The democrat party has a new delaying tactic

It would take cooperation from Flake or one of the other moderates. So unless Trump chose someone one of those guys wanted, I doubt it.

Do you have anything but your massive and foolish beliefs to back up Flake will not support this candidate? Even the good Senator from Maine will support him. There is no there, there bufoon.
 
hmmm....wonder what Kav's beautiful Stepford wife and adorable bot-like children think of Daddy's lust for rape?

fun for the whole family!!!!

Just when you think liberal dumbfucks can't get any lower, you prove that there is no bottom to the depth of their hatred and depravity. But don't stop; everyone needs to see this kind of lunacy on display.

giphy.gif
 
Right. She came forward after the letter was released.

Bullshit lies. She's testifying under oath on Monday. All you do is lie. Lie, lie, lie. No compunction about it.

That's cool, though, because we'll get the satisfaction when you delete this pro-Trump account, create a brand new one to re-brand yourself, but because you lack an attention to detail and are just generally sloppy, you'll end up posting in the same style you post here. Then everyone will know what a phony, posturing fraud you are.

As of this morning, the Senate has received no confirmation of her attendance snowflake. Get your head out of your ass and get some much needed oxygen to that tiny brain of yours.
 
btw has Kav worked those 12 steps for his little problem?

fuckin drunk's running around trying to rape women.....thank god he's always plastered!
 
She has accepted, liar.

She will testify on Monday.

Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey Ford to testify on assault allegations in public Monday
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/17/politics/brett-kavanaugh-testimony/index.html

Why do you have to lie about everything? Like, you lie about every single detail.

That's some serious mental issues. If you can't tell the difference between lying and the truth anymore, then you should just kill yourself since you probably will anyway.

:lolup:Moron alert!! :rofl2:
 
So let’s see. We went from an anonymous accuser to a named accuser who said she wants to come forward and tell her story

Well the Republican Senate is giving her that opportunity. As of this posting she has not accepted

Now today we have Richard Blumenthal and Kamala Harris saying that the FBI needs to investigate BEFORE they can have a hearing

These fuckers are so stupid that they don’t even understand the concept of jurisdiction. The FBI doesn’t have jurisdiction to investigate this. It would be a local crime if one was committed at all

They are proving this is nothing more than a delaying tactic.

I agree that it is a delaying tactic, however, I do not agree that there is nothing more to it.

And you know as much as I do, that the FBI is responsible for doing character, as well as legal background checks on Justice appointees.

The only precedent any of us have in this, is the 1991 approval process of Clarence Thomas, where the Republicans basically put Anita Harris on trial and used the same old Male Chauvinistic character assassinations of women in general and made her out to be a whore by a panel of only male chauvinists.

So, what is happening right now is a repeat of history, that is going to be played out before the court of public opinion, as some of the same old male chauvinists like Orr will be exposing themselves once again as male chauvinists at a time when women will be a part of the interrogation process of the potential Justice and the victim.

And trust me, the whole Anita Harris hearing will be played back for a new generation of women to see how she was mistreated and denigrated by the Republicans the last time.

So most women voters will see how women are really treated by Republicans for all to see, judge for themselves, and vote accordingly in the next election.

So basically, not only is it a delaying tactic, it is also an eye-opener optic-event tactic for women voters to witness!

Now, let's just all relax, grab some popcorn, and watch history being made 2018 style!

Kamala Harris to the rescue! LOL!
 
Last edited:
I agree that it is a delaying tactic, however, I do not agree that there is nothing more to it.

And you know as much as I do, that the FBI is responsible for doing character, as well as legal background checks on Justice appointees.

The only precedent any of us have in this, is the 1991 approval process of Clarence Thomas, where the Republicans basically put Anita Harris on trial and used the same old Male Chauvinistic character assassinations of women in general and made her out to be a whore by a panel of only male chauvinists.

So, what is happening right now is a repeat of history, that is going to be played out before the court of public opinion, as some of the same old male chauvinists like Orr will be exposing themselves once again as male chauvinists at a time when women will be a part of the interrogation process of the potential Justice and the victim.

And trust me, the whole Anita Harris hearing will be played back for a new generation of women to see how she was mistreated and denigrated by the Republicans the last time.

