The drug boats will stop now

How do you know they contained drugs?
Point of origin. Known drug smuggling route. Visible cargo in the boat.
No one ever confirmed they were shipping drugs
Lie.
and the only evidence we have is what Donnie and his lemmings said, and we know how honest Donnie is
Quite honest, compared to you.
Does that mean the “25,000” deaths per boat Trump claimed are now saved?
A single boat is able to carry 4.5T of product. That's a LOT of cocaine.
 
The people being killed are just grunts. Even were they really terrorists, as signatory to the Geneva Convention, we are bound by its rules even if the "terrorists" are not.

It astounds me how the Reichwing will go to all lengths to redefine a person or a group as terrorists or communists or jihadists or whatever in order to justify breaking our treaties and conventions.
That's not exculpatory. "Just grunts" is not good enough to remove the designation, "just grunts" flew planes into buildings while the Osama Bin Ladens laughed it up and celebrated. They are part of the machine that uses violence, assassinations, attacks, kidnapping, to coerce and frighten populaces and to influence government policy.
 
That's not exculpatory. "Just grunts" is not good enough to remove the designation, "just grunts" flew planes into buildings while the Osama Bin Ladens laughed it up and celebrated. They are part of the machine that uses violence, assassinations, attacks, kidnapping, to coerce and frighten populaces and to influence government policy.

There is a huge difference between plane -hijacking jihadists who fly planes into buildings filled with thousands of people, and grunts piloting a boat with the chemical precursors of deadly drugs in the hopes of making some bucks but not giving a shit if some people end up stupidly dying from what those chemicals are made into. That's not terrorism. It's profiteering.

Even so, killing survivors in the water after an initial attack that sunk their their vessel is against the GC, which we agreed to abide by. And because it is the ethical, humanitarian thing not to do.

We fucked up this one. If drug deaths are the issue let's deal with WHY DO PEOPLE USE THEM instead of the always-failed attempts at curbing supply. The Prohibition was a century ago, and look how successful THAT was.
 
Gawd, you people are gullible.

First you see some video shot by infra red cameras, of boats exploding in the water.

Then you claim progress and regurgitate some statistics that were hand fed to you by... whom?

The same media you refuse to believe when they report news you don't want to hear.

Never asking yourself if any of what you've seen and heard/read is real or just concocted propaganda the way you would be if a Democrat administration made some kind of similar claim.

Meanwhile....

View attachment 69912
Look! Imaginary Epstein Files! UFOs! Chemtrails! Fake Moon landings! Bigfoot has been spotted again! It's the Russians! 132 genders! A man is a woman! It's the Killer Virus!
 
There is a huge difference between plane -hijacking jihadists who fly planes into buildings filled with thousands of people, and grunts piloting a boat with the chemical precursors of deadly drugs in the hopes of making some bucks but not giving a shit if some people end up stupidly dying from what those chemicals are made into.
Not a lot. The raid on the World Trade Center killed fewer people than drugs have done.
That's not terrorism. It's profiteering.
It's also terrorism. It is profiteering by intimidation, by violence, and by thuggery.
Even so, killing survivors in the water after an initial attack that sunk their their vessel is against the GC, which we agreed to abide by.
No, it isn't. Piracy and smuggling are exempt.
And because it is the ethical, humanitarian thing not to do.
So you would rather they suffer getting eaten by sharks. Now do you think your argument is a humane one?
We fucked up this one. If drug deaths are the issue let's deal with WHY DO PEOPLE USE THEM instead of the always-failed attempts at curbing supply. The Prohibition was a century ago, and look how successful THAT was.
So you are trying to justify alcoholism, drugs that cause homelessness and misery, turning people into living zombies, and other such 'recreation'.
You are trying to justify the violent gangs and thuggery...not just here but in Mexico and Venezuela.

People use them because they are addicted.

Why do you support the Homeless Industrial complex? Why do you support such misery and crime?
 
Back
Top