Should the House Democrats have allowed the Republicans an equal amount of witnesses to support the President and abide by America's constitutional tradition of "due process" when the House was making their case for impeaching Donald Trump?" What were they COVERING UP?
Should the House Democrats have allowed the Republicans an equal amount of witnesses to support the President and abide by America's constitutional tradition of "due process" when the House was making their case for impeaching Donald Trump?" What were they COVERING UP?
Should the House Democrats have allowed the Republicans an equal amount of witnesses to support the President and abide by America's constitutional tradition of "due process" when the House was making their case for impeaching Donald Trump?" What were they COVERING UP?
The House Democrats offered trump witnesses, and he rejected them. But there is no requirement that an investigation be even handed. The trial is supposed to be even handed.
The House offered witnesses. The senate offered none. How do you cover up when the Repubs had witnesses ? In the Senate none. Can you see the difference? The one with zero witnesses is the one covering up.
Trump rejected the witnesses they offered because he wanted to end this as fast as possible. Another sign he's guilty.
No, they didn't liar. YOU don't get to declare the trial in the Senate 'unfair'.
Trump doesn't vote in the Senate. The Senate decided to not call witnesses, no one else.
The House offered witnesses. The senate offered none. How do you cover up when the Repubs had witnesses ? In the Senate none. Can you see the difference? The one with zero witnesses is the one covering up.
Trump rejected the witnesses they offered because he wanted to end this as fast as possible. Another sign he's guilty.
Trump had 51 votes in his pocket. They were his votes and him pulling the strings.
Every witness requested by Republicans in the House was refused by Schiff & Naddler. They ask for the whistle-blower and was refused. The house rejected any participation of Trump lawyers. What was Schiff and Naddler covering up?
The whistleblower is guaranteed anonymity. Even you can see putting him on the stand would be harmful to whistleblower protections. It would certainly dampen whistleblowers in the future. Even a righty like Roberts refused to play that game.
When in any exhibition of fairness does the prosecution get to choose the witnesses for the accused? Why didn't Trump's lawyers get to face Trump's accuser? What was the House Democrats covering up?
The GOP accusing the Dems of what they themselves are doing is laughable.
NeverTrump for a TrumpNeverTwentyTwenty
Trump's lawyers could have called witnesses too, they didn't want to. Which makes sense because every witness involved admitted that this was a personally-motivated shakedown.
The House Democrats offered trump witnesses, and he rejected them. But there is no requirement that an investigation be even handed. The trial is supposed to be even handed.
Just a little advise Jimmy. You might want to get your safe space ready for a Trump landslide in 2020 with Congress majorities riding his coat tails.