The Democrats' Temporary Authoritarian Control of America

Libhater said:
First of all there was no coup attempt, and it wasn't an insurrection. And Trump had absolutely nothing to do with the protest, in fact, he
told the people to go there peacefully and patriotically. Trump actually asked the house police and nancy pelousy to send in 10,000 extra
police just in case, but he and America got no reply and no action on Trump's request.
Click to expand...

You should have started your post ,"once upon a time"
 
Libhater said:
First of all there was no coup attempt, and it wasn't an insurrection. And Trump had absolutely nothing to do with the protest, in fact, he
told the people to go there peacefully and patriotically. Trump actually asked the house police and nancy pelousy to send in 10,000 extra
police just in case, but he and America got no reply and no action on Trump's request.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as the "House Police", could you be thinking of the Capitol Police? The Capitol Police are under the oversight of the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol... NONE WERE PELOSI!!! Pelosi would have had some say on who the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives is, but absolutely none on the other two. The other two were appointed at the time by Republicans. And again, that is only oversight, not day-to-day operations.

If trump had wanted to call up 10,000 National Guards in DC, he would not need anyone's permission. Pelosi would have no say over that.

So basically put, absolutely nothing "Libhater" says is valid.
 
Walt said:
There is no such thing as the "House Police", could you be thinking of the Capitol Police? The Capitol Police are under the oversight of the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol... NONE WERE PELOSI!!! Pelosi would have had some say on who the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives is, but absolutely none on the other two. The other two were appointed at the time by Republicans. And again, that is only oversight, not day-to-day operations.

If trump had wanted to call up 10,000 National Guards in DC, he would not need anyone's permission. Pelosi would have no say over that.

So basically put, absolutely nothing "Libhater" says is valid.
Click to expand...

You are totally wrong. Look again, I called them the House Police It was the friggin House riots we are speaking of here. Pelosi was in charge of, or should have been in charge of ordering the number of guards/police that Trump had suggested in case of something getting out of hand, which she flunked because as we all know she never did anything worthwhile so long as it came from Trump or from and Republican for that matter.
 
Libhater said:
You are totally wrong. Look again, I called them the House Police It was the friggin House riots we are speaking of here. Pelosi was in charge of
Click to expand...

No, the House was not even in session that day. It was a Capitol riot, against the Senate which was in session that day. Pelosi was a spectator, nothing more.

You really should have a better education in civics.

Libhater said:
or should have been in charge of ordering the number of guards/police that Trump had suggested in case of something getting out of hand, which she flunked because as we all know she never did anything worthwhile so long as it came from Trump or from and Republican for that matter.
Click to expand...

Why would a spectator be in charge of the police that trump deployed? That does not even begin to make sense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top