The Coronavirus is exploding almost exclusively in red states
- Thread starter Concart
- Start date
New York took care of it. Reds are not going to do that. Deaths are the cost of purity.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
is that why you kill babies? their innocence?
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
And *that* is what makes what the (R) governors and their Covidiot-in-Chief totally culpable in the morbidity and mortality in the last two months. They KNEW -- and did nothing.
Opening up businesses too soon and also schools is a fine way to eliminate people. That is what Trump and Trumpians want. Reds do not care about the masses.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
kay:
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
im fine with ivf. I have to get back to you on rape zygotes.
I see, so eggs fertilized outside the womb are not human. Your massive hypocrisy completely invalidates your position. Thanks for playing.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
what other species would they be?
But you are fine killing them. That makes you a massive hypocrite, and your position completely devoid of logic.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
this is why you're losing.
Because you are hysterically emotional? LOL at you.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
that must be it.
Cancel 2020.2
Canceled
A much stronger correlation is with regard to climate. Almost all of the states with rising rates are warmer in climate. The cooler states have lower rates.
Another correlation has to do with when each state first started getting significant numbers of cases. In the beginning, the Northeast was hit hardest by COVID, particularly in New York and New Jersey. After a few months, the virus spread southward.
Originally, the assumption was that warmer weather would contribute to a lessening of the spread, but it seems like the opposite might be true.
COVID doesn't care about your politics, but something that is likely contributing to the spread is people gathering outside more. Generally speaking, the hotter it gets outside, the more people get out and congregate. Also, the early period of isolation that was started throughout the country during spring has probably lead to a lot of people taking more risks by now, because they're sick of isolating. This probably wasn't as much of a problem for the cooler states, since COVID hit them hardest earlier, while people didn't yet have isolation fatigue.
Since the spread really hit the South later, this coincides with increased activity due to warmer weather.
There aren't many social darwinists in the South, or really anywhere in the U.S. Neither party is serious about shrinking entitlements, and neither party's base refrains from using them.
No, it's about making sure that people don't become dependent on the state. Plenty of conservatives are fine with having some entitlements, but the concern is with regard to people who only want to live off of the system.
The goal should be to help people temporarily and provide them a means by which they can then support themselves (like job training and such).
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
It is temporary.
While I am pro-choice, this is incorrect. At conception, you have a fertilized egg, which is quite different from a sperm. Now, you could say that both a sperm and an unfertilized egg are living matter.
That depends on the state and various other factors. There are discrete limits to things like federal assistance, but even those can be extended through certain means.