well yes they will some day
how many evil ones have to die before the change?
that I don't know
Israel has gotten to the point where it is losing its humanity when it reacts. The reaction is always excessive.
After years of being under attack from without and within, you can certainly see the root of their excess, even though that doesn't excuse it.
But Hamas are very cynical in their approach. They play to the court of global public opinion with the lives of their children.
They fire rockets they know are ineffectual and unlikely to cause significant death tolls because they know that the Israeli reaction will be excessive. They fire these rockets from civilian areas; schools, hospitals etc to draw that excessive fire. And then play this up to the world media to generate sympathy for their cause. That is sickeningly cynical.
Considering neither side has a legitimate claim to the land, both sides are twats.
human goodness
the kids get sick of the evil if they can be connected to the rest of the world
There's a lot of misinformation evident in your post .
For one- Hamas ceased attacking Israel directly some time ago as a matter of policy. Hamas now responds only when it is attacked but the Western press only reports the Hamas response and not the Israeli aggression. This gives precisely the wrong account of events that the Israelis want. Unsurprisingly, many of the Western media outlets are owned by billionaire supporters of Zionism. So the best way for the Zionists to have Hamas condemned is for the Zionists to attack Hamas. Which they frequently do.
Secondly, Gaza is utterly impoverished- due to Israelis' illegal attacks and the Israeli illegal blockade- and Gazans have to adapt to poverty and earn a living. One way that some do this is to fire rockettes into Israel which have been commisioned by families which have had a relative of friend murdered by the Israelis. For a sum of money or a promised favour the guerrilla brigades - not Hamas- will fire into Israel. Of course we all know that these rockettes are relatively harmless. They are inaccurate and carry no warhead. Very few Israelis have been killed or injured by them. Also, the main target for the rockettes is the nearby settlement known as Sderot. Sderot is actually the Palestinian village of Nadj- from which the Zionists drove the indigenous Palestinian people in the early 1950s. The Palestinians are actually firing at the illegal occupants of their own Palestinian homes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sderot
Lastly, Gaza is the most densely populated region on earth. To say that the rockette brigades deliberately site their launchers near hospitals and schools is a nonsense. It is the Israelis who deliberately target such buildings as a form of- illegal- collective punishment of Palestinians. They also target other aspects of Palestinian civilisation, such as water plants and generators. They started their ' Cast Lead ' offensive by murdering a square full of Palestinian police cadets on parade. Such attacks are part of the neoZionist ethnic cleansing policy.
For one- Hamas ceased attacking Israel directly some time ago as a matter of policy. Hamas now responds only when it is attacked
An example of how language used indicates partisan allegiance, that you are buying into one side's propaganda.
What you really have here is a tit for tat situation. Each side will look back at the last attack on them to justify their next attack. It is impossible to identify one side as the initial aggressor because tit for tat violence is cyclic.
Anyone who has kids will recognise this. "He kicked me", "yeah because she pinched me", " that's because he pulled the head off my doll", "yeah because she tripped me up" etc etc ad nauseum.
The truth is, both sides are wrong. As a parent you separate them and tell them both off.
Your interpretation of what has occurred over the last few years is entirely one sided, your use of language clearly indicates that you have a partisan opinion on the situation and it is pretty much impossible to discuss anything with a confirmed partisan because they never see issue with the side they have adopted.
Simply presenting details of the excessive violence that I have mentioned several times coming from the IDF, doesn't negate the fact that, particularly in 2014, Hamas (or partners) fired barrages of ineffective rockets at Israeli targets knowing exactly what the Israeli response would be. The evidence of this is undeniable.
Switching tactics to knife attacks produces exactly the same effect, designed to prompt an overreaction by the Israelis to play court to global public opinion.
Does the Israeli Army Plant Knives on Palestinians?
To the Israeli ear the allegation sounds far-fetched. Israelis find it hard to believe that our soldiers and commanders could lie, until it’s proven otherwise by security footage or photos.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.686280
And this Desh, is another reason why there will never be peace in this land. Neither side, nor their partisans, will ever admit to doing any wrong. Both sides see themselves as innocents. I'm sure the Germans will have a name for this form of myopic delusion.
the only problem with your analogy is that one kid is 6'4" 250 lbs, while the other is 5'0 89 lbs.
An example of how language used indicates partisan allegiance, that you are buying into one side's propaganda.
What you really have here is a tit for tat situation. Each side will look back at the last attack on them to justify their next attack. It is impossible to identify one side as the initial aggressor because tit for tat violence is cyclic.
I have one child who is five and another who is a teenager. They squabble all the time. Her size doesn't excuse the five year old for continuing the tit for tat, or for the mischief she does to her brother in her turn.
They both get told to stop squabbling.
Gaza faces harsh winter after Israel cuts gas supply
Palestinians say Israel has drastically reduced natural gas into Gaza, worsening bitter cold weather conditions.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/...r-israel-cuts-gas-supply-160113151958861.html
Gaza's agricultural sector - which depends heavily on gas to run greenhouses, especially since Israel sprayed herbicides to destroy vast swathes of crops near the border as part of a "no-grow zone" - has been further hurt by the gas crisis.
You speak as if an impartial position is moral- whereas it is halfway towards supporting a doctrine of ethnic cleansing and an illegal occupation.
You claim that Palestinians fire ineffective rockettes at Israelis in the full knowledge that the Israelis will slaughter thousands of Palestinians ? I think you had better review your ' undeniable evidence ' and post it here
Peace will come when Israel is forced to comply with international law.
You like a good self hating Jew, do you, Fraulein?
That's simply an attempt to justify Zionist aggression by creating a moral ' side ' for it.
In truth the first act of aggression was the invasion of Palestine by European Zionists. No invasion = no resistance to invasion. Mull on that for a while.
You think that's a convenient moral niche you've created for yourself but it's a rejection of morality. You fail to recognise Zionism as the root of the problem, a doctrine of ethnic cleansing - condemned by its own speeches and writings- which seeks to rob an indigenous people of their homeland by means of a programme of brutal aggression, murder and theft. You've swallowed the Zionist propaganda and been recruited by an organisation which specialises in scorn for law- and you don't realise what's happened to you.This made me chortle. I would describe partisans of both sides as having a dodgy moral compass. As I have said, to be partisan means seeing fault only in your opponent and to turn a blind side to the fault of your own side.
How can you ever come to a peaceful settlement without being impartial, without admitting the faults on both sides and working to fix them? To be a partisan is to fan the violence. Which is difficult to see as moral.
Also, by logical extension of your argument, the violence of the crusades is justified by the illegal occupation and ethnic cleansing of the Christians when Arab Islam conquered the area in the C7th? You realise that, right?
You want me to link that Hamas were firing ineffectual rockets into Israel? Or are you struggling to comprehend that Hamas knew what the reaction would be? What do you imagine Hamas thought the reaction would be? Do you think they thought that Israel would immediately retreat to the 1948 borders in the face of this terrifying barrage of ineffectual rockets? Really?
Knives.... again, two partisan sources. google 'echo chamber'. And again, tit for tat. You are taking a side when this violence is clearly cyclic.
Lets examine the time before Israeli illegal occupation started. How much peace occurred then exactly?