The article starts out with outrageous statements that turns anyone but a flaming liberal off immediately. But if you stay with it you get to read some real gems, ending with the following few paragraphs which are, for lack of a better descriptor, baloney.
"But this is also part of the problem: the monetizing of higher education, as if the potential increase in wages is the most important metric of going to college. The liberal arts are especially under seige. Why study literature or history, anyway? Parents ask, "How will this degree help my kid get a job?" Of course, they want a return on investment.
But a liberal arts education, given the new work environment of the 21st century, when people will have multiple career trajectories during their lives, may be more crucial than ever. It trains students to probe and ask questions; to look at more than one side of an argument; to open their hearts and minds to other worldviews; to do research to try to figure out the best solutions to problems; to develop analytical thinking; to write and speak clearly and forcefully; to accept failure as part of the process of success; and to be flexible in adapting to new work routines and challenges.
This habit of mind — adaptive, open to new ideas and challenges, accepting of difference, understanding of history — is exactly what young people need to succeed now more than ever, and precisely what the defunders of higher education do not want young people to acquire."
Seriously, why go to college other than to better yourself financially unless you're already affluent? Of course parents want their kid to go to college to get skills and expect them to get out and be able to get a job ... and that's why you don't ... I repeat, don't encourage a liberal arts degree.