't designed to figure that out.
 
Maybe you're unaware of it, but physics, astronomy, genetics etc don't explain origins.

For example, the origin of biological information isn't explicable in terms of organic chemistry. How do you get from a world without DNA to a world with functionally integrated living systems that are dependent on the information contained in DNA?

There's no explanation for it based on current knowledge. Which means you are as ignorant as anyone.

Just fucking hilarious.

Because science has no definitive answer (yet), you hang your hat on a big sky daddy.
 
I accept them......as you accept your beliefs in evolution as the origin of species and the spontaneous eruption of life out of a muddy puddle......you're hardly on solid ground to call anyone a stupid fuck for doing exactly what you do.....

Spontaneous eruption from muddy puddles? (laughing)

You got that from one of your creationist sites, didn't you?
 
Spontaneous eruption from muddy puddles? (laughing)

You got that from one of your creationist sites, didn't you?

no....from an atheist......do you have a different theory of the origin of life......perhaps you believe it evolved from a package of Oreo cookies......
 
Jefferson said the authors of the New Testament were ignorant and unlettered men. Agreed. I'll go one step further and make the claim that the believers of those children's stories are the same.

Where did Jefferson say that??
 
I think the real issue is how to go about exploring the universe.

This is exciting, because we DON'T have all the answers. Why would it be interesting if the answers were already known?

And, there is no chance of that, because we're human. For every piece of knowledge we gain we end up with MORE questions, not fewer.

So, man created science as a way of gaining more and more knowledge in an organized way - and in a way that is self correcting, because we know for certain that mistakes will be made.

Calling that "ignorance" makes no sense. It's simply mankind finding the best way possible to investigate how things work.

Of course, that doesn't answer any question of "why". Why is there an earth? Well, science isn't designed to figure that out.

True enough.

'Ignorant' isn't necessarily a pejorative. It only means lack of knowledge; and our knowledge of origins is borderline totally incomplete.

There are hypotheses of course, but these shouldn't be confused with knowledge.
 
Back
Top