So most women voters will see how women are really treated by Republicans for all to see, judge for themselves, and vote accordingly in the next election.

So basically, not only is it a delaying tactic, it is also an eye-opener optic-event tactic for women voters to witness!

Now, let's just all relax, grab some popcorn, and watch history being made 2018 style!

it cant be a legal matter as the statute limitations may have run out.
 
wut. Its supposed to be for rape right? attempted or something? there is definetly a statute of limitations for that. The fbi cant just investigate at random.

Because this is not a federal crime, the FBI will not investigate. Don't argue with idiots; they only drag you down to their level.
 
PROVE IT, YOUR OPINION MEANS NOTHING

Senator Grassley stated as much this morning on the radio; invitation to speak went out. As of this morning, no response from her or her attorney. Probably being coached by the Democratic Party of the Jackass what the next moronic move will be. ;)
 
So let’s see. We went from an anonymous accuser to a named accuser who said she wants to come forward and tell her story

Well the Republican Senate is giving her that opportunity. As of this posting she has not accepted

Now today we have Richard Blumenthal and Kamala Harris saying that the FBI needs to investigate BEFORE they can have a hearing

These fuckers are so stupid that they don’t even understand the concept of jurisdiction. The FBI doesn’t have jurisdiction to investigate this. It would be a local crime if one was committed at all

They are proving this is nothing more than a delaying tactic.

Of course it is nothing but a delaying tactic, goal being to muddle the nomination enough so that it will play in the midterms, nothing hurts the GOP further than being associated with identifying on the wrong side of the me too movement, why did you think Trump has been so cooperative on the events

And please, spare us the morality bit, the GOP has been playing obstructionist politics for nine years now, and I don't feel empathy for Bret, he's another weasel, will be approved, but he ain't going be any Oliver Wendal Holmes, another Thomas is more applicable
 
Of course it is nothing but a delaying tactic, goal being to muddle the nomination enough so that it will play in the midterms, nothing hurts the GOP further than being associated with identifying on the wrong side of the me too movement, why did you think Trump has been so cooperative on the events

And please, spare us the morality bit, the GOP has been playing obstructionist politics for nine years now, and I don't feel empathy for Bret, he's another weasel, will be approved, but he ain't going be any Oliver Wendal Holmes, another Thomas is more applicable
Considering the Kagan appointment, anyone appointed would be stellar
 
Of course it is nothing but a delaying tactic, goal being to muddle the nomination enough so that it will play in the midterms, nothing hurts the GOP further than being associated with identifying on the wrong side of the me too movement, why did you think Trump has been so cooperative on the events

And please, spare us the morality bit, the GOP has been playing obstructionist politics for nine years now, and I don't feel empathy for Bret, he's another weasel, will be approved, but he ain't going be any Oliver Wendal Holmes, another Thomas is more applicable

:lolup:Admitting the #metoo movement is nothing more than a leftist farce that has so far entrapped more Democrats than Republicans. :rofl2:
 
Considering the Kagan appointment, anyone appointed would be stellar

Kagan was, and has proven to be, a credible appointee, she received 67 votes in the Senate and even passed the Judiciary Committte with some Republican support. Since then, she has been a contributing Justice, has authored both majority and minority reports, something Thomas has done extremely rarely especially considering the time he has been on the Court. In addition, she hasn't waited close to a decade to ask questions
 
maybe not. Remember this is like 40 years ago. The statute of limitations may have run out.

This is about more than just this one accusation; this is about how the GOP knew of this accusation, and probably many more, and went to lengths to prep a document that speaks to Brett's character because they foresaw this exact scenario happening.

So the GOP covered this up; what else of Brett are they covering up? His time in the Bush the Dumber swamp. To me, what he did while working for Bush the Dumber is far more serious and consequential than his proclivity to sexual violence. And the GOP has obscured and obstructed 96% of his time in the Bush the Dumber swamp. Why? What are they hiding from his time in the Bush the Dumber swamp? What did he lie about? What did he cover up? All his correspondence from his time as a Bush the Dumber stooge should be brought to the surface. If Kagan and Sotomayor had to dump virtually all of their docs and correspondence, then so should he.
 
Back
Top