the Founding Fathers were all Liberals

Hello Flash,



These are altruistic ideas that simply need to be funded. The poor have no resources to provide funding. The middle are capable, but it would usually involve a level of sacrifice to do it. And that leaves us with the rich.

It is not punishment when it represents zero impact on their lifestyle, but it can make such a huge difference to the disadvantaged. The rich have more money than they will ever spend during their lifetime. They are simply going to pass it on to the family. So, we are talking about people who stand to inherit great sums of wealth who will be inheriting less, but still a lot.

And for the most part, they have already been imparted with an upbringing which prepares them to be very successful in their own right.

What ever happened to the sense of accomplishment of having made your own way in the world? Bequeathing so much wealth on a person that they never even have to work in the first place completely removes the chance for them to 'make it on their own.'
80 percent of the millionaires in this country are first generation millionaires.
 
Hello Dirt McGirt,

80 percent of the millionaires in this country are first generation millionaires.

Being a millionaire is not as big a deal as it used to be. If you own a house in a certain market and keep up your payments, boom, you're a 'millionaire' on paper. And those become millionaires which comprise part of that statistic.

They are technically rich, but they are not who I was referring to in my post. When I said 'tax the rich,' sure, technical millionaires should pay something, but not very much of what they have. It is the multi-millionaires, those with 5 million, 10 million, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, up to billions of dollars. THOSE people.

They can afford to pay quite a lot of taxes. They are under taxed. They know it. Some of them are fully willing to pay more as long as everyone else in their class does too. And if they do? It will not affect their lifestyle one bit.

America is a great country. We have a lot of wealth in this country. It's time we ask the holders of that wealth to pony up more to pay back the country which allowed them to become so wealthy. America needs it.

And when we set up programs that result in home ownership for those who previously have been unable to achieve that status? That breaks the cycle of cross-generational poverty. It gives people the hope and security which allows them to excel. It provides the foundation to break the school-to-prison pipeline for black youth and sets them up to become productive members of society, tax-payers in their own right. It reduces the number of incarcerated, reduces the government outlay to incarcerate so many (a national embarrassment,) and it augments our economy and GDP.

It is time to tap into the long-overlooked goldmine of human capital ready to amp up our economy. Sure, we will be requiring the rich to pay more. But it will actually come back to them and everyone else in dividends.
 
Hello Dirt McGirt,



Being a millionaire is not as big a deal as it used to be. If you own a house in a certain market and keep up your payments, boom, you're a 'millionaire' on paper. And those become millionaires which comprise part of that statistic.

They are technically rich, but they are not who I was referring to in my post. When I said 'tax the rich,' sure, technical millionaires should pay something, but not very much of what they have. It is the multi-millionaires, those with 5 million, 10 million, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, up to billions of dollars. THOSE people.

They can afford to pay quite a lot of taxes. They are under taxed. They know it. Some of them are fully willing to pay more as long as everyone else in their class does too. And if they do? It will not affect their lifestyle one bit.

America is a great country. We have a lot of wealth in this country. It's time we ask the holders of that wealth to pony up more to pay back the country which allowed them to become so wealthy. America needs it.

And when we set up programs that result in home ownership for those who previously have been unable to achieve that status? That breaks the cycle of cross-generational poverty. It gives people the hope and security which allows them to excel. It provides the foundation to break the school-to-prison pipeline for black youth and sets them up to become productive members of society, tax-payers in their own right. It reduces the number of incarcerated, reduces the government outlay to incarcerate so many (a national embarrassment,) and it augments our economy and GDP.

It is time to tap into the long-overlooked goldmine of human capital ready to amp up our economy. Sure, we will be requiring the rich to pay more. But it will actually come back to them and everyone else in dividends.

And what does this plan look like to you? I see a lot of talking points but no plan to actually make it happen.
 
Hello Dirt McGirt,

And what does this plan look like to you? I see a lot of talking points but no plan to actually make it happen.

I mentioned no plan.

I am simply giving my views in a political forum:

"I think the best way to finance reparations would be to tax the rich, because they have benefited the most from inequity. It would be a very good thing to reduce poverty if more people can get over the hurdles to home ownership."
 
Hello Dirt McGirt,

Being a millionaire is not as big a deal as it used to be. If you own a house in a certain market and keep up your payments, boom, you're a 'millionaire' on paper. And those become millionaires which comprise part of that statistic.

They are technically rich, but they are not who I was referring to in my post. When I said 'tax the rich,' sure, technical millionaires should pay something, but not very much of what they have. It is the multi-millionaires, those with 5 million, 10 million, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, up to billions of dollars. THOSE people.

They can afford to pay quite a lot of taxes. They are under taxed. They know it. Some of them are fully willing to pay more as long as everyone else in their class does too. And if they do? It will not affect their lifestyle one bit.

America is a great country. We have a lot of wealth in this country. It's time we ask the holders of that wealth to pony up more to pay back the country which allowed them to become so wealthy. America needs it.

And when we set up programs that result in home ownership for those who previously have been unable to achieve that status? That breaks the cycle of cross-generational poverty. It gives people the hope and security which allows them to excel. It provides the foundation to break the school-to-prison pipeline for black youth and sets them up to become productive members of society, tax-payers in their own right. It reduces the number of incarcerated, reduces the government outlay to incarcerate so many (a national embarrassment,) and it augments our economy and GDP.

It is time to tap into the long-overlooked goldmine of human capital ready to amp up our economy. Sure, we will be requiring the rich to pay more. But it will actually come back to them and everyone else in dividends.

The wealthy are the only group that pays a higher percentage of federal income taxes than their percentage of annual income. All others pay a lower percentage than their income; so, I don't think they are "under taxed."
 
Hello Dirt McGirt,

I mentioned no plan.

I am simply giving my views in a political forum:

"I think the best way to finance reparations would be to tax the rich, because they have benefited the most from inequity. It would be a very good thing to reduce poverty if more people can get over the hurdles to home ownership."

You are assuming people support reparations which is not true.

"Nearly two-thirds of Americans and 90% of Republicans oppose the idea of providing reparations to the descendants of slaves, according to the results of a nationwide University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB poll released today."
 
Hello Flash,

The wealthy are the only group that pays a higher percentage of federal income taxes than their percentage of annual income. All others pay a lower percentage than their income; so, I don't think they are "under taxed."

We can tax them more and make America greater. And that is what we should do.

If we don't, poverty grows.

Population growth is almost entirely occurring in impoverished families.

When people climb in wealth, they stop having too many babies.

We help the poor climb into prosperity and we can end population growth.

There are too many people on the planet. Everything gets better, all the systems have less pressure, when we limit population growth.

Ending population growth is the single most important factor in dealing with the Climate Crisis. Fewer people = less strain on all of the support systems that fuel Climate Change.
 
Back
Top