The Coronavirus is exploding almost exclusively in red states

Concart

Well-known member
Contributor
Based on new cases per million, here are the states with more than 300 per million population:

Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida.

That's it folks. 12 states with new cases totaling more than 300 per million population. Exactly ONE of those states was won by Clinton in 2016 (Nevada, where she was actually behind in the last polls)

This spike in coronavirus cases corresponds geographically with a red state map. Of course. Because the governors of those states blew through CDC guidelines for re-opening in service of the moron in the Oval Office. Good luck in November, Death Cult.

https://covidtracking.com/data/charts/us-daily-positive-cases
 
Here we are with a deadly pandemic, and Trump is trying to win re-election by saving the Confederate flag and digging dirt on Biden, no wonder Trump is sinking in the polls,

Trump doesn't want to be 'distracted' by the pandemic adviser, he tells WAPO

The Washington Post is out with a new report quoting a Trump adviser who says the president has turned his attention away from the coronavirus pandemic.

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-doesnt-want-distracted-pandemic-032026003.html
 
So, you think Florida is slight compared to what happened in New York?

Florida had more cases in a single day than New York ever had in a single day. And now it's day after day after day of cases over 10,000. At the current rate, Florida will surpass New York for total cases in the next ten days.
 
Florida had more cases in a single day than New York ever had in a single day. And now it's day after day after day of cases over 10,000. At the current rate, Florida will surpass New York for total cases in the next ten days.

Sad but true, and Florida had the time to have prevented it, unlike New York.
 
except dems are the social darwinists. conservatives believe god loves even the inferior.

That's what the say, but the more you listen to them talk, you start to see that what they really believe is the poor should die out.
Liberals believe in taking care of the poor and weak, which is literally the opposite of Social Darwinism. And yes, I'm aware of the further irony that many Conservatives are Social Darwinists but don't believe in evolution.
 
That's what the say, but the more you listen to them talk, you start to see that what they really believe is the poor should die out.
Liberals believe in taking care of the poor and weak, which is literally the opposite of Social Darwinism. And yes, I'm aware of the further irony that many Conservatives are Social Darwinists but don't believe in evolution.

I see dems talking about eliminating people more often.
 
how about aborted babies? just for starters.

Liberals generally don't believe that life begins at conception. Now if you disagree with when life begins, alright, but that's a different topic. The point is that pro-choice people don't believe abortion is murder. This also isn't Social Darwinism because nobody is arguing that abortion rights should ONLY be for weak babies, like the Nazis had.

On the other hand, Conservatives know that when a poor person dies because they can't afford health care, that actually is death. And they see that as good.
 
Liberals generally don't believe that life begins at contraception. Now if you disagree with when life begins, alright, but that's a different topic. The point is that pro-choice people don't believe abortion is murder. This also isn't Social Darwinism because nobody is arguing that abortion rights should ONLY be for weak babies, like the Nazis had.

On the other hand, Conservatives know that when a poor person dies because they can't afford health care, that actually is death. And they see that as good.

life begins at conception, not contraception. and thats science. now who's feels over reals?

and margaret sanger, founder of planned parenthood, was a eugenicist who was very anti negro.

black lives matter.
 
Last edited:
life begins at conception, not contraception. and thats science. now who's feels over reals?

Blasted autocorrect!

But no, it's not that simple. At conception, the fetus is no different than a sperm. If we're going to say life begins at conception, then every time you cum, you're committing mass murder.
 
Based on new cases per million, here are the states with more than 300 per million population:

Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida.

That's it folks. 12 states with new cases totaling more than 300 per million population. Exactly ONE of those states was won by Clinton in 2016 (Nevada, where she was actually behind in the last polls)

This spike in coronavirus cases corresponds geographically with a red state map. Of course. Because the governors of those states blew through CDC guidelines for re-opening in service of the moron in the Oval Office. Good luck in November, Death Cult.

https://covidtracking.com/data/charts/us-daily-positive-cases

Breaking News

The coronavirus targets red states.
 
Blasted autocorrect!

But no, it's not that simple. At conception, the fetus is no different than a sperm. If we're going to say life begins at conception, then every time you cum, you're committing mass murder.

its totally different than a sperm. you're ignorant.

diploid versus Haploid comparison chart; Diploid Haploid; About: Diploid cells contain two complete sets (2n) of chromosomes. Haploid cells have half the number of chromosomes (n) as diploid - i.e. a haploid cell contains only one complete set of chromosomes.
 
its totally different than a sperm. you're ignorant.

diploid versus Haploid comparison chart; Diploid Haploid; About: Diploid cells contain two complete sets (2n) of chromosomes. Haploid cells have half the number of chromosomes (n) as diploid - i.e. a haploid cell contains only one complete set of chromosomes.

Not really. The consciousness is pretty much exactly like a sperm. Real brain activity, like the kind we see even in insects, doesn't begin until week eight. So if it's immoral to kill a fetus seconds after conception, it doesn't make any sense to say it's not immoral to cum.

Anyway, this is beside the topic because it doesn't have anything to do with Social Darwinism.
 
Back
Top