Lovely hero? Don't talk like that. You have no idea what I think of her, except she is good at her job, unlike trump. The House was hamstrung by the Repubs and they made it difficult. When it got to the senate, they, made it impossible. You have no problem with that because of your far right-wing political beliefs. If Trump was innocent, he would have acted like it. He did not. What kept it from being fair and equitable was the Repubs and Trump's stonewalling. It is a bit unfair that the person being investigated has the power to stop any information from getting out and from people in the know from testifying. An innocent man would not have anything to fear.
The Democrat's cover up
- Thread starter Robo
- Start date
Lovely hero? Don't talk like that. You have no idea what I think of her, except she is good at her job, unlike trump. The House was hamstrung by the Repubs and they made it difficult. When it got to the senate, they, made it impossible. You have no problem with that because of your far right-wing political beliefs. If Trump was innocent, he would have acted like it. He did not. What kept it from being fair and equitable was the Repubs and Trump's stonewalling. It is a bit unfair that the person being investigated has the power to stop any information from getting out and from people in the know from testifying. An innocent man would not have anything to fear.
My theory is that the FAKE Whistle blower was working with Schiff the pathological liar. That is why they insisted that the FAKE whistle blower's identity MUST be protected even though his FALSE claims were the source of the Clown Show impeachment put on by Nadler, Pelosi and Schiff.
So are Democrats liars, hypocrites or both in this video?
Democratic Hypocrites over impeachment on display:
So did Democrats cover up Clinton's trial when the refused to vote to convict?
How was it a cover up when the transcript was made available to the public and contained NOTHING incriminating??
Vindman admitted that the president, not unelected bureaucrats, sets U.S. policy
Vindman admitted he never had contact with President Trump
Vindman admitted having no firsthand knowledge of aid or an investigation and was just “following news accounts”
Vindman admitted Trump was “well within his rights” to ask Ukraine for help in an investigation
Vindman admitted that putting the transcript of the Ukraine call on a secure server was “definitely not unprecedented”
Vindman admitted the Trump-Zelenksy transcript was “very accurate”
Vindman admitted he has never used the term “bribery” to describe the president’s actions
Vindman said he couldn’t recall Ukrainians feeling pressured to do investigations
Vindman said, "As far as I can tell," Hunter Biden was not qualified to serve on Burisma’s board
Vindman said there was an appearance of a conflict of interest with Hunter Biden being on the Burisma board
https://pjmedia.com/trending/ten-reasons-vindmans-testimony-was-bad-for-democrats/
So Clinton had the Democrat votes in his trial; were they pulling strings for him?
Great questions which the lying losers on the left will refuse to acknowledge.
They went further than that in 1998. Nadler said it was lowering the standard of impeachment. That when we had REAL crimes.
Jerry Nadler | We're Lowering the Standard of Impeachment
BULL SHIT. Besides, he wasn't a real whistle blower. He was an accomplice for Schiff and his House Clown show.
Trump's lawyers were not permitted in the hearings along with the FACT that Nadler and Schiff would not permit the Republicans to call the witnesses they wanted. I do wish you weren't such a lying, gullible dunce.
House managers in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump filed their brief to the Senate on Saturday outlining a "compelling case" against Trump.
The House managers called Trump's behavior "the Framers' worst nightmare" and said Trump's actions present a "danger to our democratic processes."
"....the evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors is compelling and overwhelming.”
Yes they should have been less heavy handed.
They could make their same case since they just ignored details that did not support it that came out anyway but the appearance of fair play would have forced the senate to do the same.
Wouldnt have mattered in the end as their case was weak to mon existant but they might have avoided losing the house that wsy.
They could make their same case since they just ignored details that did not support it that came out anyway but the appearance of fair play would have forced the senate to do the same.
Wouldnt have mattered in the end as their case was weak to mon existant but they might have avoided losing the house that wsy.
jimmymccready
Verified User
The dems played fair, and the gop anything but.
Robo
Verified User
In the name of fairness, (you do know what that means, right?) Let us mention Nancy’s accomplishments over the last 3 years as compared to Trumps.
Trump has lowered taxes on everybody, trashed hundreds of Obama regulations, negotiated a successful MCA agreement and a phase one trade agreement with China. His policies in the mid east wiped out the radical ISIS Islamic Anti-fata, shamed the shirking European members of NATO to pay up their fair share of NATO dues. Trump began peaceful negotiations with North Korea. Trump created the lowest unemployment rates in decades and the lowest unemployment rates ever for blacks, Hispanics, Asian and women and took thousands and thousands off of food stamps.
What’s Nancy’s last 3 year accomplishments?
Explanation necessary please!
Explain please my “far right-wing political beliefs!”
How should Trump have “acted innocent?”
Again, the only reason witnesses and documents weren’t delivered to this impeachment sham was because Democrats failed to use the courts to get the witnesses and information they sought! An innocent man would have been a damned fool to allow Dems attempt another fishing expedition by not protecting the rights of every President. Even if the Dems had gone to the courts they would have lost because a fair court ruling would have demanded some evidence that Dems had to believe there was credible evidence, (a smoking gun), to be had and a crime had been committed, ( it’s called “probable cause” supported by “oath or affirmation”), , they had ZERO! That’s why they ignored the courts! Read amendment 4 of the U.S. Constitution!
Robo
Verified User
Turn off FAKE NEWS CNN & MSNBC Jimmy, turn on the fair, balanced and honest Fox News!
Into the Night
Verified User
YOU don't get to declare a 'fake' trial. YOU don't get to declare an 'unfair' trial. You are not the Senate.
Into the Night
Verified User
Trump doesn't vote in the Senate. The Senate decided to not call witnesses, no one else.