I am willing to consider engaging you again if I assume your days of gossip and innuendo under the Anonymous handle is water under the bridge.
I understand everyone has their own personal definition of what a “true conservative” is, and that includes the opinions of William Buckley, Phyllis Schlafly, as well as obscure message board posters.
I have learned more about the conservative tradition from Professor Allitt in ten lectures, than I have in ten years from message board conservatives. The only philosophy most self-proclaimed message board conservatives have is a nihilistic hatred of anything perceived as liberal, and an unfounded slavish devotion to the Iraq War. The Iraq War is actually the only tangible policy I ever noticed message board conservatives passionately supporting and defending nearly in unison.
As a matter of philosophical tradition, being conservative does not mean supporting NAFTA, supporting Bush’s Tax Cuts for the Rich, or supporting Trump’s Muslim ban. Being conservative in the Anglo-American convention means being a traditionalist, believing in the accumulated wisdom of the past, believing in the traditional social order, believing in incremental change at best, and having an overt suspicion if not outright hostility towards democratic institutions.
And that broad contextual backdrop of the conservative tradition has plenty of room for William Buckely, Ayn Rand, Edmund Burke, John Adams, bible thumping social conservatives, war mongering neoconservatives, white Christian nationalists, among others. No one actually has a claim on what a "true conservative" is.