The Democrat's cover up

Robo

Verified User
Should the House Democrats have allowed the Republicans an equal amount of witnesses to support the President and abide by America's constitutional tradition of "due process" when the House was making their case for impeaching Donald Trump?" What were they COVERING UP?
 
Should the House Democrats have allowed the Republicans an equal amount of witnesses to support the President and abide by America's constitutional tradition of "due process" when the House was making their case for impeaching Donald Trump?" What were they COVERING UP?

The House Democrats offered trump witnesses, and he rejected them. But there is no requirement that an investigation be even handed. The trial is supposed to be even handed.
 
Should the House Democrats have allowed the Republicans an equal amount of witnesses to support the President and abide by America's constitutional tradition of "due process" when the House was making their case for impeaching Donald Trump?" What were they COVERING UP?

The House offered witnesses. The senate offered none. How do you cover up when the Repubs had witnesses ? In the Senate none. Can you see the difference? The one with zero witnesses is the one covering up.
 
Should the House Democrats have allowed the Republicans an equal amount of witnesses to support the President and abide by America's constitutional tradition of "due process" when the House was making their case for impeaching Donald Trump?" What were they COVERING UP?

Trump rejected the witnesses they offered because he wanted to end this as fast as possible. Another sign he's guilty.
 
The House Democrats offered trump witnesses, and he rejected them. But there is no requirement that an investigation be even handed. The trial is supposed to be even handed.

No, they didn't liar. YOU don't get to declare the trial in the Senate 'unfair'.
 
The House offered witnesses. The senate offered none. How do you cover up when the Repubs had witnesses ? In the Senate none. Can you see the difference? The one with zero witnesses is the one covering up.

YOU don't get to declare how the Senate runs their affairs.
 
The House offered witnesses. The senate offered none. How do you cover up when the Repubs had witnesses ? In the Senate none. Can you see the difference? The one with zero witnesses is the one covering up.

Every witness requested by Republicans in the House was refused by Schiff & Naddler. They ask for the whistle-blower and was refused. The house rejected any participation of Trump lawyers. What was Schiff and Naddler covering up?
 
Trump rejected the witnesses they offered because he wanted to end this as fast as possible. Another sign he's guilty.

When in any exhibition of fairness does the prosecution get to choose the witnesses for the accused? Why didn't Trump's lawyers get to face Trump's accuser? What was the House Democrats covering up?
 
Trump had 51 votes in his pocket. They were his votes and him pulling the strings.

Your lovely hero Nancy Pelosi and many of your Democrat henchmen said several times that all impeachments must be BI-PARTISAN! The House vote to impeach was BI-PARTISAN to NOT impeach, ZERO Republicans voted for impeachment.
 
Every witness requested by Republicans in the House was refused by Schiff & Naddler. They ask for the whistle-blower and was refused. The house rejected any participation of Trump lawyers. What was Schiff and Naddler covering up?

The whistleblower is guaranteed anonymity. Even you can see putting him on the stand would be harmful to whistleblower protections. It would certainly dampen whistleblowers in the future. Even a righty like Roberts refused to play that game.
 
The whistleblower is guaranteed anonymity. Even you can see putting him on the stand would be harmful to whistleblower protections. It would certainly dampen whistleblowers in the future. Even a righty like Roberts refused to play that game.

Guaranteed by who or what? There's no statute that guarantees any accuser of anonymity! Y'all Gestapo loving Democrats need to read the GUARANTEES listed in Amendment 6 in our Constitution PROTECTING the rights of the accused. The Constitution is THE LAW, not your CNN & MSNBC talking points!
 
When in any exhibition of fairness does the prosecution get to choose the witnesses for the accused? Why didn't Trump's lawyers get to face Trump's accuser? What was the House Democrats covering up?

Trump's lawyers could have called witnesses too, they didn't want to. Which makes sense because every witness involved admitted that this was a personally-motivated shakedown.
 
The GOP accusing the Dems of what they themselves are doing is laughable.

NeverTrump for a TrumpNeverTwentyTwenty

Just a little advise Jimmy. You might want to get your safe space ready for a Trump landslide in 2020 with Congress majorities riding his coat tails.
 
Trump's lawyers could have called witnesses too, they didn't want to. Which makes sense because every witness involved admitted that this was a personally-motivated shakedown.

Trump's lawyers weren't even allowed in the House hearings and they needed ZERO lawyers in the Senate where due process prevailed because Democrats never even charged Trump with a crime, (they couldn't find any again), as required by the CONSTITUTION!
 
Just a little advise Jimmy. You might want to get your safe space ready for a Trump landslide in 2020 with Congress majorities riding his coat tails.

Robo, you need some straight words, my friend. You better make sure you have cry room ready for the day after the Dem blue wave submerges all GOP opposition.
 
Back
Top