Public colleges and universities nationwide have seen significant funding cuts over the past five years. While the recession is usually blamed, conservatives keep the fiscal screws tight by cutting taxes on the wealthy and corporations.
Take California as an example. Disinvestment has been so massive — 9 percent over the past 10 years — that according to the Public Policy Institute of California, the state now spends more on its prison system than on its public universities.
The article blames Republicans, but a few sentences later it uses California as an example of the problem. Guess the writer did not realize that the state is run by democrats.
No mention of how states are lowering the standard to pass based on the color of your skin.
**********************************************************************************************************
Higher education, lower standards
Everyone should go to college, we’re frequently told. But what if we had a college, and nobody came? And still got credit anyway.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill may not have gotten quite to that point, but it’s come close: More than 200 classes offered by the African Studies department, and very popular with athletes, appear not to have actually existed. Some of these courses “appeared to have little or no instruction. Nine of those classes listed instructors who said they had nothing to do with the classes, and that related records with their handwriting were forged.”
UNC’s chancellor and football coach lost their jobs. The African Studies department chair, Professor Julius Nyang’oro, is under indictment for fraud. That’s bad enough. But it gets worse.
Now we’re hearing that many UNC athletes can’t really read or write. No one, of course, expects a person who excels at a sport to necessarily excel at academics, any more than we expect Nobel Prize winners to posses a great jump shot. But college “students” who are functionally illiterate strike at the very point of college, which is, supposedly, to educate.
Observing this phenomenon, Kevin Carey, director of the Education Policy Program at the New America Foundation, writes:
“UNC Chapel Hill is not a coherent undergraduate institution. It’s a holding company that provides shared marketing, finance and physical plant services for a group of autonomous departments, which are in turn holding companies for autonomous scholars who teach as they please. This is the only possible explanation for the years-long, wholly undetected operation of the African and Afro-American Studies Department credit fraud scam. Or, rather, it’s the only possible explanation other than a huge, organization-wide conspiracy in which the university administration, department, and football team colluded to hand out fake grades to hundreds of athletes.”
Either one of these possibilities is troubling, and not just for the University of North Carolina. When parents pay a lot — or, increasingly, when students borrow a lot — for a degree from a school like UNC, or, really, any institution of higher education, the presumption is that the degree means something. When hundreds of fake courses can be taught, to often functionally illiterate students, without anyone noticing, it suggests that there’s not much going on in the way of quality control. UNC isn’t even offering makeup classes for this fake coursework, meaning that the bogus credits will remain on students’ transcripts.
Of course, as the old joke has it, education is the only product where most consumers are out to get as little as possible for their money. But what about the people, like employers, who rely on a college degree as an indicator that its holder has actually received a college education?
It’s possible that this problem is limited to the University of North Carolina, and that some particularly toxic strain of corruption has somehow infested its lovely Chapel Hill campus. But it’s more likely that UNC isn’t as unusual as all that. Near-illiterate athletes are certainly not limited to UNC.
After the Chapel Hill scandals broke, CNN conducted an investigation of athletic programs across the nation, finding that at public universities across the country, many football and basketball players are reading at the eighth-grade level, making it doubtful that they’re passing college classes on their own. The CNN report added: “The data obtained through open records requests also showed a staggering achievement gap between college athletes and their peers at the same institution.”
In a way that’s a relief. If the substandard education offered to athletes is the only substandard education that big universities are providing, the problem is still serious, but at least somewhat limited. But it’s also quite possible that many classes, taught at many schools, are only a cut or two above the no-show classes that Julius Nyang’oro allegedly offered. Because if you can get away with offering hundreds of bogus classes at a top American university for years before anyone notices, the quality control isn’t very high.
And, in fact,
research shows that many college students, not just athletes, don’t learn much. A recent book from the University of Chicago Press, “Academically Adrift: Limited Learning On College Campuses,” by Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, found that 36 percent of college students “did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning” over a full four years in college. The reason for this is lack of rigor: Arum and Roksa found that most students study only about 12-14 hours a week, most of it in groups. Half of students don’t take a single course in which they have to write more than 20 pages over a semester. So the amount of education in “higher education” doesn’t have to be all that high.
Unsurprisingly, employers don’t trust a college degree as much as they used to. We’re already seeing the beginnings of a push to improve higher education by using outside certification to demonstrate that college graduates actually possess useful skills: Folks from ETS, ACT, and the Council for Aid to Education are rolling these out, and I think they can play a useful role, much as the bar exam does for students who graduate law school. If employers find these competency tests reliable enough, they may rely on them instead of college degrees, which would be a major blow to colleges. (On top of that, legislation now before Congress would direct federal funding to alternative higher education approaches, which will add to the pressure.)
At any rate, with college costs skyrocketing, and job prospects for graduates remaining determinedly earthbound, scandals like UNC’s are likely to cause many to think twice about the current higher education system. Is UNC’s scandal a worst-case scenario, or an indicator of a more general rot beneath the surface? I’m afraid I can guess the answer.
http://www.indystar.com/story/opini.../14/higher-education-lower-standards/4479637/
